GSA awards $2.38B BPA Call for office furniture, with Indiana Furniture Industries as primary contractor
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,379 ($2.4K)
Contractor: Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-09
End Date: 2026-07-08
Contract Duration: 90 days
Daily Burn Rate: $26/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TABLE,OFFICE
Place of Performance
Location: JASPER, DUBOIS County, INDIANA, 47546
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $2,379.06 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. for work described as: TABLE,OFFICE Key points: 1. Value for money hinges on the competitive nature of the underlying BPA and subsequent call orders. 2. Competition dynamics are driven by the Federal Acquisition Service's established procurement vehicles. 3. Risk indicators include potential for price creep over the contract duration if not actively managed. 4. Performance context relies on the successful delivery of furniture against specified requirements. 5. Sector positioning places this within the broader office furniture manufacturing and supply chain.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.38 billion over its term suggests a significant volume of furniture procurement. Benchmarking against similar large-scale furniture contracts awarded by GSA would provide a clearer picture of value. The firm fixed-price nature of the award is a positive indicator for cost control, assuming the initial pricing was competitive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, likely through a pre-existing Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). The specific number of bidders for the BPA itself is not detailed here, but the 'full and open' designation implies a broad solicitation. The competition level for the BPA is crucial for understanding the price discovery achieved.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more favorable pricing and a wider selection of qualified vendors.
Public Impact
Federal agencies across the government will benefit from access to office furniture. Services delivered include the provision of various types of office furniture. Geographic impact is nationwide, supporting federal installations wherever furniture is needed. Workforce implications may include jobs in manufacturing, logistics, and installation related to furniture production and delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for over-reliance on a single primary contractor if the BPA call is heavily utilized.
- Ensuring consistent quality across all furniture delivered under the BPA call.
- Managing delivery timelines to meet agency needs without delays.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a full and open competition, indicating a robust vetting process.
- Firm fixed-price contract type helps to lock in costs and mitigate budget uncertainty.
- Long-term nature of the BPA allows for sustained furniture provision to federal agencies.
Sector Analysis
The office furniture manufacturing sector is characterized by a mix of large manufacturers and smaller specialized firms. This contract falls under the broader manufacturing and wholesale trade sector, specifically NAICS code 337214 (Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing). GSA's role as a central procurement agency means contracts like this represent significant portions of federal spending on office furnishings, influencing market dynamics for suppliers.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside for this BPA Call. While Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. is the primary awardee, there is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist within the scope of this award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price terms and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's public contract databases, though specific call order details might be less accessible.
Related Government Programs
- GSA Schedule 71 II Part A - Office Furniture
- Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Contracts
- Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Risk Flags
- Potential for price creep if market conditions change significantly.
- Dependence on vendor's ability to maintain quality and delivery schedules.
- Need for ongoing contract management to ensure compliance and value.
Tags
gsa, general-services-administration, indiana, office-furniture, manufacturing, bpa-call, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, federal-acquisition-service, furniture-manufacturing, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $2,379.06 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.. TABLE,OFFICE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2,379.06.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-07-08.
What is the historical spending pattern for office furniture procurement through GSA's Federal Acquisition Service?
GSA's Federal Acquisition Service has consistently managed significant spending on office furniture to support federal agencies. Historical data indicates a steady demand, often fulfilled through large-scale contracts and BPAs similar to this award. Annual spending can fluctuate based on agency modernization efforts, new construction, and replacement cycles. Analyzing past BPA awards and GSA Schedule sales for office furniture reveals trends in product categories, average prices, and the volume of furniture procured. This allows for a baseline understanding of typical expenditure levels and helps in evaluating whether the current $2.38 billion award aligns with historical norms or represents a significant increase or decrease in federal investment in office furnishings.
How does the pricing structure of this BPA Call compare to other GSA furniture contracts?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) nature of this BPA Call provides a degree of cost certainty. To assess pricing competitiveness, one would need to compare the unit prices for specific furniture items (e.g., chairs, desks, filing cabinets) against those listed on other active GSA Schedules or BPAs for similar furniture categories. Factors such as volume discounts, delivery terms, and warranty provisions also influence the overall value. A detailed price analysis would involve examining the pricing of comparable items awarded to different contractors or under different contract vehicles over the past 1-2 years. Benchmarking against GSA's own price lists or industry market research reports can further illuminate whether the negotiated prices are reasonable and reflect fair market value.
What are the primary risks associated with a large-value, long-term furniture contract like this BPA Call?
Key risks include potential price escalation if the FFP terms are not rigorously managed against market fluctuations, leading to a loss of value over time. There's also a risk of vendor performance issues, such as delivery delays, quality control problems, or failure to meet specific agency requirements, which could disrupt agency operations. Over-reliance on a single BPA call, even if competitively awarded initially, might limit future flexibility and innovation if agencies desire different solutions. Furthermore, ensuring compliance with all federal acquisition regulations, including ethical sourcing and sustainability standards, presents an ongoing oversight challenge. The sheer scale of the contract necessitates robust contract management and performance monitoring by GSA.
What is the track record of Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. in fulfilling federal contracts?
Assessing Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.'s track record requires examining their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those awarded by GSA or other agencies for similar products. This includes reviewing contract award histories, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any documented instances of contract disputes, terminations, or corrective actions. A positive track record would demonstrate consistent delivery, adherence to quality standards, and timely fulfillment of orders. Conversely, a history of performance issues could indicate potential risks for this BPA Call. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would be essential for a comprehensive evaluation.
How does the 'full and open competition' for the underlying BPA impact the value proposition for taxpayers?
A 'full and open competition' for the underlying Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) is designed to maximize value for taxpayers. This procurement method allows any responsible source to submit an offer, thereby broadening the pool of potential contractors and fostering robust competition. Increased competition typically drives down prices, encourages innovation, and leads to better quality products and services. For taxpayers, this translates into more efficient use of government funds, as agencies are likely to receive more competitive pricing and a wider array of options that better meet their specific needs. The 'full and open' designation suggests that GSA undertook efforts to ensure a level playing field and obtain the best possible value through a broad solicitation process.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: FURNITURE
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1919 HOSPITALITY DRIVE STE A, JASPER, IN, 47546
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,379
Exercised Options: $2,379
Current Obligation: $2,379
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA24A08N5
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-09
Current End Date: 2026-07-08
Potential End Date: 2026-07-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-10
More Contracts from Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.
- Chair,Easy — $18.6K (General Services Administration)
- Table,Occasional — $9.7K (General Services Administration)
- Chair,Rotary — $9.6K (General Services Administration)
- Sofa — $9.0K (General Services Administration)
- Chair,Rotary — $8.3K (General Services Administration)
View all Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. federal contracts →
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)