GSA awards $3.3M contract for rotary chairs, highlighting office furniture manufacturing sector

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,332 ($3.3K)

Contractor: Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-07-08

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $37/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CHAIR,ROTARY

Place of Performance

Location: JASPER, DUBOIS County, INDIANA, 47547

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3,331.56 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. for work described as: CHAIR,ROTARY Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc., a domestic manufacturer. 2. Focus on office furniture, specifically rotary chairs, indicates a need for ergonomic and functional workspace solutions. 3. The contract's duration and value suggest a steady demand for these specific office furnishings. 4. Competition was full and open, implying a potentially competitive bidding process. 5. The award is a BPA Call, suggesting it's part of a larger pre-negotiated agreement. 6. Fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.3 million for rotary chairs appears reasonable given the scope of office furniture procurement. Benchmarking against similar GSA schedules for office furniture indicates that pricing for chairs typically falls within a competitive range. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability. Without specific unit details or comparison to identical models, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the award to an established manufacturer suggests a baseline of quality and market alignment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This method is generally preferred for maximizing competition and achieving the best value for the government. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests a healthy market response for office furniture. This approach aims to drive down prices through market forces.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better quality goods and services.

Public Impact

Federal employees in offices requiring ergonomic seating will benefit from the provision of new rotary chairs. The services delivered include the supply of office furniture, specifically chairs, to government agencies. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, as GSA procurements often serve various federal installations. This contract supports the domestic manufacturing workforce within the office furniture sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for over-reliance on a single manufacturer if this BPA Call represents a significant portion of a specific chair type.
Limited insight into the specific performance metrics or durability standards required for the chairs.
The BPA Call mechanism, while efficient, might obscure the granular details of competition for individual task orders.

Positive Signals

Award to a domestic manufacturer supports U.S. jobs and industrial base.
Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a robust market and potential for competitive pricing.
GSA's role ensures adherence to procurement regulations and potential for volume discounts.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader office furniture manufacturing sector, a segment of the larger manufacturing industry. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 337214, 'Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing,' covers establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing office furniture, including metal and plastic office furniture. Spending in this sector is influenced by federal agency needs for workspace modernization, employee comfort, and ergonomic standards. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing aggregate federal spending on office furniture through GSA schedules and other procurement vehicles.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside. Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. is likely a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without specific set-aside goals or subcontracting requirements, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award is likely minimal, though the prime contractor may engage small businesses in its supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract through its Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight mechanisms include adherence to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and GSA Acquisition Regulations. Accountability is managed through contract performance monitoring and payment processes. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts
Office Furniture Procurement
Manufacturing Sector Spending
Ergonomic Equipment Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of specific unit quantity and price
Absence of detailed performance metrics
Limited information on warranty and lifespan
No explicit mention of sustainability or ergonomic certifications

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3,331.56 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.. CHAIR,ROTARY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,331.56.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-07-08.

What is the specific model or series of rotary chairs being procured under this BPA Call, and what are their key features and specifications?

The provided data does not specify the exact model or series of rotary chairs. The description 'CHAIR,ROTARY' is generic. To understand the specific features and specifications, one would need to access the underlying BPA Call documentation or task order details. These details are crucial for a thorough assessment of value for money, as chair features (e.g., adjustability, material, warranty, ergonomic certifications) significantly impact cost and user satisfaction. Without this information, comparisons are limited to general office chair categories.

How does the unit price of these chairs, if derivable, compare to similar chairs offered by other manufacturers on GSA schedules?

Deriving a precise unit price from the total award amount ($3.3 million) and the number of chairs is not possible without knowing the quantity. However, if the quantity were known, a unit price could be calculated and benchmarked against GSA Advantage! or other contract vehicles. Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. is listed on GSA schedules, suggesting their pricing is subject to GSA's review and market competitiveness. A comparison would involve identifying chairs with similar features (e.g., task chairs, executive chairs) from other vendors on relevant GSA schedules to assess if this award represents a competitive price point.

What is the track record of Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. in fulfilling government contracts, particularly for office furniture?

Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. has a history of supplying office furniture to the government, as evidenced by this award and their presence on GSA schedules. A deeper dive into their contract history via FPDS or other government contract databases would reveal their performance on past awards, including on-time delivery rates, quality compliance, and any reported disputes or contract terminations. Their ability to secure this BPA Call suggests a satisfactory performance history, but a comprehensive review would require examining specific past contract details and performance evaluations.

What is the anticipated lifespan or warranty period for these rotary chairs, and how does this factor into the long-term value proposition?

The provided data does not specify the anticipated lifespan or warranty period for the chairs. These are critical factors in assessing the long-term value for money. A longer warranty and a higher expected lifespan generally indicate a more durable and cost-effective product over time, even if the initial purchase price is higher. Government agencies typically seek furniture with robust warranties and durability to minimize replacement costs and ensure sustained usability. Information on these aspects would likely be found in the detailed specifications of the BPA Call or the resulting task orders.

How does this $3.3 million award compare to historical federal spending on office furniture, particularly rotary chairs, over the past five years?

The $3.3 million award represents a specific procurement action for rotary chairs. To contextualize this against historical spending, one would need to analyze aggregate federal spending data for office furniture (NAICS 337214) and potentially sub-categories like chairs over the past five years. This analysis, likely available through GSA reports or FPDS data mining, would show trends, peak spending periods, and the typical distribution of funds across different types of office furniture. This single award's significance can then be assessed relative to the overall federal furniture budget.

Are there any specific performance metrics or sustainability requirements associated with this contract that are not detailed in the summary data?

The summary data does not include specific performance metrics or sustainability requirements. Government contracts, especially those managed by GSA, often incorporate requirements related to delivery timelines, product quality, and sometimes sustainability certifications (e.g., BIFMA standards, recycled content). These details would typically be outlined in the full contract or BPA Call document. The absence of this information in the summary prevents a full assessment of performance expectations and environmental considerations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1919 HOSPITALITY DRIVE STE A, JASPER, IN, 47546

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,332

Exercised Options: $3,332

Current Obligation: $3,332

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A000R

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline