DOJ's $50M Litigation Support Contract Awarded to CACI, LLC Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $50,244,822 ($50.2M)

Contractor: CACI, LLC - Commercial

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2013-11-27

End Date: 2020-12-31

Contract Duration: 2,591 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF THIS CONTRACT WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL LITIGATION SUPPORT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ON AN INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY TASK ORDER BASIS. INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS ISSUED UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY SUPPORT ANY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION OR FEDERAL AGENCY ON A LOCAL AND/OR NATIONWIDE BASIS. SERVICES MAY BE REQUIRED ANYWHERE IN OR OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES AND ITS TERRITORIES. THIS CONTRACT WILL ALSO BE USED TO SUPPORT CASE- OR INVESTIGATION-RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $50.2 million to CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF THIS CONTRACT WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL LITIGATION SUPPORT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ON AN INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY TASK ORDER BASIS. INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS ISSUED UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY… Key points: 1. Contract provides broad litigation support services to DOJ and other federal agencies. 2. Services can be required domestically and internationally, indicating significant operational scope. 3. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. CACI, LLC, a commercial entity, is the awardee, highlighting private sector involvement in government legal support. 5. The indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) structure allows for flexible service deployment. 6. A significant portion of the contract value was realized through delivery orders. 7. The contract duration spanned over seven years, from late 2013 to the end of 2020.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total value of $50.2 million over seven years suggests a moderate annual spend for litigation support services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government contracts for legal and administrative support is necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the use of full and open competition generally supports competitive pricing. The contract's duration and the nature of the services indicate a sustained need, and the award to a single vendor implies a potentially strong relationship or specialized capability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data indicates four bids were received, suggesting a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive environment is generally expected to drive more favorable pricing and service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive pricing that full and open competition typically fosters, ensuring that government funds are used efficiently for essential litigation support services.

Public Impact

Federal agencies, primarily the Department of Justice, benefit from professional litigation support products and services. The services delivered encompass a wide range of administrative functions supporting legal cases and investigations. Geographic impact is nationwide and potentially international, supporting federal legal actions wherever they arise. The contract supports the operational capacity of federal legal departments, indirectly impacting the justice system's efficiency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in due to long-term contract and specialized services.
Reliance on a single vendor for critical litigation support could pose risks if performance falters.
Scope creep is a potential concern with IDIQ contracts if task orders are not carefully managed.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
CACI, LLC is a well-established government contractor with a track record in IT and professional services.
The contract structure allows for flexibility in meeting evolving agency needs.
Services support critical government functions, contributing to the administration of justice.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically legal services and administrative support. The market for government litigation support is substantial, with numerous firms competing for federal contracts. This particular contract's value of approximately $50 million over seven years represents a significant, but not exceptionally large, award within this sector. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large IDIQ contracts for legal support or administrative services awarded to major government contractors.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions or subcontracting goals for this contract. The award was made to CACI, LLC, a large commercial entity. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through this specific contract appears limited, unless CACI engages them as subcontractors, which is not detailed in the available information.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officers and program managers within the Department of Justice and any other utilizing federal agencies. The contract's IDIQ nature and delivery order basis mean oversight is applied at the task order level. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Litigation Support Services
Federal Legal Services Contracts
Professional and Technical Services IDIQ Contracts
Government Administrative Support Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure.
Risk of vendor lock-in with a single provider for critical services.
Need for robust oversight to manage scope and ensure performance on IDIQ task orders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $50.2 million to CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL. IGF::CT::IGF THIS CONTRACT WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL LITIGATION SUPPORT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ON AN INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY TASK ORDER BASIS. INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS ISSUED UNDER THIS CONTRACT MAY SUPPORT ANY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION OR FEDERAL AGENCY ON A LOCAL AND/OR NATIONWIDE BASIS. SERVICES MAY BE REQUIRED ANYWHERE IN OR OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES AND ITS TERRITORIES. THIS CONTRACT WILL ALSO BE U

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $50.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-11-27. End: 2020-12-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for litigation support services within the Department of Justice?

Historical spending on litigation support services by the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been substantial and varied, reflecting the department's vast caseload and complex legal needs. While specific aggregate data for 'litigation support' can be difficult to isolate without detailed category analysis, the DOJ consistently awards significant contracts for legal research, e-discovery, document management, expert witness services, and general administrative support for litigation. Contracts like the one awarded to CACI, LLC, valued at over $50 million, are indicative of the scale of investment. Trends often show an increasing reliance on technology-driven solutions for managing large volumes of discovery data and a continued need for specialized legal expertise. Spending can fluctuate based on major litigation initiatives, legislative changes, and departmental priorities. Analyzing historical spending requires examining various contract vehicles across different DOJ components, including the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys and specific litigating divisions.

How does CACI, LLC's performance on this contract compare to its other federal contracts?

Assessing CACI, LLC's performance on this specific $50.2 million litigation support contract requires access to detailed performance evaluations and past performance reviews, which are typically not publicly available in full. However, CACI is a large, established government contractor with a broad portfolio across defense, intelligence, and federal civilian agencies. Its performance on other contracts, particularly those involving professional services, IT, and administrative support, can offer indirect insights. Generally, CACI has a history of securing and performing on large, complex federal contracts. Publicly available contract data and award histories suggest a consistent ability to win competitive bids. Specific performance metrics like CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) ratings would be the most direct measure, but these are often proprietary. Without direct access to performance data for this specific contract, a comparative analysis relies on CACI's overall reputation and its success rate in winning and executing similar government contracts.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract?

Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts, like the one awarded for litigation support, present several inherent risks. A primary concern is scope creep, where the cumulative value and breadth of task orders may significantly exceed initial expectations or budget allocations without adequate justification or oversight. Another risk is the potential for vendor lock-in, especially if the chosen vendor develops unique capabilities or deep institutional knowledge that makes switching vendors difficult or costly. Pricing can also be a risk; while IDIQs often establish ceiling prices, the actual costs incurred depend on the specific task orders issued, and without careful management, costs could escalate. Furthermore, ensuring consistent quality and performance across numerous task orders issued over a long period requires robust government oversight. Finally, the flexibility that makes IDIQs attractive can sometimes lead to less predictable demand, potentially impacting resource allocation for both the government and the contractor.

What is the market size and competitive landscape for federal litigation support services?

The market for federal litigation support services is substantial and highly competitive, encompassing a wide range of needs from document review and e-discovery to expert witness management and trial support. Government agencies, particularly the Department of Justice, rely heavily on these services due to the sheer volume and complexity of legal cases they handle. The competitive landscape includes large, diversified government contractors like CACI, as well as specialized legal support firms and technology providers. Competition is often driven by factors such as technical expertise, cost-effectiveness, security clearances, and proven past performance. The market is characterized by a mix of large IDIQ contracts, like the one discussed, and smaller, more specialized procurements. Federal spending in this area is influenced by legislative priorities, enforcement initiatives, and the overall volume of litigation involving federal entities. The market size can be estimated in the billions of dollars annually when considering all related services across the federal government.

How does the 'Time and Materials' (T&M) contract type potentially impact cost control for this contract?

The contract utilized a 'Time and Materials' (T&M) pricing structure for task orders, which can present challenges for cost control compared to fixed-price contracts. In a T&M arrangement, the government pays the contractor for the actual labor hours expended at negotiated rates, plus the cost of materials used. While this offers flexibility, it places a greater burden on the government to meticulously monitor and manage contractor effort to prevent inefficiencies or overcharging. Without strong oversight, the contractor has less incentive to control labor hours, as increased hours directly translate to increased revenue. To mitigate this, effective T&M contracts require detailed tracking of hours, clear definitions of billable tasks, and vigilant program management to ensure that the effort is necessary and productive. The government must actively manage the scope and duration of work performed under T&M task orders to ensure value for money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Legal Services › All Other Legal Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 1100 NORTH GLEBE ROAD, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $50,244,822

Exercised Options: $50,244,822

Current Obligation: $50,244,822

Actual Outlays: $9,624,023

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJJ13C2439

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline