EPA awards $7.2M contract for Superfund Redevelopment Initiative and Technical Assistance Services to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,207,725 ($7.2M)

Contractor: Skeo Solutions, Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2021-10-29

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,736 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) SRP TRAINING & REGIONAL SEED SUPPORT; CALL ORDER#8 FIXED PRICE

Place of Performance

Location: CHARLOTTESVILLE, CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22902

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $7.2 million to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC for work described as: SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) SRP TRAINING & REGIONAL SEED SUPPORT; CALL ORDER#8 FIXED PRICE Key points: 1. Contract focuses on Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) and Technical Assistance Services (TASC), indicating a need for specialized environmental consulting. 2. The contract type is a BPA Call, suggesting it's part of a larger agreement for ongoing services. 3. Fixed-price contract structure aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 4. The duration of the contract is over 1700 days, implying a long-term need for these services. 5. The awardee, SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC., will provide services related to SRP training and regional seed support. 6. This contract falls under environmental consulting services, a critical area for the EPA's mission.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $7.2 million for a period of approximately 4.75 years appears reasonable for specialized environmental consulting services. Benchmarking against similar EPA contracts for technical assistance and redevelopment support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The fixed-price nature of the contract helps in cost control, but the specific pricing structure and rates would need further analysis to confirm competitive value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is expected to drive fair pricing and ensure the government receives the best value. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and higher quality services, ensuring federal funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are communities impacted by Superfund sites, who will receive support for redevelopment and revitalization efforts. Services delivered include training and regional seed support, crucial for advancing the goals of the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting various Superfund sites across different EPA regions. The contract supports specialized environmental consulting expertise, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in this sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the definition of 'regional seed support' is not clearly delineated.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical technical assistance could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Ensuring consistent quality of training and support across different regions requires robust oversight.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded fair pricing.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the EPA.
Long contract duration indicates a sustained need and potential for building contractor expertise.
Focus on Superfund Redevelopment Initiative aligns with EPA's environmental protection and community revitalization goals.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Consulting Services sector, a niche but vital part of the broader professional services market. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a significant purchaser of these services, particularly for complex environmental remediation and redevelopment projects like those under the Superfund program. The market for environmental consulting is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. This contract's value of $7.2 million over nearly five years is a moderate-sized award within this sector, reflecting the specialized nature of Superfund redevelopment support.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside requirement for this BPA Call, as the 'sb' field is false. Therefore, the primary contractor, SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC., is likely not a small business, or if it is, this was not a small business set-aside award. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist depending on the specific tasks required under the BPA Call, but there is no explicit mandate for it in the provided data. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore indirect and dependent on SKEO SOLUTIONS' subcontracting strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the awarding and contracting agency. As a BPA Call, it likely falls under the purview of a larger Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) or Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, which would have its own oversight mechanisms. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by limiting cost overruns. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics and oversight activities may not be publicly detailed. The Inspector General's office of the EPA would have jurisdiction for investigating fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI)
Technical Assistance Services Contract (TASC)
Environmental Consulting Services
EPA Site Remediation Programs
Community Redevelopment Programs

Risk Flags

Contract duration exceeds typical project timelines, requiring sustained performance monitoring.
Scope of 'regional seed support' may require clarification to prevent scope creep.
Reliance on a single awardee for specialized services necessitates close performance management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $7.2 million to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) SRP TRAINING & REGIONAL SEED SUPPORT; CALL ORDER#8 FIXED PRICE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $7.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-10-29. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the track record of SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. with the EPA and similar environmental consulting contracts?

A thorough review of SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC.'s past performance with the EPA and other federal agencies is crucial. This would involve examining previous contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or corrective actions. Understanding their experience specifically with Superfund sites, redevelopment initiatives, and technical assistance services will provide insight into their capability to successfully execute this contract. Data on their past project successes, client satisfaction, and adherence to timelines and budgets would be key indicators of their reliability and expertise in this specialized field.

How does the $7.2 million contract value compare to similar EPA technical assistance and redevelopment contracts?

To benchmark the value of this $7.2 million contract, it's essential to compare it against similar contracts awarded by the EPA or other agencies for Superfund redevelopment, technical assistance, and environmental consulting services. This comparison should consider the contract duration, scope of work, and the specific services provided (e.g., training, regional support). Analyzing the average cost per year or per service unit for comparable contracts will help determine if SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC.'s pricing is competitive and reflects fair market value. A significant deviation from established benchmarks, either higher or lower, would warrant further investigation into the underlying cost factors and service expectations.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Potential risks for this contract include the contractor's ability to deliver consistent quality across diverse regional needs, potential scope creep in 'regional seed support,' and ensuring effective knowledge transfer through training. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by the EPA, clearly defined deliverables and milestones within the BPA Call, and regular progress reviews. The fixed-price nature inherently mitigates financial risk for the government, but performance risk remains. The EPA's oversight team will be critical in identifying and addressing any emerging issues proactively to ensure the contract's objectives are met.

How effective has the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) been historically, and how does this contract contribute to its goals?

The Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) aims to facilitate the cleanup and reuse of Superfund sites, promoting economic revitalization and community benefit. Historically, the SRI has seen successes in transforming former industrial sites into productive community assets, though progress can vary significantly by site and region. This contract, by providing essential training and regional seed support, directly contributes to the SRI's goals by equipping stakeholders with the knowledge and resources needed to advance redevelopment projects. Its effectiveness will be measured by the successful implementation of training programs and the tangible progress made in regional redevelopment efforts supported by this contract.

What are the historical spending patterns for environmental consulting services by the EPA, and how does this award fit within them?

The EPA consistently allocates significant funding towards environmental consulting services to manage its vast portfolio of programs, including Superfund. Historical spending data would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and major contracting vehicles used. This $7.2 million award for technical assistance and redevelopment support appears to be a standard allocation for specialized services within the Superfund program. Understanding the EPA's overall budget for environmental consulting and the proportion dedicated to SRI and TASC activities would provide context for the scale and importance of this particular contract within the agency's broader spending landscape.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 10TH ST NE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA, 22902

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,207,725

Exercised Options: $7,207,725

Current Obligation: $7,207,725

Actual Outlays: $6,759,900

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERH21A0018

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline