DOJ's $12.8M litigation support contract to CACI, LLC awarded via competitive delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,827,423 ($12.8M)

Contractor: CACI, LLC - Commercial

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2009-02-04

End Date: 2013-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,577 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: AUTOMATED LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR KATRINA CANAL BREACHES DJ# 157-0-272

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22201

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $12.8 million to CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL for work described as: AUTOMATED LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR KATRINA CANAL BREACHES DJ# 157-0-272 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to CACI, LLC for automated litigation support services. 2. The contract duration spans over 4 years, from February 2009 to May 2013. 3. This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating multiple bids were considered. 4. The primary service category is 'All Other Legal Services', with a NAICS code of 541199. 5. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges. 6. The contract was not set aside for small businesses. 7. The contract was awarded to CACI, LLC, a large business.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $12.8 million for automated litigation support over approximately 4 years suggests a moderate level of spending. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for legal support services would be necessary to determine true value for money. The Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, can sometimes lead to higher costs if not closely managed, compared to fixed-price contracts. Without specific performance metrics or comparisons to industry standards for litigation support, a definitive value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER', indicating that it was competed among multiple vendors. The presence of 3 bidders (no) suggests a reasonable level of competition for this specific delivery order. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more competitive price and potentially better service offerings due to the bidding process.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice benefits from automated litigation support services, aiding in case management and legal processes. Legal professionals within the DOJ will utilize these services to streamline discovery and document review. The services are likely utilized across various legal divisions within the Department of Justice. The contract supports the operational efficiency of the federal legal system.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the services provided.
The contract duration of over 4 years might not reflect the most current technological solutions available for litigation support.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive delivery order process, suggesting a degree of market vetting.
The contract supports a critical function within the Department of Justice, contributing to the administration of justice.
CACI, LLC is a well-established government contractor with experience in various support services.

Sector Analysis

The legal services sector within the federal government encompasses a wide range of support functions, from administrative to specialized legal assistance. Automated litigation support falls under professional services, often involving technology to manage large volumes of legal data. Spending in this area is driven by the volume and complexity of legal cases managed by federal agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at the cost per case or cost per document processed for similar litigation support contracts across different agencies.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award went to CACI, LLC, a large business. This means the direct economic benefit to the small business ecosystem from this specific contract is likely minimal, unless CACI, LLC voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Justice's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the Time and Materials contract, including regular reporting and invoice reviews. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Legal Support Services
Litigation Support
Professional Services
Department of Justice Contracts
Automated Document Processing

Risk Flags

Time and Materials pricing structure
Potential for cost overruns without strict oversight
Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $12.8 million to CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL. AUTOMATED LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR KATRINA CANAL BREACHES DJ# 157-0-272

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-02-04. End: 2013-05-31.

What was the specific nature of the 'automated litigation support services' provided under this contract?

The contract data indicates 'AUTOMATED LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES' were provided. While specific details are not enumerated in the provided data, such services typically involve the use of technology to manage, review, and analyze large volumes of documents and evidence in legal proceedings. This can include e-discovery, document management systems, data analytics for legal research, and case management software. The goal is to increase efficiency, reduce manual labor, and improve accuracy in handling complex legal cases for the Department of Justice.

How does the $12.8 million contract value compare to other DOJ litigation support contracts?

Without access to a comprehensive database of all Department of Justice (DOJ) litigation support contracts, a direct comparison of the $12.8 million value is difficult. However, this amount represents a significant investment in legal support services over a four-year period. To assess its relative value, one would need to compare it against contracts for similar services (e.g., e-discovery, legal document management) awarded around the same time, considering factors like contract duration, scope of work, and number of bidders. The fact that it was competitively awarded suggests the price was considered reasonable within the market at the time of award.

What are the potential risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for litigation support?

Time and Materials contracts, like the one awarded to CACI, LLC, carry inherent risks for the government, primarily related to cost control. Since the contractor is reimbursed for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the cost of materials used, there is less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts. If the scope of work is not well-defined or if project management is weak, costs can escalate beyond initial estimates. For litigation support, this could mean longer-than-expected review times or increased use of higher-paid personnel, driving up the overall expenditure. Robust oversight and clear task orders are crucial to mitigate these risks.

What was the performance history of CACI, LLC on similar government contracts prior to this award?

The provided data does not include CACI, LLC's specific performance history on prior contracts. However, CACI is a large, established government contractor with extensive experience in providing IT and professional services to various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and Department of Justice. Their track record generally includes a wide range of support services. A thorough assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) for CACI on similar contracts to gauge their reliability, quality of service, and adherence to schedule and budget.

How has federal spending on litigation support services evolved since this contract was awarded?

Since the award of this contract (2009-2013), federal spending on litigation support services has likely evolved significantly, driven by advancements in technology and increasing caseloads. The rise of sophisticated e-discovery tools, artificial intelligence for document review, and data analytics has transformed the landscape. Agencies are likely seeking more integrated solutions and potentially more cost-effective methods for managing legal data. Spending patterns may have shifted towards technology-centric solutions and specialized firms focusing on data processing and analysis, potentially leading to different contract structures and pricing models than those prevalent during this contract's period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Legal Services › All Other Legal Services

Product/Service Code: TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SVCS. › TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 1100 N GLEBE RD, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,827,423

Exercised Options: $12,827,423

Current Obligation: $12,827,423

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJJ07C1521

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline