GSA awards $8.3M contract for rotary chairs, with Indiana Furniture Industries Inc. as the contractor

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,329 ($8.3K)

Contractor: Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-07-06

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $93/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CHAIR,ROTARY

Place of Performance

Location: JASPER, DUBOIS County, INDIANA, 47547

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $8,328.9 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. for work described as: CHAIR,ROTARY Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a BPA Call, indicating it's a call-off from a pre-existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. 3. The fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The contract duration is 90 days, suggesting a short-term need or a specific delivery requirement. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 337214 points to office furniture manufacturing. 6. The contractor, Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc., is based in Indiana, potentially supporting regional economic activity.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $8.3 million for office chairs over a 90-day period appears reasonable given the quantity and type of goods. Benchmarking against similar GSA schedule awards for office furniture would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control. Without specific unit details or comparison data, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the overall scale seems aligned with federal procurement needs for such items.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' which implies that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This method is generally preferred for maximizing competition and achieving the best possible prices. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a robust competitive environment was available for this requirement.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to lower prices through competitive bidding and ensures that government funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring office furniture, specifically rotary chairs, will benefit from this contract. The contract facilitates the procurement of essential office equipment for government workspaces. The geographic impact is primarily within the United States, supporting federal operations nationwide. Workforce implications may include support for manufacturing jobs within the office furniture sector, particularly at Indiana Furniture Industries.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition if the BPA itself was not widely competed.
Short contract duration might indicate a need for rapid fulfillment, potentially limiting supplier options.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor performance beyond delivery.
No indication of sustainability or environmental considerations in the contract details.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract protects against cost increases.
Contractor is an established entity, likely with experience in fulfilling government orders.
BPA Call mechanism streamlines the ordering process for agencies.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader office furniture manufacturing sector, a segment of the larger industrial and commercial goods market. The NAICS code 337214 specifically targets manufacturers of office furniture, excluding wood. Federal spending in this area is consistent with the ongoing need for equipping and maintaining federal workspaces. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing aggregate federal outlays for office furniture across various agencies and contract vehicles.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a specific set-aside criterion (ss: false, sb: false). While Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. may be a large business, the contract does not explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist within the fulfillment of this BPA Call and if they are being tracked.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service, which manages the underlying BPA. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards. Accountability would be managed through GSA's contract administration processes, ensuring delivery according to the BPA Call terms.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules Program
Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Office Furniture Procurement
Federal Workspace Modernization

Risk Flags

Short contract duration may limit flexibility for unforeseen issues.
Lack of detailed performance metrics requires reliance on general contract compliance.
Potential supply chain vulnerabilities for raw materials impacting delivery timelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $8,328.9 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.. CHAIR,ROTARY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,328.9.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-07-06.

What is the historical spending pattern for rotary chairs or similar office furniture under GSA contracts?

Analyzing historical spending data for rotary chairs and related office furniture under GSA contracts would reveal trends in demand, pricing fluctuations, and the prevalence of different contract vehicles (e.g., GSA Schedules, BPAs). For instance, if past data shows a significant increase in spending on office furniture during periods of federal workforce expansion or office relocation, it suggests that this contract aligns with ongoing operational needs. Conversely, a declining trend might indicate market saturation or a shift towards different types of workspace solutions. Understanding the average price paid per unit in previous procurements is crucial for benchmarking the value of the current $8.3 million award. This historical context helps determine if the current pricing is competitive and if the volume of procurement is consistent with previous federal requirements.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to other similar federal awards for office chairs?

To assess the pricing competitiveness of this $8.3 million contract for rotary chairs, a comparison with similar federal awards is essential. This involves identifying contracts with comparable specifications, quantities, and delivery timelines awarded through similar procurement methods (e.g., GSA Schedules, full and open competition). Key metrics for comparison include the price per unit, total contract value relative to the number of items, and any associated service costs. If this contract's unit price is significantly lower than the average for comparable awards, it suggests good value for money. Conversely, a higher unit price might indicate potential issues with pricing or a unique requirement justifying the cost. Benchmarking against market rates for commercial entities procuring similar volumes of office furniture can also provide valuable context for assessing value.

What are the specific performance expectations and metrics associated with this BPA Call?

The provided data indicates the contract is a 'BPA CALL' with a firm fixed price and a duration of 90 days. However, specific performance expectations and metrics are not detailed. Typically, for such procurements, performance expectations would revolve around timely delivery of the specified rotary chairs, adherence to quality standards (e.g., durability, ergonomic features), and compliance with any packaging or shipping instructions. Metrics might include on-time delivery rates, defect rates, and customer satisfaction scores post-delivery. Without these explicit metrics, assessing the contractor's performance beyond basic fulfillment is challenging. The General Services Administration (GSA) likely has standard performance clauses within the overarching BPA that would apply.

What is the track record of Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for office furniture?

Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.'s track record in fulfilling federal contracts is a critical factor in assessing the reliability and potential success of this $8.3 million award. Researching their past performance, including contract history with GSA and other federal agencies, would provide insights into their capacity, delivery timeliness, quality of products, and overall customer satisfaction. Specifically, examining previous awards for similar office furniture items would be most relevant. A history of successful contract completions, positive past performance reviews, and minimal disputes or contract terminations would indicate a lower risk profile. Conversely, a record marked by delays, quality issues, or contract disputes might raise concerns about their ability to meet the current contract's requirements effectively.

Are there any identified risks associated with this specific contract award or the contractor?

Assessing risks for this contract involves considering various factors. The 'full and open competition' suggests a competitive environment, which generally mitigates pricing risks. However, the short 90-day duration could pose a risk if there are unforeseen delays in manufacturing or delivery, potentially impacting agency operations. The firm fixed-price nature protects against cost overruns for the government but places the risk of increased input costs on the contractor. Contractor-specific risks would depend on Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.'s past performance, financial stability, and capacity to meet the demand within the specified timeframe. Without access to detailed past performance data or specific risk assessments conducted by GSA, identifying all potential risks is limited. However, general risks in furniture procurement can include supply chain disruptions or quality control issues.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1919 HOSPITALITY DRIVE STE A, JASPER, IN, 47546

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,329

Exercised Options: $8,329

Current Obligation: $8,329

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A000R

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline