Interior's $18.4M Management Support Contract Awarded to Analytic Services Inc. via Competitive Delivery Order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,453,049 ($18.5M)

Contractor: Analytic Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2005-01-03

End Date: 2007-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,092 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.9K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20330

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $18.5 million to ANALYTIC SERVICES INC. for work described as: MANAGEMENT SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $18.4 million over 3 years. 2. Awarded competitively, suggesting potential for good pricing. 3. Risk is moderate due to Time and Materials pricing. 4. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $18.4 million for 3 years appears reasonable for management consulting services. Benchmarking against similar contracts would provide a more precise assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Awarded via a competitive delivery order, indicating multiple vendors likely participated. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Competitive award suggests taxpayers likely received fair value for the services rendered.

Public Impact

Supports departmental administrative and general management functions. Enhances operational efficiency through consulting services. Contract duration of 3 years provides stability for service delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. Spending in this area can vary significantly based on agency needs and economic conditions.

Small Business Impact

No indication of small business participation in this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business goals were met across the broader contract vehicle.

Oversight & Accountability

The competitive delivery order process implies some level of oversight. However, detailed performance reviews and cost tracking are crucial for ensuring accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-the-interior, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $18.5 million to ANALYTIC SERVICES INC.. MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ANALYTIC SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-01-03. End: 2007-12-31.

What specific management challenges did the Department of the Interior aim to address with this contract?

The contract aimed to provide administrative management and general management consulting services. This could encompass a wide range of needs, such as improving organizational efficiency, developing strategic plans, optimizing resource allocation, or implementing new management practices within the Department's various offices.

What are the primary risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure for this contract?

The primary risk of T&M pricing is the potential for cost escalation if the scope of work is not well-defined or if project duration extends beyond initial estimates. Without fixed price elements, there's less incentive for the contractor to control labor hours and material costs, potentially leading to higher overall expenditures for the government.

How effectively did the competitive delivery order process ensure optimal value for taxpayer dollars?

The competitive nature of the delivery order suggests that multiple vendors vied for the contract, which typically drives down prices and encourages efficient service delivery. This process is designed to ensure fair market value. However, ongoing monitoring of performance and costs is essential to confirm that the anticipated value was indeed realized throughout the contract's lifecycle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Address: 2900 S QUINCY ST, ARLINGTON, VA, 22206

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,819,012

Exercised Options: $19,819,012

Current Obligation: $18,453,049

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0026J

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-01-03

Current End Date: 2007-12-31

Potential End Date: 2007-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-01-23

More Contracts from Analytic Services Inc.

View all Analytic Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of the Interior Contracts

View all Department of the Interior contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending