GSA awards $5.6M facilities support contract to Yukon Fire Protection Services for Connecticut buildings

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,633,888 ($5.6M)

Contractor: Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-11-01

End Date: 2026-10-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 47PF5225F0003 - CT COMBINED SERVICES -OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, AND CUSTODIAL AND RELATED SERVICES FOR MULTIPLE BUILDINGS IN HARTFORD, NEW HAVEN, BRIDGEPORT, AND TORRINGTON, CONNECTICUT. THIS AWARD EXERCISES OPTION YEAR 3 OF THE BPA.

Place of Performance

Location: HARTFORD, HARTFORD County, CONNECTICUT, 06103

State: Connecticut Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $5.6 million to YUKON FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 47PF5225F0003 - CT COMBINED SERVICES -OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, AND CUSTODIAL AND RELATED SERVICES FOR MULTIPLE BUILDINGS IN HARTFORD, NEW HAVEN, BRIDGEPORT, AND TORRINGTON, CONNECTICUT. THIS AWARD EXERCISES OPTION YEAR 3 OF THE BPA. Key points: 1. Contract value represents option year 3, indicating ongoing need for services. 2. Services include operations, maintenance, and custodial support across multiple Connecticut locations. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. Contract duration extends through October 2026, providing stable service delivery. 6. Geographic scope covers four major Connecticut cities, impacting public facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $5.6 million over one year for facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope of work covering multiple buildings across four cities in Connecticut. Benchmarking against similar GSA contracts for facilities maintenance and custodial services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure offers cost predictability, which is a positive indicator for efficient spending. However, without detailed breakdowns of labor hours, material costs, and specific service levels, a definitive value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a robust competitive environment. Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and encourages contractors to offer competitive pricing and innovative solutions to win the award.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and higher quality services due to the pressure on bidders to be the most cost-effective and capable.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors using government buildings in Hartford, New Haven, Bridgeport, and Torrington will benefit from maintained facilities. Essential services including building operations, maintenance, and custodial care are delivered. The geographic impact is concentrated within Connecticut, supporting federal operations in the state. Local workforces may be engaged for service delivery, contributing to regional employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of competitive intensity.
Detailed performance metrics and historical quality data are not readily available.
Potential for scope creep or unexercised options in future years if not managed closely.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
Option year 3 exercise indicates satisfaction with contractor performance.
Long-term contract duration ensures continuity of essential services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings. This sector is critical for government operations, ensuring that federal facilities are safe, functional, and presentable. Spending in this area is consistent across many federal agencies, with GSA being a primary procurer for civilian agencies. Market size for facilities management services is substantial, with numerous providers ranging from small businesses to large corporations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. While the prime contractor, Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc., is not explicitly identified as a small business in this data, the contract was awarded under full and open competition. This means small businesses could have bid directly if they met the qualifications. There is no information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could be a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. GSA typically has established procedures for contract monitoring, performance reviews, and dispute resolution. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Accountability measures would include performance standards outlined in the contract and potential remedies for non-performance. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance and Operations
Custodial Services
Building Operations Support
Government Building Management
GSA Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics
Limited information on number of bidders
Unknown track record of contractor on federal contracts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $5.6 million to YUKON FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC.. 47PF5225F0003 - CT COMBINED SERVICES -OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, AND CUSTODIAL AND RELATED SERVICES FOR MULTIPLE BUILDINGS IN HARTFORD, NEW HAVEN, BRIDGEPORT, AND TORRINGTON, CONNECTICUT. THIS AWARD EXERCISES OPTION YEAR 3 OF THE BPA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YUKON FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-01. End: 2026-10-31.

What is the historical spending trend for this specific contract vehicle or similar services procured by GSA in Connecticut?

Analyzing historical spending for this BPA call and similar facilities support contracts by GSA in Connecticut would reveal spending patterns over time. For instance, if this $5.6 million award represents a consistent or increasing expenditure compared to previous option years or prior contracts, it suggests a stable or growing demand for these services. Conversely, a decrease might indicate efficiency gains or a reduction in facility needs. Understanding these trends helps contextualize the current award amount and assess whether spending is escalating unnecessarily or remaining within expected parameters. Without access to historical award data for this specific BPA call or comparable contracts in the region, it's difficult to establish a precise trend, but the exercise of option year 3 suggests sustained utilization and funding.

How does the per-unit cost of services (e.g., per square foot, per building) compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities in the Northeast region?

To assess the value for money, a comparison of per-unit costs against industry benchmarks is crucial. For example, if the contract covers 1 million square feet, the cost per square foot can be calculated and compared to average rates for janitorial, maintenance, and operations services in the Northeast. Factors like building age, type (office, specialized facility), and specific service intensity (e.g., frequency of cleaning, complexity of HVAC systems) influence these benchmarks. If the contract's per-unit cost is significantly higher than the regional average, it could indicate potential overpricing or a higher level of service. Conversely, a lower cost might suggest favorable pricing or potential risks to service quality if not carefully monitored. Without detailed service scope and square footage data, a precise per-unit cost benchmark is not feasible from the provided information.

What is the track record of Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc. on federal contracts, particularly regarding performance and past disputes?

Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc.'s track record on federal contracts is a key indicator of reliability and performance. Information from sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would detail past performance evaluations, including timeliness, quality of work, and cost control. Any history of contract disputes, claims, or terminations would raise red flags regarding potential risks. A history of positive performance reviews and successful contract completions suggests a lower risk profile for this current award. Conversely, a pattern of negative feedback or unresolved issues would warrant closer scrutiny of contract management and oversight. The exercise of option year 3 implies a degree of satisfaction, but a comprehensive review of their federal contracting history is necessary for a complete assessment.

What are the specific performance metrics and service level agreements (SLAs) included in this contract, and how are they monitored?

The effectiveness and value of this contract hinge on clearly defined performance metrics and SLAs. These should specify expected standards for maintenance response times, cleaning frequencies, building system uptime, and overall facility condition. Robust monitoring mechanisms, such as regular inspections, user feedback surveys, and contractor self-reporting, are essential to ensure compliance. The GSA's Public Buildings Service likely has established protocols for performance monitoring. Without access to the contract's detailed SOW and SLAs, it's impossible to evaluate the adequacy of these measures or the rigor of their enforcement, which directly impacts the realization of value and service quality for taxpayers.

How does the total contract value compare to the initial estimated cost or ceiling value, if applicable?

Comparing the awarded contract value to its initial estimated cost or ceiling provides insight into cost control and potential overruns. If the $5.6 million award is close to or at the ceiling, it suggests the government fully utilized the allocated funds. If it's significantly below, it might indicate efficient procurement or a reduced scope. For BPA calls, the ceiling is often established at the BPA level, and individual calls draw from it. Understanding the relationship between awarded value and the initial estimate helps determine if the contract was procured efficiently and if spending aligns with expectations. This context is crucial for assessing fiscal responsibility and identifying potential areas for cost savings in future procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PB0022Q0019

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: K'oyitl'ots'ina, Limited

Address: 5451 LAONA DR, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99518

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $37,885,250

Exercised Options: $5,633,888

Current Obligation: $5,633,888

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PB0022A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline