Department of Energy awards $9.1M contract for material management and minimization support to Longenecker & Associates
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $9,091,475 ($9.1M)
Contractor: Longenecker & Associates, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2019-09-16
End Date: 2026-03-24
Contract Duration: 2,381 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE OFFICE OF MATERIAL MANAGEMENT AND MINIMIZATION (MMM) (NA-23).
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $9.1 million to LONGENECKER & ASSOCIATES, LLC for work described as: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE OFFICE OF MATERIAL MANAGEMENT AND MINIMIZATION (MMM) (NA-23). Key points: 1. Contract provides essential program management and technical support for the Office of Material Management and Minimization. 2. The contract duration of approximately 6.5 years suggests a long-term need for these specialized services. 3. Awarded via full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified contractors. 4. The contract type is 'Labor Hours', which can offer flexibility but requires careful monitoring of effort. 5. The geographic location of performance is Washington D.C., a common hub for federal agency support services. 6. The small business status of the awardee is not applicable as the contract was not set aside.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $9.1 million over approximately 6.5 years appears reasonable for specialized program management and technical support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for program management and analytical support within the Department of Energy or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The 'Labor Hours' contract type allows for flexibility in resource allocation based on evolving needs, but it necessitates robust oversight to ensure efficient use of taxpayer funds and prevent cost overruns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of two bidders indicates a moderate level of competition for this specialized service. While more than one bidder is positive, a higher number of bids typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions. The agency's approach to full and open competition is a standard practice for ensuring fair market access.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve service quality. The presence of at least two bidders suggests that the government received multiple offers, increasing the likelihood of a fair market price being achieved.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Energy's Office of Material Management and Minimization (MMM), which receives critical support. Services delivered include program management, technical expertise, and analytical support essential for material management and minimization efforts. The geographic impact is concentrated in Washington D.C., where the performance is located. The contract supports specialized technical and managerial roles, potentially impacting the workforce in the D.C. area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost creep with 'Labor Hours' contract type if not closely monitored.
- Ensuring consistent quality of service delivery over the multi-year contract period.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical program management functions.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, promoting a fair marketplace.
- Long contract duration suggests stability and continuity of essential services.
- Contract addresses a critical function within the Department of Energy (material management and minimization).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically engineering services. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise to government agencies. The Department of Energy, like other federal bodies, relies on these services to manage complex technical and programmatic functions. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for program management and technical support within the energy sector or similar scientific agencies.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside. As such, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically mandated for small businesses through this award. The primary contractor, Longenecker & Associates, LLC, is responsible for its own subcontracting decisions, which may or may not involve small businesses depending on their operational needs and strategy.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. They are responsible for monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving payments. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS.gov. While specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues, the DOE Office of Inspector General typically oversees agency programs and contracts for waste, fraud, and abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Program Management Support
- Federal Technical and Analytical Services
- Office of Material Management and Minimization Operations
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to 'Labor Hours' contract type.
- Need for robust government oversight to ensure efficient service delivery.
- Contract duration requires long-term performance monitoring.
Tags
department-of-energy, program-management, technical-support, analytical-services, material-management, full-and-open-competition, labor-hours, washington-dc, engineering-services, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $9.1 million to LONGENECKER & ASSOCIATES, LLC. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE OFFICE OF MATERIAL MANAGEMENT AND MINIMIZATION (MMM) (NA-23).
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LONGENECKER & ASSOCIATES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $9.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-09-16. End: 2026-03-24.
What is the track record of Longenecker & Associates, LLC with the Department of Energy and other federal agencies?
A review of federal procurement data indicates that Longenecker & Associates, LLC has a history of receiving contracts from various federal agencies, including the Department of Energy. Their contract awards often pertain to program management, technical support, and consulting services. Analyzing the specific performance history, including any past performance evaluations or disputes, would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and effectiveness. Understanding their experience with similar material management or minimization programs would be particularly relevant for assessing their suitability for this specific contract.
How does the awarded value compare to similar program management support contracts within the Department of Energy?
The awarded value of approximately $9.1 million over roughly 6.5 years translates to an average annual value of about $1.4 million. To benchmark this effectively, one would need to compare it against other Department of Energy contracts for program management, technical, and analytical support services of similar scope and duration. Factors such as the specific expertise required, the complexity of the program being supported, and the geographic location of performance can influence pricing. Without direct comparisons to contracts with identical service requirements and market conditions, it is challenging to definitively state whether this represents superior or inferior value.
What are the primary risks associated with a 'Labor Hours' contract type for this service?
The 'Labor Hours' contract type, while offering flexibility, carries inherent risks related to cost control and contractor efficiency. The primary risk is that the total cost can escalate beyond initial estimates if the labor hours required are greater than anticipated or if labor rates are higher than expected. This necessitates rigorous oversight from the government to ensure that the contractor is not over-allocating hours or performing unnecessary work. There's also a risk that the contractor may prioritize billable hours over optimal project outcomes if not managed carefully. Effective management requires detailed tracking of hours, regular progress reviews, and clear performance metrics.
How effective is the Office of Material Management and Minimization (MMM) in achieving its stated goals, and how does this contract contribute?
Assessing the effectiveness of the Office of Material Management and Minimization (MMM) requires analyzing specific performance metrics and outcomes related to material management and minimization efforts, such as waste reduction rates, compliance adherence, and cost savings achieved through efficient material handling. This contract, by providing program management, technical, and analytical support, is intended to enhance MMM's operational capabilities and strategic planning. The contractor's role would likely involve supporting data analysis, process improvement initiatives, and ensuring the smooth execution of MMM's programs, thereby indirectly contributing to the office's overall effectiveness. A detailed evaluation of MMM's performance data would be needed to quantify the contract's specific impact.
What has been the historical spending trend for similar program management and technical support services at the Department of Energy?
Historical spending on program management and technical support services within the Department of Energy can fluctuate based on agency priorities, budget allocations, and the initiation of new programs or initiatives. Analyzing past spending data for similar service categories would reveal trends in demand and investment. For instance, periods of increased focus on environmental compliance, infrastructure upgrades, or research and development could lead to higher spending in these support service areas. Understanding these historical patterns can help contextualize the current contract's value and duration, and inform future budget planning for such essential services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 89233119QNA000091
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 106 CENTRAL PARK SQ, LOS ALAMOS, NM, 87544
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,006,123
Exercised Options: $11,006,123
Current Obligation: $9,091,475
Actual Outlays: $7,455,554
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F258CA
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-09-16
Current End Date: 2026-03-24
Potential End Date: 2026-03-24 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-13
More Contracts from Longenecker & Associates, LLC
- E0711CL Provide Contract Support for Letterkenny Army Depot Maintenance Support — $40.6M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- UPF Project Management Office (PMO), Na-Apm-1.3, Provides Contract Management and Contract Oversight for Ongoing Capital Projects and Major Items of Equipment AT the Y-12 Site in OAK Ridge, Tennessee — $26.6M (Department of Energy)
- Requisition 19MA002029 WAS Created to Provide Project Management Support to the Department of Energy. the Period of Performance IS: Base Year: 09/13/19 to 09/12/20 Option Year 1: 09/13/20 to 09/12/21 Option Year 2: 09/13/21 to 09/12/22 Option YEA — $11.8M (Department of Energy)
- Consulting&facilitation Services for Advanced Nuclear Research — $11.3M (Department of Energy)
- U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (doe/Nnsa) Office of Acquisition&project Management (na-Apm) Operational/Administrative Business Support Services — $3.9M (Department of Energy)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)