EPA's Superfund Redevelopment Initiative contract awarded to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. for $44.9M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,952,600 ($45.0M)

Contractor: Skeo Solutions, Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2013-11-15

End Date: 2021-10-31

Contract Duration: 2,907 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI)

Place of Performance

Location: CHARLOTTESVILLE, ALBEMARLE County, VIRGINIA, 22901

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $45.0 million to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) Key points: 1. Contract value of $44.9 million over its period of performance. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. Performance period spans over 7 years, indicating a long-term need for services. 5. Services provided fall under Environmental Consulting, a critical area for the EPA. 6. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger IDIQ or framework.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of $44.9 million over nearly 8 years suggests a significant investment in environmental consulting services. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale EPA environmental consulting contracts would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure is generally favorable for the government, as it caps potential cost overruns. However, without detailed task order breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The fact that it resulted in a single award (no=1) suggests that SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. was the most advantageous offer received based on the evaluation criteria. The level of competition is positive for price discovery, as multiple bidders likely vied for the opportunity.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment where contractors strive to offer their best terms.

Public Impact

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benefits from specialized consulting services to support its Superfund Redevelopment Initiative. Services delivered likely include technical assistance, site assessment, community engagement, and strategic planning for Superfund sites. The geographic impact is national, focusing on the cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated sites across the United States. Workforce implications include the employment of environmental scientists, engineers, planners, and consultants by SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in long-term consulting contracts if not managed tightly.
Reliance on a single contractor for a significant duration may limit flexibility.
Ensuring continued alignment with evolving EPA priorities over the contract's lifespan.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
Awarded via full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Long performance period suggests a sustained and critical need for these services.

Sector Analysis

Environmental consulting services are a vital component of the government's efforts to manage and remediate contaminated sites. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in areas such as site assessment, risk analysis, regulatory compliance, and community outreach. This contract fits within the broader category of environmental services, supporting the EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large, multi-year environmental consulting contracts awarded by federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss=false, sb=false). Therefore, the primary contractor, SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC., is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans, but for a contract of this magnitude and duration, it is common for prime contractors to engage small businesses for specialized services, potentially contributing to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officers and program managers. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for cost control. Transparency would be facilitated through contract award databases and potentially through public reporting on the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative's progress. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program
Environmental Remediation Services
Environmental Consulting Contracts
EPA Delivery Orders

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may present challenges in adapting to evolving environmental regulations or technologies.
Firm Fixed Price contracts require careful scope definition to prevent contractor underperformance or government overpayment due to unforeseen issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $45.0 million to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. IGF::OT::IGF SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $45.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-11-15. End: 2021-10-31.

What is the track record of SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. with the federal government, particularly with the EPA?

SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. has a history of contracting with the federal government, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This specific contract, valued at approximately $44.9 million and spanning from 2013 to 2021, represents a significant engagement. Analyzing past performance on similar environmental consulting or Superfund-related projects would provide deeper insight into their capabilities, reliability, and adherence to contract terms. Reviewing past performance evaluations and any documented issues or commendations would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment of their track record.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar environmental consulting services procured by the EPA or other federal agencies?

Assessing the pricing of this $44.9 million contract requires a detailed breakdown of the services rendered and the associated labor rates or fixed prices per task order. Without this granular data, direct price comparison is difficult. However, the contract's firm fixed-price (FFP) nature suggests that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government. Benchmarking against other FFP contracts for similar environmental consulting services, considering factors like contract duration, scope complexity, and geographic location, would be necessary to determine if the pricing was competitive and represented good value for money.

What are the primary risks associated with a long-term, firm-fixed-price environmental consulting contract like this one?

A primary risk for the government in a long-term, firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract is the potential for the contractor to cut corners on quality to maintain profitability if costs increase unexpectedly or if the scope is not perfectly defined. For the contractor, the risk lies in underestimating the effort required or facing unforeseen challenges that erode profit margins. For the EPA, risks include potential scope creep if not managed diligently, and the possibility that the contractor's expertise or approach may become outdated over the contract's extended duration. Ensuring robust oversight and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective has the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) been in achieving its goals, and how does this contract contribute to that effectiveness?

The Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) aims to facilitate the cleanup and reuse of Superfund sites, promoting economic revitalization and community benefit. Its effectiveness can be measured by the number of sites made available for reuse, the types of redevelopment projects undertaken, and the economic and environmental outcomes achieved. This contract, providing essential environmental consulting services, directly supports the SRI's operational goals by offering expertise in site assessment, planning, and community engagement. The success of the SRI is thus intrinsically linked to the quality and effectiveness of the consulting services provided under contracts like this one.

What are the historical spending patterns for environmental consulting services at the EPA, and how does this contract fit within that trend?

The EPA consistently spends significant amounts on environmental consulting services to support its broad mandate, including the Superfund program. Historical spending data would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the primary contracting vehicles used (e.g., IDIQs, specific task orders). This $44.9 million contract, awarded via full and open competition as a delivery order, fits within the pattern of the EPA utilizing large, long-term contracts for critical, ongoing needs. Analyzing historical spending would help contextualize the size and duration of this award relative to the agency's overall procurement strategy for environmental services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 10TH ST NE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA, 22902

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $45,117,300

Exercised Options: $45,117,300

Current Obligation: $44,952,600

Actual Outlays: $1,863,650

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0309N

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline