EPA awards $7.99M contract for Superfund Redevelopment Initiative technical assistance to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,989,150 ($8.0M)

Contractor: Skeo Solutions, Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2021-12-21

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,683 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) CALL ORDER: 14.0.0 OSRTI REGIONAL & HEADQUARTERS TASC/CI SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: CHARLOTTESVILLE, CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22902

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $8.0 million to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC for work described as: SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) CALL ORDER: 14.0.0 OSRTI REGIONAL & HEADQUARTERS TASC/CI SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract provides essential technical support for the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative, aiding in the cleanup and reuse of contaminated sites. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests predictable costs for the government. 3. Awarded under a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a pre-competed framework. 4. The contract duration of over 4 years allows for sustained support on complex environmental projects. 5. The value of the contract is relatively modest within the broader EPA environmental consulting spend. 6. Focus on technical assistance implies a role in planning, analysis, and guidance rather than direct remediation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $7.99 million over approximately 4.5 years appears reasonable for specialized environmental consulting services. Benchmarking against similar technical assistance contracts for large-scale environmental programs would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the overall value is contingent on the effective delivery of technical expertise and guidance.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is expected to yield fair market pricing and a selection of the most capable offeror. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation is a positive indicator for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and ensures the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are communities impacted by Superfund sites, through improved redevelopment planning and technical support. Services delivered include technical assistance, analysis, and guidance related to the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative. The geographic impact is national, supporting Superfund sites across various regions of the United States. The contract supports a specialized workforce of environmental consultants and technical experts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if technical assistance requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Dependence on contractor expertise requires robust government oversight to ensure quality and alignment with SRI goals.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive selection process.
Long contract duration allows for continuity of support on complex projects.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Consulting Services sector, a critical component of the broader environmental services industry. The market for environmental consulting is substantial, driven by regulatory compliance, remediation efforts, and sustainable development initiatives. This specific contract supports the EPA's Superfund program, which addresses the cleanup of hazardous waste sites. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve other technical assistance contracts awarded by the EPA or other federal agencies for similar environmental program support.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. The award to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. suggests a prime contractor capable of handling the scope of work. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved as subcontractors or if there are opportunities within the BPA framework for future small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officers and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for deliverables. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting. The Inspector General's office of the EPA would have jurisdiction for audits and investigations if any concerns regarding waste, fraud, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program
Environmental Consulting Services
Technical Assistance Contracts
EPA BPA Call Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep
Quality of technical advice
Contractor personnel retention
Effectiveness of redevelopment strategies

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $8.0 million to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) CALL ORDER: 14.0.0 OSRTI REGIONAL & HEADQUARTERS TASC/CI SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-12-21. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the track record of SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. with the EPA and similar federal agencies?

SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. has a history of performing environmental consulting services for federal agencies, including the EPA. Their experience often involves supporting environmental restoration, redevelopment, and technical assistance programs. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those related to Superfund or other hazardous waste site initiatives, would reveal their capability and reliability. Specific contract history, including past performance evaluations and any documented issues, would provide a clearer picture of their track record. Without access to detailed contract performance data, it's assumed they were selected based on demonstrated qualifications and past success in the field.

How does the value of this contract compare to other technical assistance contracts for environmental programs?

The $7.99 million contract value for technical assistance over approximately 4.5 years is a moderate investment for a program like the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative. To benchmark its value, one would compare it to similar BPA calls or standalone contracts for technical support services within the EPA or other agencies like the Army Corps of Engineers or Department of the Interior, which also manage large environmental programs. Factors such as the complexity of the sites supported, the specific technical expertise required, and the duration of support would influence comparability. A higher value might be expected for contracts involving extensive site-specific analysis or direct community engagement across numerous locations.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of technical assistance contract?

Key risks for this technical assistance contract include potential scope creep, where the requirements for technical guidance expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays. Another risk is the quality and effectiveness of the technical advice provided; if the contractor's recommendations are flawed or not practical, it could hinder Superfund site redevelopment efforts. Dependence on the contractor's specialized knowledge also poses a risk if key personnel depart. Furthermore, ensuring consistent application of guidance across diverse Superfund sites requires strong government oversight and clear communication channels. Finally, the effectiveness of the redevelopment strategies proposed by the contractor is crucial for achieving the program's goals.

How effective is the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) in promoting the reuse of former hazardous waste sites?

The Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) aims to facilitate the safe and productive reuse of Superfund sites, transforming them into community assets. Its effectiveness is generally viewed positively, as it provides resources and guidance to communities and site owners to overcome barriers to redevelopment. SRI helps by offering technical assistance, conducting site assessments, and promoting community engagement. Data from the EPA indicates that a significant number of Superfund sites have redevelopment potential, and SRI plays a crucial role in realizing this potential. However, the pace of redevelopment can vary widely depending on site complexity, local economic conditions, and community priorities. The success of SRI is often measured by the number of sites with completed or ongoing redevelopment plans and the economic and social benefits generated.

What is the historical spending trend for technical assistance services within the EPA's Superfund program?

Historical spending on technical assistance services within the EPA's Superfund program has been a consistent component of the overall program budget. These services are critical for supporting the complex technical and logistical challenges associated with site assessment, remediation planning, and redevelopment efforts. While specific annual figures for technical assistance can fluctuate based on program priorities and the number of active sites, it represents a significant portion of the program's operational costs. Analyzing historical data would likely show a steady demand for such expertise, particularly as the program matures and focuses more on site reuse and long-term management. The use of BPA calls, as seen in this award, suggests a strategy to streamline procurement for recurring technical support needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 10TH ST NE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA, 22902

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,121,225

Exercised Options: $8,121,225

Current Obligation: $7,989,150

Actual Outlays: $6,914,803

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERH21A0018

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline