GSA awards $60,067 contract for 4x4 utility vehicles to Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $60,067 ($60.1K)

Contractor: Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2027-08-06

Contract Duration: 485 days

Daily Burn Rate: $124/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X4 UTILITY SERVICE, REGULAR CAB, MIN 10,001 LBS GVWR DRW

Place of Performance

Location: OKARCHE, CANADIAN County, OKLAHOMA, 73762

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $60,067 to CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C. for work described as: 4X4 UTILITY SERVICE, REGULAR CAB, MIN 10,001 LBS GVWR DRW Key points: 1. Contract awarded for specialized utility vehicles, indicating a need for robust off-road capabilities. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. Delivery order issued under a larger contract vehicle, suggesting potential for follow-on work. 4. The contract duration of approximately 485 days aligns with typical vehicle procurement cycles. 5. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, implying a broad initial search. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336110 points to motor vehicle manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $60,067 for a 4x4 utility service vehicle appears reasonable given the specifications for a regular cab with a minimum 10,001 lbs GVWR. Benchmarking against similar government vehicle procurements suggests this price is competitive. The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, although it may limit opportunities for cost savings if market prices decrease.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that while the initial pool of potential sources may have been narrowed, the final award was made through a competitive process. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method suggests that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to submit proposals, contributing to price discovery and potentially securing a better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a market-driven price for the required utility vehicles.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring durable, off-road capable utility vehicles for operational needs will benefit from this contract. The contract will deliver one or more 4x4 utility service vehicles meeting specific performance requirements. The geographic impact is likely concentrated where the vehicles are deployed, potentially across various federal installations. Workforce implications include the potential for jobs in vehicle manufacturing, assembly, and distribution related to this order.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price increases if market conditions change significantly during the contract period, though mitigated by firm-fixed-price.
Dependence on a single contractor for delivery could lead to delays if the contractor faces production or supply chain issues.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget certainty and transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor.
Award to an established dealership like Carter Chevrolet suggests a reliable source for vehicle procurement.
Delivery order mechanism allows for flexibility in acquiring specific vehicles as needed by agencies.

Sector Analysis

The automotive manufacturing sector is a significant part of the U.S. economy. This contract falls under the broader category of light-duty motor vehicle manufacturing. Government procurement of specialized vehicles like this contributes to the overall demand within this sector, supporting production and related supply chains. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar utility vehicles can vary widely based on specifications, but this award appears to be within a typical range for a single unit with specific requirements.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides is minimal. However, the prime contractor, Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C., may engage small businesses as subcontractors for parts or services, contributing indirectly to the small business ecosystem. Further analysis would be needed to determine subcontracting plans.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract, which is a delivery order issued under a larger contract vehicle. GSA's Federal Acquisition Service is responsible for managing such procurements. Oversight mechanisms likely include contract performance monitoring, financial reviews, and adherence to acquisition regulations. Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Purchasing
Department of Defense Vehicle Procurement
Law Enforcement Vehicle Acquisition
Utility Vehicle Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for delivery delays
Specification obsolescence risk
Dependence on contractor's supply chain

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $60,067 to CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C.. 4X4 UTILITY SERVICE, REGULAR CAB, MIN 10,001 LBS GVWR DRW

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $60,067.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2027-08-06.

What is the track record of Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C. in fulfilling government contracts?

Information regarding Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C.'s specific track record with government contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing historical contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any past issues or successes. Generally, agencies prefer contractors with a demonstrated history of successful delivery, adherence to schedules, and quality standards. Without specific past performance data, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability for this particular delivery order, though their selection by GSA suggests they met certain pre-qualification criteria.

How does the price of $60,067 compare to similar government vehicle procurements?

The price of $60,067 for a 4x4 utility service vehicle with a minimum 10,001 lbs GVWR appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized government vehicle acquisitions. Government vehicle prices can fluctuate significantly based on make, model, specific configurations (e.g., heavy-duty options, specialized equipment), and the competitive environment. For instance, a standard pickup truck might cost less, while a vehicle with advanced off-road capabilities or specific agency modifications could cost more. Benchmarking against recent GSA schedules or other agency awards for similar Class 2b or Class 3 trucks (based on GVWR) would provide a more precise comparison. However, given the 'full and open competition' aspect, the price suggests a competitive market outcome.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential delivery delays if Carter Chevrolet Agency, L.L.C. encounters supply chain disruptions or production issues, although the firm-fixed-price nature mitigates cost overruns. Another risk is the potential for the vehicle's specifications to become outdated if the delivery timeline is significantly extended or if technological advancements occur rapidly in the automotive sector. Furthermore, the 'after exclusion of sources' aspect of the competition, while still competitive, might imply a slightly narrower field than pure 'full and open,' potentially impacting the absolute lowest price achievable. Ensuring the vehicle meets all operational requirements upon delivery is also a key risk to manage.

How effective is the GSA's Federal Acquisition Service in managing vehicle procurements like this?

The GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) is generally considered effective in managing vehicle procurements, leveraging economies of scale and established contract vehicles to provide a wide range of vehicles to federal agencies. Their processes aim to ensure compliance, competition, and value for taxpayer money. The use of delivery orders under established IDIQs (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity) contracts, as likely used here, streamlines the acquisition process. However, effectiveness can vary, and challenges may arise in ensuring the most cutting-edge technology is consistently procured or in achieving optimal pricing for highly specialized or low-volume requirements. Continuous process improvement and market analysis are key to maintaining effectiveness.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar utility vehicles by the GSA?

Historical spending patterns for similar utility vehicles by the GSA typically show consistent demand driven by agency operational needs across various departments. GSA procures thousands of vehicles annually through various contract vehicles, including those for light-duty trucks and specialized vehicles. Spending levels can fluctuate based on overall federal budgets, agency fleet modernization initiatives, and changes in vehicle technology and pricing. The GSA often utilizes large-scale contracts that aggregate demand, leading to significant annual expenditures in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars for total vehicle procurement. Specific spending on 4x4 utility vehicles would be a subset of this larger category, influenced by factors like agency missions (e.g., park services, construction, emergency response).

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA22R0014

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 214 W OKLAHOMA, OKARCHE, OK, 73762

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $60,067

Exercised Options: $60,067

Current Obligation: $60,067

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA23D000B

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline