GSA awards $3.7M BPA Call to Indiana Furniture Industries for office furniture, with a 90-day duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,700 ($3.7K)

Contractor: Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-07-07

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $41/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SOFA

Place of Performance

Location: JASPER, DUBOIS County, INDIANA, 47547

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3,699.99 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. for work described as: SOFA Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the fixed-price nature and the specific product category. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm fixed-price contract and a short duration. 4. Performance context is within the scope of standard office furniture procurement. 5. Sector positioning is within the broader manufacturing and office supply sector for government agencies.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $3.7 million for office furniture is within a typical range for large federal procurements. As a BPA Call, it likely leverages pre-negotiated rates from a larger Basic Ordering Agreement, which can offer some level of price assurance. However, without direct comparison to similar recent BPA Calls or individual item pricing, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure mitigates cost overrun risks for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific mechanism, a BPA Call, suggests it was likely competed among pre-qualified vendors on an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. The level of competition for the underlying BPA would influence price discovery, but the call itself likely involved a competitive process among those on the BPA.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more favorable pricing and a wider selection of quality goods and services.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring office furniture will benefit from this contract. The services delivered include the provision of office furniture, likely including desks, chairs, and storage solutions. The geographic impact is national, as federal agencies across the country can utilize this BPA Call. Workforce implications are primarily within the manufacturing and logistics sectors related to furniture production and delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for overstocking or obsolescence if demand forecasting is inaccurate.
Delivery timelines could be impacted by supply chain disruptions in the furniture manufacturing sector.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract limits cost uncertainty for the government.
Short duration (90 days) allows for frequent re-evaluation of needs and vendor performance.
Award to an established manufacturer suggests product quality and reliability.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture market for the federal government is a significant segment within the broader office supply and manufacturing industries. This contract falls under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 337214 for Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing. Spending in this category is influenced by agency needs for workspace modernization, relocation, and replacement of aging assets. Benchmarks for comparable federal spending would typically be found within GSA schedules and other agency-specific furniture procurements.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. While Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. is a large business, the contract itself does not mandate subcontracting to small businesses. Future opportunities for small businesses may arise if they are suppliers to Indiana Furniture Industries or if they participate in future competitive procurements for similar items.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability is ensured through the firm fixed-price contract terms and the defined delivery schedule. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules
Office Furniture Procurement
BPA Calls
Federal Workspace Modernization

Risk Flags

Short contract duration may limit long-term vendor relationship building.
Reliance on a single BPA Call might not capture the full spectrum of furniture needs.
Potential for price increases if market conditions change significantly during the contract period.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3,699.99 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.. SOFA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,699.99.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-07-07.

What is the typical profit margin for office furniture manufacturers selling to the federal government under firm fixed-price contracts?

Determining the exact profit margin for office furniture manufacturers selling to the federal government is complex, as it depends on numerous factors including the specific product mix, production costs, overhead, competition, and the negotiated price. Firm fixed-price contracts aim to shift the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, implying that the contractor has factored in a reasonable profit margin while ensuring the price remains competitive. Industry benchmarks for manufacturing profit margins can range widely, but for government contracts, they are often expected to be within a reasonable range, typically between 5-15%, though this can vary significantly. The GSA's role in negotiating schedules and overseeing procurements aims to ensure fair and reasonable pricing, but specific profit margins are proprietary information unless revealed through audits or specific contract clauses.

How does the pricing of this BPA Call compare to similar office furniture procurements by GSA in the last fiscal year?

A direct comparison of this specific BPA Call's pricing to other similar office furniture procurements by GSA in the last fiscal year requires access to detailed pricing data for individual items or categories within each contract. As this is a $3.7 million BPA Call with a 90-day duration, it represents a specific, short-term procurement action. GSA's Federal Acquisition Service manages numerous contracts and schedules, including those for office furniture. Benchmarking would involve analyzing the unit prices for comparable items (e.g., specific chair models, desk types) awarded under other GSA schedules or BPAs during the same period. Without access to that granular data, it's difficult to definitively state if this BPA Call's pricing is higher or lower. However, the 'full and open competition' aspect suggests an effort to achieve competitive pricing.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used by GSA to evaluate the performance of office furniture suppliers like Indiana Furniture Industries?

GSA typically evaluates contractor performance through various Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that can include on-time delivery, order accuracy, product quality, responsiveness to inquiries, and adherence to contract terms. For furniture procurements, specific KPIs might involve the condition of delivered goods, the completeness of orders, and the efficiency of the installation or delivery process if applicable. Performance is often tracked through systems like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), where contracting officers provide assessments. Consistent positive performance is crucial for contractors to remain eligible for future task orders or BPAs under larger agreements. Negative performance can lead to corrective actions or exclusion from future opportunities.

What is the historical spending trend for office furniture under GSA's Federal Acquisition Service over the past five years?

Historical spending on office furniture through GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) has generally been substantial, reflecting the ongoing needs of federal agencies for workspace outfitting and refurbishment. While precise figures fluctuate annually based on agency budgets, modernization initiatives, and infrastructure projects, GSA consistently procures significant volumes of office furniture. Trends often show a steady demand, with potential increases during periods of major government reorganization, agency relocations, or significant investments in upgrading federal workspaces. GSA's role is to consolidate this demand, leverage purchasing power, and ensure competitive pricing. Specific year-over-year spending data would be available through GSA's public reports and contract databases, often categorized by product type and procurement vehicle.

Are there any specific sustainability or environmental requirements mandated for office furniture procured under this BPA Call?

Federal procurement policies increasingly emphasize sustainability and environmental considerations. While the provided data does not explicitly state sustainability requirements for this specific BPA Call, it is highly probable that Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. must comply with relevant federal mandates. These could include requirements for recycled content, low volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, energy efficiency in manufacturing, and end-of-life recyclability, often guided by standards such as GREENGUARD or BIFMA LEVEL. GSA actively promotes the procurement of sustainable products. Contractors are typically expected to provide documentation or certifications to demonstrate compliance with these environmental standards, ensuring that the furniture procured meets federal sustainability goals.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1919 HOSPITALITY DRIVE STE A, JASPER, IN, 47546

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,700

Exercised Options: $3,700

Current Obligation: $3,700

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A000R

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline