GSA awards $693,830 contract for 4x4 crew cab chassis to Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $69,383 ($69.4K)

Contractor: Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-12-06

Contract Duration: 240 days

Daily Burn Rate: $289/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X4 CAB AND CHASSIS, CREW CAB, MIN 16,001 LBS GVWR

Place of Performance

Location: OKARCHE, CANADIAN County, OKLAHOMA, 73762

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $69,383 to CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C. for work described as: 4X4 CAB AND CHASSIS, CREW CAB, MIN 16,001 LBS GVWR Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process with specific justifications. 2. The contract is for a firm-fixed-price delivery order, providing cost certainty for the government. 3. The duration of the contract is 240 days, suggesting a focused procurement for specific needs. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336110 points to the automobile and light duty motor vehicle manufacturing sector. 5. The contract is for a specialized vehicle: a 4x4 crew cab chassis with a minimum GVWR of 16,001 lbs. 6. The awardee, Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C., is based in Oklahoma, potentially indicating regional economic impact.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $693,830 for a specialized vehicle chassis appears reasonable given the specifications. Benchmarking against similar government procurements for heavy-duty crew cab chassis would provide a more definitive assessment of value. The firm-fixed-price structure helps manage cost risks for the government. Without specific details on the exact configuration and options included, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This suggests that while the competition was intended to be broad, there were specific reasons for excluding certain sources, which were likely documented and justified. The presence of 5 bids indicates a degree of competition, but the 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation into the specific parameters that defined the competitive pool.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive process, even with exclusions, aims to secure the best value for taxpayers. The number of bids suggests that multiple vendors were interested and capable of meeting the requirements, which generally leads to more favorable pricing than a sole-source award.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring specialized heavy-duty 4x4 crew cab chassis for operational needs will benefit from this procurement. The contract facilitates the acquisition of essential vehicles for government operations, potentially supporting logistics, transportation, or specialized mission requirements. The geographic impact is primarily centered around the awardee's location in Oklahoma, with potential for broader national distribution of the vehicles. The contract supports the automotive manufacturing and dealership sector, contributing to employment and economic activity within that industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' clause requires careful review to ensure it did not unduly limit competition and potentially inflate prices.
Lack of detailed specifications for the chassis makes it difficult to assess if the most cost-effective solution was procured.
The relatively short contract duration (240 days) might indicate a specific, time-sensitive need, but could also suggest a lack of long-term strategic planning for vehicle acquisition.

Positive Signals

The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a broad market was considered.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides budget certainty and shifts cost risk to the contractor.
The receipt of 5 bids indicates sufficient market interest and capability to meet the government's requirements.

Sector Analysis

The automotive manufacturing and light-duty vehicle sector is a significant part of the U.S. economy. Government procurements, like this one, contribute to demand within this sector. The NAICS code 336110 specifically covers the manufacturing of automobiles and light-duty motor vehicles. This contract fits within the broader category of government vehicle acquisition, which is a recurring need across various federal agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the average cost of similar heavy-duty chassis procured by agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) or the Department of Defense.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false) and there is no explicit mention of small business subcontracting requirements (sb: false). This suggests that the primary focus of this procurement was on obtaining the required vehicles through the most competitive means available, without a specific mandate to engage small businesses. Consequently, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem may be limited unless Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C. voluntarily utilizes small business subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically employs robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including this delivery order. The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) manages many GSA procurements, ensuring compliance with federal acquisition regulations. Accountability is maintained through the firm-fixed-price contract terms, performance expectations, and potential for audits. Transparency is generally provided through contract award databases like FPDS-NG (Federal Procurement Data System - Next Generation), where details of such awards are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Purchasing
Department of Defense Vehicle Procurement
Law Enforcement Vehicle Acquisition Programs
General Services Administration Multiple Award Schedules (MAS)

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources'.
Need for detailed technical specifications to ensure value for money.
Contractor performance history requires verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $69,383 to CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C.. 4X4 CAB AND CHASSIS, CREW CAB, MIN 16,001 LBS GVWR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $69,383.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-12-06.

What specific justifications were provided for the exclusion of certain sources in this 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award?

The justification for excluding specific sources in a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award typically stems from requirements that only certain vendors can meet, or from previous performance issues with other vendors. For instance, the requirement for a specific GVWR (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating) of 16,001 lbs or higher, coupled with a 4x4 crew cab chassis configuration, might necessitate specialized manufacturing capabilities or chassis designs that not all manufacturers possess. Alternatively, if a previous contract with a particular vendor resulted in poor performance, that vendor might be excluded. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 6 outlines the principles for competitive contracting, and any exclusion must be documented and justified to ensure fair and open competition to the maximum extent practicable. Without access to the specific contract file documentation, the precise reasons for exclusion remain speculative but would be rooted in ensuring the government receives the best value and meets its unique requirements.

How does the price of $693,830 for this specialized chassis compare to market rates for similar vehicles?

Determining the precise market rate for this specialized chassis requires detailed specifications beyond what is provided. However, based on general market knowledge for heavy-duty 4x4 crew cab chassis with a GVWR exceeding 16,000 lbs, prices can range significantly. Factors such as engine type, transmission, specific body configurations, and included options heavily influence the final cost. For a government contract, especially one awarded competitively, the price is expected to be at or below market rates due to bulk purchasing power and competitive bidding. A comparison would involve looking at commercial price lists for comparable models from manufacturers like Ford (Super Duty F-250/F-350), Ram (2500/3500), or Chevrolet/GMC (Silverado HD/Sierra HD) with similar specifications, adjusted for any government fleet discounts. The $693,830 figure, if it represents multiple units or a highly specialized configuration, might be within a reasonable range, but a direct unit-cost comparison is needed for a definitive assessment.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for specialized vehicles?

Firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally favored for their cost certainty, as the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns. However, for specialized vehicles, there can be risks. If the specifications are not perfectly defined, the contractor might deliver a vehicle that meets the letter but not the spirit of the requirement, leading to potential disputes or the need for costly modifications. Conversely, if the contractor underestimated the complexity or cost of meeting the specialized requirements, they might attempt to cut corners on quality or service, impacting long-term reliability. Another risk is that the contractor may price in a significant contingency to cover unforeseen issues, potentially leading to a higher initial price than a cost-reimbursement contract might have achieved if costs were well-managed. Ensuring thorough technical specifications and robust quality assurance are critical to mitigating these risks.

What is the typical track record of Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C. in fulfilling government contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C. in fulfilling government contracts is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their track record, one would typically consult government contract databases such as the Federal Procurement Data System - Next Generation (FPDS-NG) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). These systems would reveal past performance ratings, any history of contract disputes, on-time delivery performance, and overall satisfaction levels from previous government clients. Without access to this specific performance data, it is difficult to ascertain their reliability and experience with government procurements. However, being awarded a contract by the GSA suggests they have met certain basic qualifications and potentially have prior experience.

How does the General Services Administration (GSA) ensure accountability for delivery orders like this one?

The GSA ensures accountability for delivery orders through several mechanisms. Firstly, the contract itself, being firm-fixed-price, establishes clear financial terms and deliverables. The GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) often manages these procurements, employing contracting officers who are responsible for overseeing contract performance and compliance. Performance standards are typically outlined in the contract's statement of work or specifications. If the contractor fails to meet these standards, the GSA can take corrective actions, which may include withholding payments, demanding remedies, or even terminating the contract. Furthermore, the GSA utilizes systems like CPARS to document contractor performance, which influences future award decisions. Transparency is also a key accountability measure, with contract awards being publicly reported.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA22R0014

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 214 W OKLAHOMA, OKARCHE, OK, 73762

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $69,383

Exercised Options: $69,383

Current Obligation: $69,383

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA23D000B

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline