GSA awards $68.6K for 4x4 stake bed trucks, highlighting competitive procurement for essential fleet vehicles

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $68,578 ($68.6K)

Contractor: Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2027-08-08

Contract Duration: 485 days

Daily Burn Rate: $141/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X4 STAKE BED TRUCK, REGULAR CAB, MIN 10,001 LBS GVWR DRW

Place of Performance

Location: OKARCHE, CANADIAN County, OKLAHOMA, 73762

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $68,578 to CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C. for work described as: 4X4 STAKE BED TRUCK, REGULAR CAB, MIN 10,001 LBS GVWR DRW Key points: 1. The contract value appears reasonable for a specialized vehicle, but a detailed cost breakdown would confirm value. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a healthy market and potential for competitive pricing. 3. The contract duration is substantial, indicating a long-term need for these vehicles within the agency. 4. This procurement supports the operational needs of the General Services Administration's fleet management. 5. The vehicle specifications are precise, ensuring the acquired trucks meet specific operational requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award of $68,578 for a 4x4 stake bed truck with a minimum 10,001 lbs GVWR appears within a reasonable range for specialized government fleet vehicles. Benchmarking against similar GSA fleet procurements or commercial sales of comparable trucks would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price contract structure shifts risk to the contractor, which is generally favorable for the government when specifications are clear.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded for documented reasons. The presence of 5 bids suggests a competitive environment, which typically leads to better price discovery and value for the government. The specific number of bidders is a positive sign for market engagement.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, with multiple bids received, suggests that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently by leveraging market forces to secure a fair price for these essential vehicles.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring specialized utility trucks for operational tasks will benefit from this procurement. The services delivered include the provision of durable, heavy-duty trucks essential for logistics and maintenance. The geographic impact is likely national, as GSA manages federal vehicle fleets across the United States. This contract supports jobs in the automotive manufacturing and dealership sectors, specifically for specialized vehicle production and sales.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for higher costs if excluded sources offered significantly better pricing.
Long-term contract duration could lead to price increases if market conditions change unfavorably.
Dependence on a single vehicle model might limit future flexibility if needs evolve.

Positive Signals

Competitive bidding process likely secured a favorable price.
Clear vehicle specifications reduce the risk of receiving unsuitable equipment.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader automotive manufacturing and sales sector, specifically focusing on commercial vehicles. The market for government fleet vehicles is substantial, with agencies like GSA playing a key role in procurement. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other GSA or agency awards for similar truck types, considering factors like GVWR, cab type, and specific features like stake beds.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific award, as the 'small business' flag is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements in the provided data. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if opportunities were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) typically oversees such procurements, employing established acquisition regulations and policies. Oversight mechanisms include contract performance monitoring, payment reviews, and adherence to Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General audits may be conducted periodically to ensure compliance and prevent fraud.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Procurement
Federal Vehicle Acquisition
Commercial Vehicle Contracts
Heavy Duty Truck Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for price inflation due to exclusion of sources.
Long contract duration may expose government to market volatility.
Need for detailed cost breakdown to fully assess value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $68,578 to CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C.. 4X4 STAKE BED TRUCK, REGULAR CAB, MIN 10,001 LBS GVWR DRW

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $68,578.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2027-08-08.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar 4x4 stake bed trucks by the GSA?

Analyzing historical spending for similar 4x4 stake bed trucks by the GSA requires accessing detailed contract databases. Typically, GSA procures vehicles through various mechanisms, including indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts and direct awards. Past awards for comparable vehicles would reveal trends in pricing, quantities, and the number of bidders over time. For instance, if GSA has consistently awarded similar trucks in the $60,000-$75,000 range over the last five years, this current award of $68,578 would align with historical norms. Conversely, a significant deviation, either higher or lower, would warrant further investigation into market conditions, vehicle specifications, or procurement strategy changes. Examining the duration and value of previous contracts can also indicate the agency's long-term fleet planning and budget allocation for such assets.

How does the awarded price compare to commercial market rates for a similar vehicle?

To compare the awarded price of $68,578 to commercial market rates, one would need to identify comparable vehicles from manufacturers like Ford, Ram, or other truck brands, equipped with similar specifications (4x4, regular cab, minimum 10,001 lbs GVWR, stake bed). Commercial pricing can vary significantly based on dealer markups, available incentives, and optional features. However, a preliminary search for new heavy-duty trucks with these capabilities often places them in a similar price bracket, potentially ranging from $55,000 to $80,000 or more depending on customization. The government's negotiated price, especially under full and open competition, is expected to be competitive. If the commercial market for such a specialized configuration is typically higher, this award could represent good value. Conversely, if commercial prices are substantially lower, it might suggest an opportunity for better negotiation or a need to re-evaluate the necessity of certain specifications.

What are the specific risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for this type of vehicle?

The primary risk associated with a firm fixed-price (FFP) contract for vehicles like this 4x4 stake bed truck is that the contractor assumes all cost overruns. If the manufacturer experiences unexpected increases in raw material costs, labor, or transportation, Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C. would absorb these increases, potentially impacting their profit margin or leading them to cut corners on quality if not closely monitored. For the government, the risk is that the initial price might be inflated to account for the contractor's perceived risk. However, with clear specifications and a competitive bidding process, the risk of inflated pricing is mitigated. Another risk could be contractor default or failure to deliver, though this is generally low for established dealerships. The long contract duration (485 days) also introduces a risk of market price fluctuations that the contractor must manage.

What does the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' designation imply for the procurement process?

The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' indicates that the solicitation was made available to all responsible prospective contractors, but specific sources were intentionally excluded. This exclusion must be justified based on specific criteria outlined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), such as national security concerns, specific technological requirements, or prior performance issues. In this case, with 5 bids received, it suggests that the exclusion did not significantly limit the pool of potential offerors, maintaining a competitive environment. The 'after exclusion' part implies that the initial solicitation might have been broad, but certain entities were later deemed ineligible or were not solicited, possibly to streamline the process or focus on specific capabilities. The key takeaway is that competition was sought broadly, but with defined boundaries.

What is the track record of Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C. in fulfilling government contracts?

Assessing the track record of Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C. in fulfilling government contracts requires accessing databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or SAM.gov. A review would involve looking at past awards, contract values, performance ratings (if available), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. If the agency has a history of successfully delivering similar vehicles to government entities on time and within budget, it suggests reliability. Conversely, any past issues, such as late deliveries, quality problems, or disputes, would raise concerns. Without specific historical data on this contractor's government performance, it's difficult to definitively assess their track record. However, the fact that they were awarded this contract suggests they met the minimum qualifications and were deemed a responsible contractor at the time of award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA22R0014

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 214 W OKLAHOMA, OKARCHE, OK, 73762

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $68,578

Exercised Options: $68,578

Current Obligation: $68,578

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA23D000B

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline