DOJ's $154K contract for medical services in West Virginia awarded to Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $153,744 ($153.7K)

Contractor: Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-12-01

End Date: 2026-04-06

Contract Duration: 126 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: COMPREHENSIVE OUTSIDE MEDICAL SERVICES DECEMBER FY26

Place of Performance

Location: RONCEVERTE, GREENBRIER County, WEST VIRGINIA, 24970

State: West Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $153,744.01 to INTEGRATED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: COMPREHENSIVE OUTSIDE MEDICAL SERVICES DECEMBER FY26 Key points: 1. The contract value represents a modest investment for specialized medical services within a federal facility. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are noted as 'Full and Open', suggesting a broad market solicitation. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 4. Performance is tied to a specific delivery order with a defined period of performance. 5. The contract falls within the healthcare sector, specifically general medical and surgical hospitals. 6. The award is a delivery order, indicating it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar framework.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $154,000 for a 126-day period of service appears reasonable for specialized medical support within a federal correctional facility. Benchmarking against similar contracts for outside medical services in federal prisons is challenging without more specific service details and geographic comparisons. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if the price is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition', indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests a good opportunity for price discovery and selection of the most advantageous offer for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of securing services at a competitive market rate, preventing potential overpayment and ensuring efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

Inmates within the Federal Prison System in West Virginia will benefit from comprehensive outside medical services. The services delivered are crucial for maintaining the health and well-being of the incarcerated population. The geographic impact is localized to West Virginia, serving a specific federal correctional facility. This contract supports the operational needs of the Bureau of Prisons by ensuring access to necessary medical care.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Healthcare sector, specifically the sub-sector of General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (NAICS 622110). The market for providing medical services to federal correctional facilities is specialized, often requiring contractors with specific security clearances and experience in correctional healthcare. While the overall market for hospital services is substantial, contracts for federal prisons represent a niche segment. Benchmarking this specific contract's value against broader healthcare spending would be misleading due to its specialized nature and captive patient population.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The focus of this award was on securing the required medical services through the most competitive means available.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) contracting officers and program managers. They are responsible for monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and managing payments. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction for this particular delivery order isn't detailed, the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General generally oversees federal prison system operations for fraud, waste, and abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

healthcare, department-of-justice, bureau-of-prisons, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, medical-services, west-virginia, correctional-facility, general-medical-and-surgical-hospitals

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $153,744.01 to INTEGRATED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC. COMPREHENSIVE OUTSIDE MEDICAL SERVICES DECEMBER FY26

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEGRATED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $153,744.01.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-01. End: 2026-04-06.

What is the track record of Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC with federal contracts, particularly within the Bureau of Prisons?

To assess the track record of Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC, a review of their past federal contract awards would be necessary. This would involve examining contract databases to identify previous awards, their values, performance history, and any reported issues or successes. Specifically, looking for prior contracts with the Bureau of Prisons or other correctional facilities would provide insight into their experience with this unique operating environment. A history of successful, on-time, and within-budget performance on similar contracts would indicate a lower risk profile. Conversely, a history of contract disputes, performance failures, or significant cost overruns could signal potential risks for this current award. Without specific historical data on Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC's performance, it is difficult to definitively assess their track record.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar medical service contracts awarded by the Bureau of Prisons in other states?

Comparing the pricing of this $153,744.01 contract for approximately four months of service requires access to detailed data on comparable contracts. Key factors influencing price include the scope of services (e.g., physician hours, specialist consultations, emergency care, diagnostic services), the patient population size and acuity, and the geographic location's cost of living and labor market. Contracts in high-cost-of-living areas or those requiring highly specialized or 24/7 services would naturally command higher prices. To perform a robust comparison, one would need to normalize contract values by factors such as cost per inmate per day, cost per service provided, or average hourly rates for specific medical personnel. Without such granular data and a clear understanding of the service scope, a direct price comparison is speculative. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests the government sought a predictable cost.

What are the primary risks associated with contracting for outside medical services for federal inmates?

Several risks are associated with contracting for outside medical services for federal inmates. Firstly, there's a risk of inadequate service provision if the contractor fails to meet the required standards of care, potentially impacting inmate health and leading to legal challenges for the government. Secondly, cost escalation can occur if the contract terms are not precise, leading to change orders or disputes over scope, although the firm fixed-price nature of this award mitigates some of that risk. Thirdly, continuity of care can be disrupted if the contractor experiences staffing shortages or operational issues. Fourthly, security risks exist when inmates are moved outside the facility for care, requiring escorts and potentially creating escape or assault opportunities. Finally, ensuring the contractor's compliance with federal regulations, HIPAA, and specific BOP requirements adds an oversight burden.

What is the historical spending trend for outside medical services by the Federal Prison System?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for outside medical services by the Federal Prison System (FPS) would reveal the overall investment in supplementing in-house healthcare capabilities. This would involve examining aggregate spending data over several fiscal years. Trends might indicate an increase or decrease in reliance on external providers, potentially driven by factors such as changes in inmate health profiles, fluctuations in the availability of in-house medical staff, or shifts in healthcare policy. Understanding these trends can help contextualize the current contract award, indicating whether it represents a typical expenditure or a deviation from historical patterns. A consistent or growing expenditure might suggest a persistent need for external medical support, while a declining trend could imply improved internal capabilities or reduced demand.

How does the 'Full and Open Competition' method impact the potential for cost savings for the government in this contract?

The 'Full and Open Competition' method is designed to maximize cost savings for the government by encouraging a wide range of potential bidders to submit proposals. By allowing any responsible source to compete, the government increases the likelihood of receiving multiple offers, which naturally drives down prices as contractors vie for the award. This broad competition helps ensure that the selected offer represents the best value, considering both price and technical merit. In contrast, limited or sole-source procurements often result in higher prices due to reduced competitive pressure. Therefore, the 'Full and Open Competition' approach used for this contract is a positive indicator for potential taxpayer savings, as it leverages market forces to achieve a competitive price for the required medical services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social AssistanceGeneral Medical and Surgical HospitalsGeneral Medical and Surgical Hospitals

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICESOTHER MEDICAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1485 HERITAGE PKWY, MANSFIELD, TX, 76063

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $153,744

Exercised Options: $153,744

Current Obligation: $153,744

Actual Outlays: $62,873

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15B10121D00000103

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-12-01

Current End Date: 2026-04-06

Potential End Date: 2026-04-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-06

More Contracts from Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC

View all Integrated Medical Solutions, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending