GSA awards $62.6K contract for cargo vans, highlighting vehicle manufacturing sector activity

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $62,566 ($62.6K)

Contractor: Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2027-09-05

Contract Duration: 515 days

Daily Burn Rate: $121/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X2 CUTAWAY DRY CARGO VAN MIN 14,001 LBS GVWR

Place of Performance

Location: OKARCHE, CANADIAN County, OKLAHOMA, 73762

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $62,566 to CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C. for work described as: 4X2 CUTAWAY DRY CARGO VAN MIN 14,001 LBS GVWR Key points: 1. Contract awarded for specialized cargo vans, indicating demand for specific vehicle types. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a healthy market for automotive manufacturing and supply. 3. Fixed-price contract structure aims to control costs for the government. 4. Delivery order model allows for flexible procurement of needed vehicles. 5. Contract duration spans over a year, ensuring sustained supply. 6. Vehicle specifications point to a need for robust, heavy-duty transport solutions.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $62,566 for a 4x2 cutaway dry cargo van appears reasonable given the specialized nature and GVWR requirement. Benchmarking against similar government or commercial purchases of heavy-duty cargo vans would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the government has secured a defined cost for the specified vehicle.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited and evaluated. The presence of 5 bids suggests a competitive environment, which generally leads to better pricing and value for the government. This level of competition is positive for price discovery and ensures a broad range of potential suppliers were considered.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging innovation among suppliers.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring specialized cargo transport will benefit from this contract. The contract facilitates the delivery of essential goods and services across various government operations. The geographic impact is primarily tied to the delivery location of the vehicles, likely within the continental US. This contract supports the automotive manufacturing and dealership sectors, including associated supply chains.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for delivery delays if manufacturing or supply chain issues arise.
Ensuring vehicle specifications precisely match operational needs is crucial for long-term utility.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a robust market and potential for good value.
Delivery order mechanism allows for phased acquisition based on agency needs.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the broader automotive manufacturing and sales sector, specifically focusing on commercial vehicles. This segment is characterized by established manufacturers and dealerships, with government procurement representing a stable, albeit niche, market. The NAICS code 336110 (Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing) confirms its placement within this industry. Government contracts for specialized vehicles like this contribute to overall sector stability and demand.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses participated as prime contractors or subcontractors in this procurement. The absence of set-aside language suggests larger, established dealerships or manufacturers were likely the primary bidders.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) is responsible for overseeing this contract. GSA's procurement processes include established oversight mechanisms, and contracts are subject to review and audit. Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases, though specific performance monitoring details are not provided here. Inspector General oversight would apply if any fraud or mismanagement were suspected.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Procurement
Commercial Vehicle Acquisition Programs
Department of Defense Vehicle Purchases
Law Enforcement Vehicle Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for delivery delays
Specification alignment risk
Contractor performance history (requires further investigation)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $62,566 to CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C.. 4X2 CUTAWAY DRY CARGO VAN MIN 14,001 LBS GVWR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $62,566.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2027-09-05.

What is the typical lifespan and maintenance cost associated with this type of specialized cargo van when used by federal agencies?

The typical lifespan for a heavy-duty cargo van like the 4x2 cutaway specified can range from 8 to 15 years, depending heavily on usage intensity, maintenance schedules, and operating environment. Federal agencies often have rigorous maintenance programs, which can extend vehicle life. However, specialized vehicles may incur higher maintenance costs due to unique components. While specific data for this contract isn't available, industry benchmarks suggest annual maintenance costs can range from 5-10% of the initial purchase price, excluding major repairs. Factors like mileage, payload, and climate significantly influence these costs. Agencies track these metrics internally to manage fleet budgets effectively.

How does the price of $62,566 compare to similar commercial or government purchases of 4x2 cutaway dry cargo vans with a GVWR over 14,001 lbs?

Benchmarking the $62,566 price requires comparing it to vehicles with identical or very similar specifications, including the 4x2 drivetrain, cutaway chassis, dry cargo van body, and a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) exceeding 14,001 lbs. Commercially, such specialized vehicles can range significantly, often starting from $50,000 and exceeding $80,000 depending on the upfitter, chassis manufacturer (e.g., Ford, Freightliner, Isuzu), and specific cargo body features (insulation, shelving, liftgates). Government contracts, especially those awarded through full and open competition, often achieve prices at the lower end of this spectrum due to volume and streamlined processes. The presence of 5 bids suggests competitive pricing was likely achieved, making the $62,566 figure appear reasonable, assuming standard configurations and features.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Primary risks include potential delivery delays due to manufacturing backlogs or supply chain disruptions for chassis or components, and the risk that the vehicle's specifications may not perfectly align with evolving operational needs over its service life. Mitigation strategies typically involve clear contract language with defined delivery schedules and penalties for delays, as seen in the firm fixed-price structure. The General Services Administration (GSA) often employs robust contract management practices, including regular communication with the contractor and monitoring of production status. For specification alignment, agencies usually conduct thorough needs assessments prior to procurement and may incorporate options for minor modifications or ensure the chosen configuration is versatile enough for anticipated future uses.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar cargo vans by the General Services Administration?

Historical spending patterns for similar cargo vans by the GSA would reveal trends in volume, average price, and types of vehicles procured. GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) manages a vast vehicle portfolio, and data from previous years would indicate whether this $62.6K award is consistent with past procurement values for comparable heavy-duty cargo vans. Analyzing spending over the last 5-10 years could show fluctuations based on agency demand, budget appropriations, and market conditions. For instance, periods of increased infrastructure investment or fleet modernization initiatives by agencies would likely correlate with higher spending in this category. Understanding these patterns helps assess the current contract's value and GSA's ongoing commitment to fleet readiness.

How does the contractor, Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C., perform on other federal contracts?

Assessing Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C.'s track record on other federal contracts is crucial for evaluating performance risk. Information from federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) would detail their past awards, including contract types, values, agencies served, and performance ratings if available. A history of successful, on-time deliveries and adherence to contract terms suggests reliability. Conversely, a pattern of contract terminations, disputes, or poor performance ratings would raise concerns. For this specific contract, the 'OK' status in 'st' and 'sn' fields might indicate satisfactory performance on related state or local contracts, but federal performance data provides a more direct indicator of capability for GSA procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA22R0014

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 214 W OKLAHOMA, OKARCHE, OK, 73762

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $62,566

Exercised Options: $62,566

Current Obligation: $62,566

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA23D000B

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline