GSA awards $13.2M contract for generator maintenance, highlighting facilities support services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,204 ($13.2K)

Contractor: Action Facilities Management Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2027-01-08

Contract Duration: 274 days

Daily Burn Rate: $48/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FILL PORT REPLACEMENT FOR EMERGENCY GENERATOR

Place of Performance

Location: BOSTON, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02222

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $13,203.6 to ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC for work described as: FILL PORT REPLACEMENT FOR EMERGENCY GENERATOR Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential facility maintenance, ensuring operational continuity for critical infrastructure. 2. The award was made under a broad acquisition vehicle, suggesting potential for streamlined procurement. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 4. The duration of the contract extends over a significant period, indicating a need for ongoing support. 5. Geographic focus on Massachusetts suggests localized service delivery. 6. The contractor has experience in facilities support services, aligning with the contract's requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.2 million for a 274-day period appears reasonable for comprehensive generator maintenance and related facilities support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for emergency generator upkeep and facility management services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is advantageous for cost control. Without specific details on the scope of work and service levels, a definitive comparison is challenging, but the award seems aligned with typical expenditures for such essential services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is expected to drive fair pricing and ensure the government selects the most capable and cost-effective solution. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and higher quality services, maximizing the value of federal spending.

Public Impact

Federal facilities in Massachusetts will benefit from reliable emergency power systems. Services include maintenance and repair for emergency generators, ensuring operational readiness. The contract supports the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service mission. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for skilled technicians in the Massachusetts area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if maintenance requirements are not clearly defined.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract helps manage cost overruns.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for these services.
Contract duration indicates a long-term need, potentially leading to stable service provision.
Contractor's specialization in facilities support aligns with the service requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of government operations. This sector encompasses a wide range of services necessary to maintain government buildings and infrastructure, including maintenance, repair, and operational support. The market for these services is substantial, with numerous providers ranging from small businesses to large corporations. The award to ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC under a GSA schedule highlights the government's reliance on established procurement vehicles for efficient acquisition of these essential services.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates no explicit subcontracting requirements for small businesses were mandated. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity or that subcontracting opportunities were not a primary focus of this particular award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the prime contractor has a history of engaging small businesses in their supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is subject to oversight by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. As a firm-fixed-price contract awarded through full and open competition, it implies adherence to standard procurement regulations. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Inspector General oversight would apply if any performance or financial irregularities were identified.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Emergency Generator Services
Public Buildings Service Contracts
General Services Administration Schedules

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues impacting critical infrastructure.
Risk of unforeseen repair costs exceeding fixed-price limits if scope is not well-defined.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $13,203.6 to ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC. FILL PORT REPLACEMENT FOR EMERGENCY GENERATOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13,203.6.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2027-01-08.

What is the historical spending pattern for emergency generator maintenance and facilities support services by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently allocates significant funds towards facilities maintenance and operational support, including emergency generator services. Historical data indicates a steady demand for these services across various federal buildings nationwide. Spending in this category is driven by the need to ensure the continuous operation of critical government infrastructure, especially in the face of power outages or emergencies. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on agency needs, contract renewals, and new procurements, the GSA's budget reflects a sustained commitment to maintaining its real estate portfolio. Analyzing past contract awards for similar services can reveal trends in pricing, contractor performance, and the types of services most frequently procured, providing a benchmark for current and future spending.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar generator maintenance services?

Determining the precise market rate comparison for this $13.2 million contract requires detailed knowledge of the specific services rendered, the geographic location, and the exact scope of work. However, the firm-fixed-price structure awarded under full and open competition suggests that the price was vetted against market competition. Generally, GSA schedules aim to provide pre-negotiated, competitive pricing. To conduct a thorough comparison, one would need to benchmark against similar contracts awarded by other federal agencies or state/local governments in Massachusetts, considering factors like generator size, maintenance frequency, response times, and included services (e.g., testing, fuel management, repairs). Without this granular data, the $13.2 million figure represents the government's negotiated price, presumed to be competitive due to the procurement method.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being monitored?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) for a contract of this nature typically revolve around the reliability and responsiveness of the emergency generator systems. These would likely include metrics such as generator uptime percentage, response time to service calls, successful completion of scheduled maintenance and testing, and adherence to safety protocols. Performance monitoring is usually conducted by the contracting officer's representative (COR) or a designated government technical point of contact. They would review service reports, conduct site inspections, and track the contractor's performance against the contract's statement of work and any established KPIs. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract incentivizes the contractor to meet these performance standards efficiently to ensure profitability.

What is the track record of ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC in performing similar federal contracts?

ACTION FACILITIES MANAGEMENT INC has a history of performing federal contracts, particularly within the facilities management and support services domain. Information available through federal procurement databases often details past performance, including contract values, agencies served, and contract types. A review of their contract history would reveal their experience with similar services, such as maintenance of critical infrastructure like generators. Assessing their past performance ratings, any past performance issues or awards, and the scale of previous contracts would provide insight into their capability to successfully execute this current $13.2 million award. Their presence on GSA schedules also indicates a level of vetting and established capability.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Potential risks for this contract include service disruptions due to contractor underperformance, unforeseen equipment failures requiring extensive repairs beyond routine maintenance, or cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately cover all eventualities. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by the GSA, clear performance standards in the contract's statement of work, and contingency planning. The firm-fixed-price structure itself acts as a risk mitigation tool for the government by capping costs. Furthermore, the full and open competition process aims to select a contractor with a proven track record, reducing the risk of poor performance. The contract duration allows for relationship building but also necessitates ongoing monitoring.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMAC-26-0047

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 115 MALONE DR, MORGANTOWN, WV, 26501

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,204

Exercised Options: $13,204

Current Obligation: $13,204

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PB0023A0006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline