GSA awards $24.4M facilities support contract to Yukon Fire Protection Services for border ports

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,439,870 ($24.4M)

Contractor: Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2022-05-01

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: O&M AND VTE AT THE OTAY MESA, CALEXICO WEST&EAST, AND ANDRADE LPOE, SAN DIEGO, CA.

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92102

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $24.4 million to YUKON FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. for work described as: O&M AND VTE AT THE OTAY MESA, CALEXICO WEST&EAST, AND ANDRADE LPOE, SAN DIEGO, CA. Key points: 1. Contract provides essential operations, maintenance, and vital transportation enhancement services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs. 4. Contract duration of 1460 days (4 years) indicates a medium-term commitment. 5. Services are critical for the operational readiness of key border facilities. 6. Geographic focus on Southern California border ports highlights strategic importance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $24.4 million over four years for facilities support services at multiple border ports appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for federal installations, especially those with critical infrastructure like border crossings, suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, mitigating risks associated with fluctuating operational needs. While specific per-unit cost comparisons are not readily available without detailed service breakdowns, the overall value proposition seems sound given the scope and duration.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the method of competition suggests a robust process aimed at achieving fair market value for the government. This broad competition is a positive indicator for price discovery and efficiency.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government receives competitive offers, leading to better value for public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are federal agencies operating at the Otay Mesa, Calexico West & East, and Andrade LPOE border ports, ensuring their facilities are maintained and operational. Services include operations, maintenance, and vital transportation enhancement, crucial for border security and trade facilitation. The geographic impact is concentrated in Southern California, specifically along the U.S.-Mexico border. This contract supports the operational workforce at these ports of entry, indirectly impacting jobs related to border management and logistics.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or KPIs in the provided data makes it difficult to assess contractor performance beyond contract completion.
Potential for scope creep if 'vital transportation enhancement' is not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure support at multiple high-traffic ports could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type helps control costs and provides budget predictability.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive process that should yield favorable pricing.
Long-term contract (4 years) allows for consistent service delivery and relationship building with the contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. The market for these services is substantial, driven by government agencies, commercial enterprises, and institutions requiring specialized expertise in facility management. Comparable spending benchmarks for large federal facilities, particularly those with unique security and operational requirements like border ports, indicate that contracts of this size are common but require rigorous oversight to ensure value and performance.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc. is the prime contractor, there is no explicit information on subcontracting plans with small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore neutral unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for specialized services or supplies.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service, which is responsible for federal building management. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
Border Security Operations
Port of Entry Management
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
General Services Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues impacting critical border operations.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in public data.
Concentration of essential services at multiple high-traffic ports under one contract.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $24.4 million to YUKON FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC.. O&M AND VTE AT THE OTAY MESA, CALEXICO WEST&EAST, AND ANDRADE LPOE, SAN DIEGO, CA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YUKON FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-05-01. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the track record of Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the GSA?

Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc. has a history of federal contracting, though the extent and nature of their past performance with the GSA and other agencies would require a deeper dive into contract databases. Analyzing their past awards, contract values, and any reported performance issues or successes is crucial for assessing their capability to fulfill this current $24.4 million contract. A review of their performance ratings on previous federal contracts, if available, would provide valuable insights into their reliability, quality of service, and adherence to contract terms. Understanding their experience with similar facilities support services, especially in critical infrastructure environments like border ports, is key to evaluating their suitability.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities support services at border ports?

The awarded price of $24.4 million over four years for facilities support services at multiple border ports needs to be benchmarked against market rates for comparable services. This involves analyzing data from similar contracts awarded by other federal agencies or state/local governments for managing facilities of similar size, complexity, and criticality. Factors such as the specific services included (O&M, VTE), geographic location, and security requirements influence pricing. Without access to detailed service breakdowns and specific market data for the Southern California border region, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure and full and open competition suggest an effort to align the price with market competitiveness.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, scope creep in the 'vital transportation enhancement' services, and the concentration of critical support at multiple high-traffic ports under one contract. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by GSA, clearly defined service level agreements (SLAs), and strict change control processes. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. However, the reliance on a single contractor for essential services necessitates proactive contract management and contingency planning to address any unforeseen issues that could impact border operations.

How effective are the services delivered under this contract in supporting border operations and national security?

The effectiveness of the services is directly tied to the operational readiness and security of the border ports. Well-maintained facilities, reliable utilities (O&M), and enhanced transportation capabilities (VTE) are fundamental to efficient border processing, trade facilitation, and national security. The contract's success hinges on the contractor's ability to consistently deliver high-quality services that meet or exceed the performance standards outlined in the contract. Regular performance evaluations and feedback from the end-user agencies at the ports are crucial indicators of service effectiveness. The long-term nature of the contract aims to ensure sustained operational support.

What are the historical spending patterns for facilities support services at these specific border ports?

Historical spending data for facilities support services at the Otay Mesa, Calexico West & East, and Andrade LPOE ports would provide context for the current $24.4 million award. Analyzing past contract values, durations, and awarded contractors for similar services at these locations can reveal trends in spending, identify potential cost efficiencies or escalations over time, and highlight any shifts in service providers or contract types. Understanding this history helps assess whether the current contract represents a significant increase or decrease in spending and whether it aligns with long-term federal investment strategies for border infrastructure.

What is the potential impact of this contract on small businesses in the region?

As this contract was not set aside for small businesses and there's no explicit mention of subcontracting goals, the direct impact on the regional small business ecosystem may be limited. However, the prime contractor, Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc., may choose to engage local small businesses for specific services, materials, or support functions. The extent of this subcontracting would determine the indirect economic benefit to small businesses. A proactive approach by the prime contractor to include small businesses in their supply chain could foster local economic development and create opportunities within the facilities support sector.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: K'oyitl'ots'ina, Limited

Address: 5451 LAONA DR, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99518

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,439,870

Exercised Options: $24,439,870

Current Obligation: $24,439,870

Actual Outlays: $611,827

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PK0221A0004

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline