DOJ's $65.7M medical services contract awarded to Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC for January 2026

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $65,700 ($65.7K)

Contractor: Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-01-01

End Date: 2026-01-31

Contract Duration: 30 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.2K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: LAT - COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL - IMS JANUARY FY26

Place of Performance

Location: ANTHONY, EL PASO County, TEXAS, 79821

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $65,700 to INTEGRATED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: LAT - COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL - IMS JANUARY FY26 Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the short duration and fixed-price nature. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially competitive award, though details are limited. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the short-term, fixed-price contract. 4. Performance context is a single month of comprehensive medical services. 5. Sector positioning is within the healthcare services for federal correctional facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $65.7 million for a single month of service is substantial. Benchmarking against similar, longer-term comprehensive medical service contracts for federal facilities is difficult due to the short duration. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost expectation. The per-unit cost, if calculable, would need to be compared against the patient population and service intensity to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting it was likely a full and open competition among eligible vendors. With 3 bidders, the competition level appears adequate for this type of procurement, potentially leading to reasonable price discovery. However, the specific details of the bidding process and the number of proposals received are not fully detailed.

Taxpayer Impact: The competition, while adequate, may not have driven the absolute lowest price possible compared to a larger, more extensively competed contract. Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that likely prevented excessive pricing for the short-term service.

Public Impact

Inmates within the Federal Prison System in Texas will receive comprehensive medical services. The contract ensures continuity of care for a critical population. Geographic impact is localized to federal correctional facilities in Texas. Workforce implications include employment for medical professionals and support staff managed by Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service disruption if contractor performance is subpar during the short period.
Limited opportunity to assess long-term contractor performance and value.
Dependence on a single contractor for essential medical services during the contract period.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Award to a single entity simplifies management and oversight for the short duration.
Competition, even under SAP, suggests a baseline level of market validation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Healthcare sector, specifically General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (NAICS 622110). The federal government is a significant purchaser of healthcare services, particularly for correctional facilities, veterans' affairs, and military personnel. Spending in this sub-sector often involves complex service delivery models and regulatory compliance. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at per diem rates for inmate care or comprehensive service contracts for similar populations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SB: false). There is no information on subcontracting plans. The award to Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC, without specific size designation, suggests it may not be a small business, or if it is, it was competed under general procedures. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless subcontracting opportunities are significant and directed towards them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Bureau of Prisons contracting officers and facility staff. Accountability measures are tied to the firm fixed-price contract terms and performance expectations. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award notice, but detailed performance metrics and financial breakdowns are not publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Medical Services
Bureau of Prisons Healthcare Contracts
Department of Justice Medical Support
Inmate Healthcare Services

Risk Flags

High cost for short duration
Limited performance history context
Potential for emergency or transitional need driving cost

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $65,700 to INTEGRATED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC. LAT - COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL - IMS JANUARY FY26

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEGRATED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $65,700.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-01. End: 2026-01-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for comprehensive medical services at this specific federal facility or within the Texas region of the Bureau of Prisons?

Analyzing historical spending for comprehensive medical services at this specific federal facility or within the Texas region of the Bureau of Prisons is crucial for context. Without access to historical contract data, it's difficult to determine if the $65.7 million for a 30-day period represents an increase, decrease, or stable expenditure compared to previous periods. Factors such as inflation, changes in inmate population health needs, and evolving healthcare standards can influence year-over-year costs. Understanding past contract values, durations, and awarded vendors would allow for a more robust assessment of whether this current award represents a fair market price and efficient use of taxpayer funds. For instance, if previous contracts for similar services were significantly lower or covered longer periods for a comparable population, it might raise questions about the current contract's value.

How does the per-patient cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for correctional healthcare?

Determining the per-patient cost requires knowing the average daily inmate population served during the contract period. If, for example, the facility houses 1,000 inmates, the daily cost would be approximately $65.7 million / 30 days / 1,000 inmates = $2,190 per inmate per day. This figure would then need to be benchmarked against industry standards for correctional healthcare, which can vary widely based on the acuity of the patient population and the scope of services provided. National averages for correctional healthcare can range from $100 to over $400 per inmate per day, encompassing medical, dental, and mental health services. A cost of $2,190 per day would be exceptionally high and warrant significant scrutiny, suggesting either a misunderstanding of the contract's scope (e.g., it includes specialized high-cost care or capital expenditures not typical for a monthly service contract) or a severe overpricing issue. Further clarification on the patient census and the exact services included is essential for a meaningful comparison.

What is Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC's track record with federal correctional facility contracts, specifically regarding performance and cost control?

Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC's track record with federal correctional facility contracts is a key indicator of their capability and reliability. Information regarding past performance, including adherence to schedules, quality of services delivered, patient outcomes, and any history of contract disputes or penalties, would be vital. Specifically, examining their history with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or other federal agencies in similar roles can reveal patterns in cost management and operational efficiency. If they have a history of successful, cost-effective service delivery in comparable environments, it lends confidence to this award. Conversely, a record of performance issues, cost overruns, or significant contract modifications could signal potential risks for this new contract, even with its short duration. A review of past performance evaluations and any publicly available data on their federal contract history would provide necessary context.

What specific medical services are included under this 'comprehensive medical' contract, and are there any specialized or high-cost services anticipated?

The term 'comprehensive medical' can encompass a wide range of services, and understanding the specifics is critical for evaluating the contract's value and appropriateness. This includes knowing if the scope covers routine primary care, emergency services, specialized medical treatments (e.g., dialysis, oncology, mental health), pharmaceuticals, diagnostic imaging, and dental care. If the contract includes provisions for high-cost, specialized treatments or anticipates a significant number of inmates requiring such care during January 2026, the $65.7 million figure might be more justifiable. However, if it primarily covers standard medical care for a typical inmate population, the cost could be disproportionately high. A detailed breakdown of the service catalog and any anticipated patient needs would be necessary to assess if the allocated funds align with the expected service delivery and patient acuity.

Given the short, one-month duration, what is the rationale for awarding such a substantial amount, and could this indicate a need for emergency services or a transition period?

The substantial award of $65.7 million for a single month of comprehensive medical services strongly suggests a specific, potentially urgent, or transitional need rather than routine, ongoing care. Possible rationales include covering a critical period where existing services are unavailable, facilitating a transition between contractors, or addressing an anticipated surge in demand due to unforeseen circumstances or specific events within the facility during January 2026. It could also represent a placeholder or emergency procurement to ensure continuity of care while a longer-term, more competitively bid contract is finalized. Without further context on the specific circumstances prompting this short-term, high-value award, it is difficult to definitively assess its efficiency. However, such a structure often implies a reactive procurement rather than proactive, long-term strategic planning.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › General Medical and Surgical Hospitals › General Medical and Surgical Hospitals

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › GENERAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1485 HERITAGE PKWY, MANSFIELD, TX, 76063

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $90,700

Exercised Options: $90,700

Current Obligation: $65,700

Actual Outlays: $39,217

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline