DOE's $11.27M contract for nuclear research consulting awarded to Longenecker & Associates, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,274,279 ($11.3M)
Contractor: Longenecker & Associates, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2007-01-30
End Date: 2012-11-30
Contract Duration: 2,131 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.3K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: CONSULTING&FACILITATION SERVICES FOR ADVANCED NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Place of Performance
Location: DEL MAR, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92014
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $11.3 million to LONGENECKER & ASSOCIATES, LLC for work described as: CONSULTING&FACILITATION SERVICES FOR ADVANCED NUCLEAR RESEARCH Key points: 1. Contract value of $11.27 million over approximately 5 years. 2. Awarded to Longenecker & Associates, LLC, a single entity. 3. Competition level was 'Competitive Delivery Order', suggesting multiple bids. 4. Contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks. 5. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting. 6. Geographic location of performance is California.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value of $11.27 million over five years averages to approximately $2.25 million annually. Without specific performance metrics or comparable contracts for advanced nuclear research consulting, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, can lead to higher costs if not closely managed compared to fixed-price contracts. Benchmarking against similar consulting services for specialized scientific research would be necessary for a more definitive evaluation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded as a 'Competitive Delivery Order', indicating that multiple vendors were likely considered or competed for this specific order. However, the limited information available does not specify the number of bidders or the extent of the competition. A competitive delivery order suggests a more open process than a sole-source award, but the specific level of competition is not fully detailed.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even for a delivery order, generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to a sole-source award.
Public Impact
Benefits the Department of Energy by providing specialized consulting for advanced nuclear research. Supports the advancement of nuclear energy technologies and research initiatives. Services are delivered in California, potentially impacting the local economy and workforce. The contract facilitates critical research that could have long-term energy implications.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Limited transparency on the specific number of bidders and the competitive process.
- Concentration of award to a single contractor for a significant duration.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive delivery order process.
- Contract supports critical advanced nuclear research for the Department of Energy.
- Contractor has a defined period of performance, allowing for focused engagement.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management and consulting services for government agencies. The market for specialized scientific and technical consulting, particularly in areas like advanced nuclear research, is often niche. The $11.27 million value is moderate for a multi-year federal consulting contract. Comparable spending might be found in other high-tech or scientific research support contracts across various federal agencies.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside requirement. The primary contractor, Longenecker & Associates, LLC, is the focus of this award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be tied to the delivery of services as outlined in the contract statement of work. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS, where contract awards are recorded. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Research and Development Programs
- Federal Consulting Services
- Advanced Nuclear Technology Initiatives
- Administrative Management Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
- Limited detail on the extent of competition for the delivery order.
- Concentration of award to a single contractor.
Tags
consulting, administrative-management, general-management, department-of-energy, advanced-nuclear-research, competitive-delivery-order, time-and-materials, california, longenecker-associates-llc, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $11.3 million to LONGENECKER & ASSOCIATES, LLC. CONSULTING&FACILITATION SERVICES FOR ADVANCED NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LONGENECKER & ASSOCIATES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-01-30. End: 2012-11-30.
What is the track record of Longenecker & Associates, LLC with the Department of Energy and similar federal contracts?
Information on Longenecker & Associates, LLC's specific track record with the Department of Energy or similar federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require reviewing their past performance on federal awards, including client satisfaction, adherence to timelines, and budget management. Examining their contract history for any performance issues, disputes, or successful project completions would offer insight into their reliability and capability for managing complex consulting engagements like advanced nuclear research support.
How does the $11.27 million contract value compare to similar consulting services for advanced nuclear research?
Benchmarking the $11.27 million contract value against similar consulting services for advanced nuclear research is challenging without access to a broader dataset of comparable federal contracts. The value represents an average annual spend of approximately $2.25 million over five years. Factors influencing this value include the specialized expertise required, the duration of the engagement, and the specific scope of work. A detailed comparison would necessitate identifying contracts with similar objectives, contractor types, and agencies to establish a relevant market rate or typical investment for such specialized consulting.
What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials contract for this type of service?
The primary risk associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for consulting services, especially in specialized fields like advanced nuclear research, is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M agreements reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours and associated costs. If project scope creeps, timelines extend, or labor hours are not meticulously tracked and managed, the total cost can significantly exceed initial estimates. This necessitates robust oversight from the government to ensure efficient work and prevent unnecessary expenditures.
How effective is the 'Competitive Delivery Order' mechanism in ensuring fair pricing for specialized consulting?
The 'Competitive Delivery Order' mechanism is intended to foster competition among pre-qualified vendors for specific task orders under a larger contract vehicle. This approach generally promotes fairer pricing than a sole-source award by allowing multiple bidders to propose solutions and pricing. However, the effectiveness in ensuring optimal pricing depends on the number of bidders, the clarity of the solicitation, and the rigor of the evaluation process. A highly competitive environment with well-defined requirements is more likely to yield competitive pricing for taxpayers.
What is the historical spending trend for administrative management and general management consulting services by the Department of Energy?
Analyzing the historical spending trend for administrative management and general management consulting services by the Department of Energy would require access to historical federal procurement data over several fiscal years. This contract, valued at $11.27 million over five years, represents a portion of the DOE's expenditure in this category. Understanding broader trends would involve examining the total annual spending on NAICS code 541611 by the DOE, identifying key contractors, and observing any fluctuations in spending related to specific research initiatives or administrative needs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2514 RED ARROW DRIVE, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89135
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,598,810
Exercised Options: $11,598,810
Current Obligation: $11,274,279
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0479N
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-01-30
Current End Date: 2012-11-30
Potential End Date: 2012-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-12-06
More Contracts from Longenecker & Associates, LLC
- E0711CL Provide Contract Support for Letterkenny Army Depot Maintenance Support — $40.6M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- UPF Project Management Office (PMO), Na-Apm-1.3, Provides Contract Management and Contract Oversight for Ongoing Capital Projects and Major Items of Equipment AT the Y-12 Site in OAK Ridge, Tennessee — $26.6M (Department of Energy)
- Requisition 19MA002029 WAS Created to Provide Project Management Support to the Department of Energy. the Period of Performance IS: Base Year: 09/13/19 to 09/12/20 Option Year 1: 09/13/20 to 09/12/21 Option Year 2: 09/13/21 to 09/12/22 Option YEA — $11.8M (Department of Energy)
- Program Management, Technical and Analytical Support Services for the Office of Material Management and Minimization (MMM) (NA-23) — $9.1M (Department of Energy)
- U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (doe/Nnsa) Office of Acquisition&project Management (na-Apm) Operational/Administrative Business Support Services — $3.9M (Department of Energy)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)