EPA awards $13.1M contract for Superfund Redevelopment Initiative support to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,112,925 ($13.1M)

Contractor: Skeo Solutions, Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2021-10-29

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,736 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) SRP HQ PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT; CALL ORDER#9

Place of Performance

Location: CHARLOTTESVILLE, CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22902

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $13.1 million to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC for work described as: SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) SRP HQ PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT; CALL ORDER#9 Key points: 1. Contract provides programmatic and technical assistance for EPA's Superfund Redevelopment Initiative. 2. Services include support for site revitalization and community engagement. 3. Contract duration extends through July 2026. 4. The contract is a firm-fixed-price call order under a broader BPA. 5. SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. is the prime contractor for this award. 6. The contract is managed by the Environmental Protection Agency. 7. This award falls under environmental consulting services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.1 million over its period of performance appears reasonable for specialized environmental consulting services supporting a critical EPA program. Benchmarking against similar programmatic support contracts for large federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests a degree of cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope of work is well-defined.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. This approach aligns with federal procurement best practices for ensuring fair and transparent award processes.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, driving down costs through competitive pressure and ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

Benefits the Environmental Protection Agency by providing essential support for the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative. Services delivered will aid in the revitalization of Superfund sites, promoting environmental cleanup and economic development. Geographic impact is national, supporting Superfund sites across the United States. Workforce implications include the engagement of specialized environmental consultants. Communities near Superfund sites will benefit from improved redevelopment planning and engagement.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the definition of 'programmatic support' is not tightly managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical programmatic support could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive selection process.
Long-term contract (through 2026) allows for continuity of essential services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Consulting Services sector, a niche but vital area supporting government environmental initiatives. The market for such services is driven by regulatory requirements and federal agency needs for expertise in areas like site remediation, redevelopment, and compliance. The EPA's Superfund program is a significant area of federal spending, and contracts like this are essential for its effective operation and the successful redevelopment of contaminated sites.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. The prime contractor, SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC., is not explicitly identified as a small business. Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides is minimal. However, the potential for subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the environmental consulting or related fields should be assessed based on the contractor's subcontracting plan, if applicable.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is primarily the responsibility of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officer and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI)
Environmental Consulting Services
EPA Programmatic Support Contracts
Technical Assistance Contracts
Site Remediation and Redevelopment Support

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues impacting program goals.
Risk of scope creep without diligent contract management.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical support functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $13.1 million to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. SUPERFUND REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE (SRI) AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACT (TASC) SRP HQ PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT; CALL ORDER#9

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-10-29. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the track record of SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. in performing similar environmental consulting services for federal agencies?

Assessing the track record of SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving programmatic support for environmental initiatives. Information on past performance evaluations, contract history, and any documented issues or successes would be crucial. While this specific award is for $13.1 million, understanding their experience with contracts of similar size, scope, and complexity, especially within the EPA or related agencies, is key to evaluating their capability to successfully execute this Superfund Redevelopment Initiative support. A review of federal procurement databases and past performance databases (like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would provide insights into their reliability, quality of work, and adherence to schedules and budgets on previous engagements.

How does the awarded value of $13.1 million compare to similar contracts for programmatic support within the EPA or other environmental agencies?

To benchmark the $13.1 million award, a comparison with similar contracts for programmatic and technical assistance services supporting large environmental initiatives within the EPA or other federal agencies (e.g., Department of the Interior, Department of Energy for environmental programs) is necessary. This would involve identifying contracts with comparable scopes of work, such as strategic planning, community engagement support, data analysis, and reporting for environmental programs. Factors like contract duration, the specific services provided, and the level of expertise required would influence cost. Without specific comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state if $13.1 million represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, for a multi-year contract supporting a program as significant as Superfund Redevelopment, this value appears within a plausible range for specialized consulting.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Primary risks associated with this contract could include the potential for scope creep, where the definition of 'programmatic support' expands beyond initial expectations, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays. Another risk is the contractor's performance quality; if SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. fails to deliver high-quality technical assistance and programmatic support, it could impede the EPA's redevelopment goals. Reliance on a single contractor for critical support also presents a risk if unforeseen issues arise with the vendor. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management by the EPA, including clear definition of tasks, regular performance reviews, and established communication channels. The firm-fixed-price structure itself acts as a risk mitigation tool by incentivizing the contractor to manage costs effectively. The EPA's ability to monitor progress and address issues proactively is crucial.

How effective is the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) in achieving its goals, and how does this contract contribute to that effectiveness?

The effectiveness of the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) is measured by its success in facilitating the cleanup and reuse of Superfund sites, thereby promoting environmental protection and economic revitalization. The initiative aims to overcome barriers to redevelopment by providing technical assistance, tools, and guidance to communities and site owners. This contract, by providing programmatic and technical assistance services, directly supports the SRI's operational capacity. SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. will likely assist the EPA in areas such as site assessment for redevelopment potential, community outreach, planning support, and identifying funding opportunities. The effectiveness of this contract is thus tied to its ability to enhance the EPA's capacity to implement SRI strategies, ultimately contributing to the successful redevelopment and beneficial reuse of Superfund sites nationwide.

What are the historical spending patterns for programmatic and technical assistance related to the Superfund program?

Historical spending on programmatic and technical assistance for the Superfund program has been substantial, reflecting the complexity and long-term nature of site remediation and redevelopment efforts. The EPA consistently allocates significant resources to support the Superfund mission, including funding for technical expertise, research, community engagement, and administrative support. Contracts for services similar to those awarded to SKEO SOLUTIONS, INC. are a recurring component of this spending. Analyzing historical data would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the primary contractors involved. This context helps in evaluating whether the current $13.1 million award is consistent with past investments or represents a significant shift in spending priorities or contract scope for Superfund support services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 10TH ST NE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA, 22902

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,112,925

Exercised Options: $13,112,925

Current Obligation: $13,112,925

Actual Outlays: $11,976,300

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERH21A0018

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline