GSA awards $342K for facilities modernization, including lighting and insulation upgrades

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $342,429 ($342.4K)

Contractor: Action Facilities Management Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-08-07

Contract Duration: 122 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO MODERNIZE LOBBY LIGHTING, RETROFIT ROOM 411 TO FIRE RATING STANDARDS, AND INSULATE PIPING FOR THE COOLING TOWER.

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10017

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $342,428.96 to ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO MODERNIZE LOBBY LIGHTING, RETROFIT ROOM 411 TO FIRE RATING STANDARDS, AND INSULATE PIPING FOR THE COOLING TOWER. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential building maintenance and safety improvements. 2. Fixed-price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government. 3. Limited duration indicates a project-based scope rather than ongoing services. 4. The contract is a call against a larger Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), suggesting pre-negotiated terms. 5. Geographic focus on New York may indicate localized needs or service areas.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $342,428.96 for facilities modernization appears reasonable for the described scope, which includes lighting, fire rating retrofitting, and insulation. Without specific benchmarks for these exact services in the New York region, a direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult. However, the fixed-price nature of the award provides a degree of cost control. The General Services Administration (GSA) typically manages a large portfolio of buildings, and such modernization efforts are standard for maintaining asset value and operational efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a competitive process was utilized. Full and open competition is generally expected to yield the best value and pricing for the government by allowing a wide range of contractors to participate.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors will benefit from improved lobby lighting and enhanced fire safety in Room 411. The modernization efforts contribute to the operational efficiency and safety of a federal facility managed by GSA. The project's geographic impact is localized to the facility in New York. The contract supports the facilities management sector workforce, likely involving skilled trades.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of competitive intensity.
Details on the specific materials and labor hours are not publicly available, hindering granular cost analysis.
The scope is limited to specific building components, not a comprehensive facility overhaul.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability.
The contract addresses essential safety and maintenance requirements.
The project is part of a larger BPA, implying established procurement channels and potentially pre-vetted contractors.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a broad range of services related to the operation, maintenance, and repair of buildings and other physical structures. The market for these services is substantial, driven by the ongoing need for upkeep and modernization of commercial and government properties. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other GSA contracts for similar building retrofits and maintenance projects within the New York region.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside requirement for this particular award (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor, ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC, may be a small business itself, the award does not appear to have been specifically targeted towards small businesses through set-aside provisions. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly detailed in the provided data, but are a possibility depending on the prime contractor's strategy and the nature of the work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. As a call against a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), the underlying BPA likely has established oversight mechanisms. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by defining the scope and cost upfront. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed project-specific reporting may vary.

Related Government Programs

GSA Public Buildings Service Operations
Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Facilities Modernization Projects
Energy Efficiency Retrofits

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting schedule and cost.
Risk of contractor performance not meeting quality standards.
Dependency on material availability and skilled labor.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $342,428.96 to ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO MODERNIZE LOBBY LIGHTING, RETROFIT ROOM 411 TO FIRE RATING STANDARDS, AND INSULATE PIPING FOR THE COOLING TOWER.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $342,428.96.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-08-07.

What is the track record of ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC with the federal government, particularly with GSA?

A comprehensive review of ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC's federal contracting history would require accessing databases like SAM.gov or FPDS. Based on the provided data, this appears to be a direct award from GSA. To assess their track record, one would look for past performance on similar contracts, including project scope, value, timeliness of completion, and any reported issues or disputes. Understanding their experience with GSA's specific requirements and procedures, especially within the Public Buildings Service, would be crucial. A history of successful, on-time, and within-budget project completions would indicate a positive track record, while frequent delays, cost overruns, or performance deficiencies would raise concerns.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar facilities modernization projects managed by GSA?

Benchmarking the pricing of this $342,428.96 contract requires comparing it against similar projects undertaken by GSA or other federal agencies in the New York region. Key comparison points would include the scope of work (e.g., square footage affected by lighting upgrades, complexity of fire rating retrofits, linear feet of piping insulated), the duration of the contract, and the specific labor and material costs involved. Without access to a detailed cost breakdown or a database of comparable GSA projects with similar scopes, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the fixed-price nature suggests that the contractor has estimated these costs and GSA has agreed to them, implying a level of negotiation and perceived fairness in the pricing at the time of award.

What are the primary risks associated with this facilities modernization contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential scope creep, where the requirements might expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost increases or delays, although the fixed-price nature aims to mitigate this. There's also a risk of unforeseen site conditions during the retrofitting and insulation work, which could necessitate additional resources or time. Contractor performance risk exists, meaning ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC might not deliver the work to the required standards or within the specified timeframe. Furthermore, material availability or labor shortages could impact project timelines. Given the relatively modest contract value and duration, these risks are likely manageable, but require diligent oversight from GSA.

How effective are GSA's oversight mechanisms for contracts awarded under BPAs like this one?

GSA's oversight for contracts awarded under BPAs typically leverages the established framework of the BPA itself, which often includes pre-negotiated terms, performance standards, and reporting requirements. For this specific contract, GSA's Public Buildings Service would be responsible for monitoring progress, ensuring compliance with the contract terms, and verifying the quality of work. Oversight mechanisms would likely involve regular site inspections, review of progress reports, and communication with the contractor. The effectiveness hinges on the diligence of the contracting officer's representative (COR) and the clarity of the performance metrics defined within the BPA and the individual call-off. The fixed-price nature simplifies financial oversight but places greater emphasis on performance and scope adherence.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by GSA in New York?

Analyzing GSA's historical spending patterns for facilities support services in New York would involve examining aggregate data over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured (e.g., maintenance, repair, modernization, cleaning), and the distribution of funds across different contractors and contract vehicles (like BPAs). Understanding this pattern helps contextualize the current $342K award, indicating whether it represents a typical investment or a deviation. For instance, a consistent pattern of similar-sized modernization projects would suggest this award aligns with established GSA practices in the region. Conversely, a significant increase or decrease in spending could signal shifts in GSA's priorities or budget allocations for facility management in New York.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMAG-26-0217

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 115 MALONE DR, MORGANTOWN, WV, 26501

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $342,429

Exercised Options: $342,429

Current Obligation: $342,429

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PC0623A0002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline