GSA awards $9.7M contract to Indiana Furniture Industries for office furniture, highlighting potential value and competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $9,745 ($9.7K)
Contractor: Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-01
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 90 days
Daily Burn Rate: $108/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TABLE,OCCASIONAL
Place of Performance
Location: JASPER, DUBOIS County, INDIANA, 47547
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $9,745.12 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. for work described as: TABLE,OCCASIONAL Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 2. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 3. The contract duration of 90 days is relatively short, indicating a specific, potentially urgent need. 4. The award to Indiana Furniture Industries, a domestic manufacturer, supports U.S. industry. 5. The specific NAICS code points to a niche market within office furniture manufacturing. 6. The BPA Call award type suggests this is a call against an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $9.7 million for a 90-day period for office furniture manufacturing is substantial. Without specific benchmarks for similar BPA calls or the exact scope of furniture provided, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the use of full and open competition generally supports favorable pricing. The fixed-price nature of the contract also provides cost certainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The number of bidders is not specified, but the method itself suggests a robust selection process.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for obtaining the best value through a wide range of offers and competitive pricing.
Public Impact
Federal agencies requiring office furniture will benefit from the services and products delivered under this contract. The contract supports the manufacturing sector, specifically office furniture production. The geographic impact is primarily within Indiana, where the contractor is based, potentially creating or sustaining jobs there. The services delivered will likely include the supply of various types of office furniture.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited customization options due to fixed-price contract.
- Dependence on a single awardee for a significant furniture requirement within the BPA call's scope.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
- Fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability.
- Contractor is a domestic manufacturer, supporting U.S. industry.
- Short duration may indicate efficient fulfillment of a specific need.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the manufacturing sector, specifically the production of office furniture (NAICS 337214). The market for office furniture is diverse, serving both government and commercial clients. Government procurement of furniture is a significant segment, often managed through large-scale agreements like Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) to streamline purchasing. Benchmarks for spending in this category vary widely based on the type and quantity of furniture required.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Mechanisms include contract performance monitoring, adherence to the terms of the BPA call, and potentially reviews by GSA's Office of Inspector General if performance issues or irregularities arise. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases.
Related Government Programs
- GSA Federal Supply Schedule
- Office Furniture Procurement
- Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Risk Flags
- Short performance period for a high-value contract may indicate execution risk.
- Lack of detail on competition level (number of bidders) limits assessment of price discovery.
- No explicit small business subcontracting goals mentioned.
Tags
gsa, general-services-administration, indiana, office-furniture, manufacturing, full-and-open-competition, bpa-call, firm-fixed-price, federal-acquisition-service, domestic-supplier
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $9,745.12 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.. TABLE,OCCASIONAL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $9,745.12.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-06-30.
What is the typical lead time for office furniture orders of this magnitude from Indiana Furniture Industries?
The contract specifies a duration of 90 days for the period of performance, which includes the delivery and completion of services. However, this 90-day window likely refers to the overall contract period rather than the lead time for a specific order. Indiana Furniture Industries, as a manufacturer, would have its own production lead times. For a contract valued at $9.7 million, the lead time for fulfilling the entire requirement could extend beyond the initial performance period if not managed efficiently. Typical lead times for large furniture orders can range from several weeks to a few months, depending on product complexity, customization, and current manufacturing backlogs. The government would expect timely delivery within the contract's performance period.
How does the $9.7 million award compare to historical GSA spending on office furniture?
Comparing this $9.7 million award to historical GSA spending on office furniture requires access to detailed GSA procurement data. GSA procures billions of dollars in goods and services annually, including substantial amounts for furniture. This specific award represents a significant single BPA call, but its proportion within GSA's overall furniture spending would depend on the total annual expenditure. Historically, GSA has utilized various contract vehicles, including Federal Supply Schedules and IDIQs, to procure office furniture. The value of individual awards can fluctuate based on agency needs, market conditions, and the scope of agreements like BPAs. Without specific historical data points for comparable BPA calls or overall furniture spending, it's difficult to definitively state if $9.7 million is high or low in context.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) likely being tracked for this contract?
Key performance indicators for this office furniture contract would likely focus on delivery timeliness, product quality, and adherence to specifications. Specific KPIs could include on-time delivery rates, defect rates (e.g., damage during shipping or manufacturing flaws), compliance with product specifications (dimensions, materials, finishes), and customer satisfaction post-delivery. For a BPA call, meeting the terms and conditions of the underlying BPA and the specific call order is paramount. Performance metrics would be crucial for ensuring the government receives the intended value and that the contractor meets its obligations within the fixed-price framework.
What is the risk associated with a 90-day contract duration for this value?
A 90-day duration for a $9.7 million contract presents a moderate to high risk related to the pace of execution. This short timeframe suggests either a very specific, urgent need for furniture or that this BPA call is for a limited quantity or a specific phase of a larger requirement. The risk lies in the contractor's ability to procure materials, manufacture, and deliver a substantial amount of furniture within such a compressed schedule without compromising quality or incurring additional costs that could lead to claims. For the government, the risk includes potential delays if the contractor underperforms, impacting agency operations. Effective project management and clear communication from both parties are critical to mitigate these risks.
Does the NAICS code 337214 provide sufficient detail about the specific types of office furniture being procured?
NAICS code 337214, 'Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing,' provides a broad classification for the industry but may not detail the specific types of office furniture procured under this contract. This code covers establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing metal, plastic, glass, or upholstered office furniture, excluding wood furniture. Therefore, the contract could encompass a wide range of items such as metal filing cabinets, office chairs, desks, partitions, and shelving. To understand the precise nature of the furniture, one would need to examine the detailed contract statement of work (SOW) or the specific BPA call order, which would list the exact items, quantities, and specifications required.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: FURNITURE
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1919 HOSPITALITY DRIVE STE A, JASPER, IN, 47546
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $9,745
Exercised Options: $9,745
Current Obligation: $9,745
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A000R
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-01
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-02
More Contracts from Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.
- Chair,Easy — $18.6K (General Services Administration)
- Chair,Rotary — $9.6K (General Services Administration)
- Sofa — $9.0K (General Services Administration)
- Chair,Rotary — $8.3K (General Services Administration)
- Chair,Rotary — $8.2K (General Services Administration)
View all Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. federal contracts →
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)