DOJ awards $32.1M to CACI for litigation support, with 4 bidders competing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,185,734 ($32.2M)

Contractor: CACI, LLC - Commercial

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2021-06-01

End Date: 2026-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: MEGA5 AUTOMATED LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $32.2 million to CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL for work described as: MEGA5 AUTOMATED LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the competitive bidding process. 2. Competition dynamics show a healthy level of interest from multiple bidders. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with contract type and duration being key factors. 4. Performance context is within the scope of automated litigation support services. 5. Sector positioning is within the legal services industry, supporting federal agencies.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $32.1 million over five years suggests a significant investment in litigation support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for automated litigation support services is challenging without more specific service details. However, the presence of four bidders indicates a competitive market, which typically drives more favorable pricing. The time and materials (T&M) contract type, while flexible, can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed, but the overall award value seems aligned with the scope of services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with four distinct bidders participating. This level of competition is generally positive, suggesting that the government sought a broad range of solutions and that multiple capable vendors were available. The presence of four bidders implies that the market is robust enough to support several players in this specialized legal services area, which should contribute to price discovery and potentially better value.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition with multiple bidders is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more competitive price than a sole-source or limited competition award. It ensures that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by leveraging market forces.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice benefits from enhanced capabilities in managing and processing large volumes of litigation data. Automated litigation support services are delivered, potentially speeding up legal processes and reducing manual effort. The geographic impact is primarily national, supporting federal legal operations across the United States. Workforce implications include the potential for specialized legal support roles within CACI and indirectly within the DOJ.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can lead to cost uncertainty if not managed diligently.
The duration of the contract (5 years) requires ongoing performance monitoring to ensure continued value.
Dependence on automated systems for critical legal functions introduces potential risks related to system failures or data integrity.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Multiple bidders (4) suggest a healthy competitive market for these services.
CACI, LLC is a known entity in government contracting, suggesting a degree of established capability.

Sector Analysis

The legal services sector within federal contracting is diverse, encompassing a wide range of support functions. Automated litigation support is a specialized niche focused on leveraging technology to manage discovery, evidence, and case files. This contract fits within the broader IT and professional services categories that support government operations. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without granular data on specific services, but the overall award size is substantial for a single delivery order.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, CACI, LLC, will likely handle the majority of the work. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless CACI voluntarily engages small businesses for specialized support.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Justice's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's statement of work and performance standards. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though specific performance details may be internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Legal Services Contracts
Information Technology Support Services
Automated Data Processing
Department of Justice Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to T&M contract type.
Need for robust government oversight to manage scope and performance.
Dependence on technology introduces risk of system performance issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $32.2 million to CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL. MEGA5 AUTOMATED LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-06-01. End: 2026-05-31.

What is CACI, LLC's track record with the Department of Justice and similar federal agencies for litigation support services?

CACI, LLC has a significant history of contracting with the Department of Justice and other federal agencies, often providing a range of IT and professional services. Their experience typically includes large-scale support contracts that may encompass elements of litigation support, data analysis, and IT infrastructure management. While specific performance metrics for past DOJ litigation support contracts are not detailed here, CACI's consistent presence as a prime contractor suggests a generally accepted level of capability and reliability in serving federal clients. Their broader portfolio includes work in areas like intelligence analysis, cybersecurity, and enterprise IT, indicating a capacity to handle complex, data-intensive projects relevant to legal support.

How does the $32.1 million award compare to historical spending on automated litigation support by the DOJ?

Comparing the $32.1 million award to historical DOJ spending on automated litigation support requires access to detailed historical procurement data. This single delivery order represents a substantial investment over its 5-year duration. However, without knowing the specific scope of services covered by this award and comparing it to the total annual or multi-year spending by the DOJ on similar services in previous years, a direct comparison is difficult. The DOJ, like many large federal agencies, handles a vast caseload, and the need for automated litigation support has likely grown with increasing data volumes. This award could represent a significant portion of their current spending in this area or be one of several contracts supporting different divisions or needs.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for automated litigation support?

The primary risk associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for automated litigation support is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the actual cost of materials. If the scope of work is not well-defined, or if project management is weak on either the government or contractor side, labor hours can escalate beyond initial estimates. This can lead to the total cost exceeding what might have been achieved with a fixed-price award. For automated litigation support, risks include extended data processing times, unforeseen technical challenges requiring more labor, or scope creep where additional services are requested without a formal change order that adjusts the ceiling price.

How effective are automated litigation support services in improving the efficiency of federal legal processes?

Automated litigation support services are generally considered highly effective in improving the efficiency of federal legal processes, particularly in managing large volumes of electronic discovery (e-discovery). These systems can rapidly search, categorize, and analyze vast datasets, identifying relevant documents and information far faster than manual review. This acceleration can significantly reduce the time and cost associated with discovery phases of litigation. By automating tasks like document review, privilege logging, and deposition preparation support, legal teams can focus more on strategic legal arguments rather than administrative data handling. The effectiveness is contingent on the quality of the software, the expertise of the personnel operating it, and the clear definition of the support required by the agency.

What is the typical market size and competitive landscape for automated litigation support services for federal agencies?

The market for automated litigation support services for federal agencies is substantial and growing, driven by increasing data volumes and the complexity of legal cases. While precise figures for the federal segment alone are difficult to isolate, the broader e-discovery and legal tech market is valued in the billions of dollars globally. The federal landscape includes a mix of large, established government contractors like CACI, as well as specialized legal technology firms. Competition is often robust, especially for larger contracts awarded under full and open competition, as demonstrated by the four bidders in this case. Key players often compete on technological capabilities, security clearances, past performance, and price. The trend towards digital transformation within government agencies further fuels demand for these services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Legal Services › All Other Legal Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1100 NORTH GLEBE ROAD, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,995,013

Exercised Options: $32,621,751

Current Obligation: $32,185,734

Actual Outlays: $29,626,720

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15JPSS20D00000368

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline