DoD Awards $26.75M for Industrial Building Construction, Firm Fixed Price Contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,754,241 ($26.8M)
Contractor: David Boland Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-09-26
End Date: 2011-05-09
Contract Duration: 2,051 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Place of Performance
Location: NELLIS AFB, CLARK County, NEVADA, 89191
State: Nevada Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.8 million to DAVID BOLAND INC for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $26.75 million awarded. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open', indicating broad market access. 3. Contract duration is substantial at 2051 days. 4. Sector is Industrial Building Construction, a key area for infrastructure.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $26.75 million for industrial building construction appears reasonable given the contract duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects would provide a clearer picture of its value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method allows all qualified contractors to bid, potentially leading to competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through market forces.
Public Impact
Impacts military readiness and operational capabilities through infrastructure development. Supports the construction industry and associated supply chains. Potential for job creation in the region where construction takes place.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration could lead to cost overruns or scope creep.
- Firm Fixed Price contract may not account for unforeseen material cost increases.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition promotes market efficiency.
- Clear contract type (Firm Fixed Price) provides cost certainty.
- Awarded by Department of the Army, indicating a critical need.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically industrial building construction, which is essential for maintaining and expanding government facilities. Spending in this area is often driven by modernization and operational requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved in this contract (sb: false). Opportunities for small business subcontracting were not explicitly detailed, which could be a missed avenue for economic inclusion.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration necessitates continuous monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Industrial Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (2051 days).
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- No explicit small business participation.
- Potential for cost overruns due to fixed price and long term.
- Limited information on specific facility types and strategic alignment.
Tags
industrial-building-construction, department-of-defense, nv, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.8 million to DAVID BOLAND INC. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DAVID BOLAND INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-09-26. End: 2011-05-09.
What specific industrial facilities were constructed or improved under this contract, and how do they align with current military strategic needs?
The contract was for industrial building construction, likely encompassing facilities such as workshops, storage depots, or maintenance hangars. The alignment with current military needs would depend on the specific Army installations and their operational requirements at the time of award and throughout the contract's lifespan. Without further details on the facility types, a precise strategic alignment assessment is difficult.
Given the firm fixed price and long duration, what mechanisms were in place to mitigate risks associated with potential material cost fluctuations or unforeseen construction challenges?
While a firm fixed price contract offers cost certainty, it inherently shifts risk to the contractor for cost overruns. Mitigation for material fluctuations might have been addressed through detailed contract clauses, escalation provisions, or the contractor's own risk management strategies. Unforeseen challenges could be managed via change order processes, though these can impact the fixed price if not carefully controlled.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best value was achieved compared to other potential contracting strategies for this type of project?
Full and open competition generally maximizes the pool of potential bidders, fostering a competitive environment that is conducive to achieving best value. The success of this strategy depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the responsiveness of the market, and the evaluation criteria used. Without comparative data from other strategies, it's presumed this method yielded competitive pricing and qualified bidders for the Army's needs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 509 S PALM AVE, TITUSVILLE, FL, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-09-26
Current End Date: 2011-05-09
Potential End Date: 2011-05-09 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-08-30
More Contracts from David Boland Inc
- CAB Infrastructure - FY12 MCA PN 69489 Combat Aviation Brigade (CAB) Infrustructure, Phase 1, Wheeler Army Airfield, Oahu, HI — $68.0M (Department of Defense)
- Military - Construct the 4TH ID CAB Assault Battalion Maintenance Hangar, Fort Carson, CO — $55.4M (Department of Defense)
- Construct a 10MW Generation Plant, With Microgrid Controls — $54.3M (Department of Defense)
- Install Microgrid AT Fort Liberty, NC — $42.6M (Department of Defense)
- Design BID Build for Construction of Army Reserve Center, Vehicle Maintenance Shop, and Organizational (unheated) Storage Building in Asheville, NC — $32.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)