Department of the Army awards $29.3M industrial building construction contract to DAVID BOLAND INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,348,809 ($29.3M)

Contractor: David Boland Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-07-16

End Date: 2012-02-24

Contract Duration: 1,318 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BASE BID AND OPTION ONE

Place of Performance

Location: KNOB NOSTER, JOHNSON County, MISSOURI, 65336

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.3 million to DAVID BOLAND INC for work described as: BASE BID AND OPTION ONE Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1318 days indicates a significant, long-term project. 3. The base bid and option one total of $29.3M represents substantial federal investment. 4. The contract is for industrial building construction, a key area for infrastructure development. 5. The award to DAVID BOLAND INC. suggests a track record in handling large-scale construction projects. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major federal agency.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $29.3 million contract for industrial building construction is challenging without specific project details or comparable contract data. However, the duration of over three years suggests a substantial undertaking. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if the initial pricing was competitive. Further analysis would require comparing the per-square-foot cost or cost per unit of construction against similar projects awarded by the Department of the Army or other federal agencies.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition' solicitation, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 6 bidders (no) indicates a healthy level of competition for this project. A competitive bidding process generally leads to better price discovery and can result in more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently by driving down costs through multiple bids. This approach maximizes the opportunity to secure the best value for the government.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army, which will receive the constructed industrial facilities. The services delivered include the construction of industrial buildings, crucial for military operations and logistics. The geographic impact is focused on Missouri (sn: MISSOURI), where the construction will take place. The project will likely create or sustain jobs in the construction sector within Missouri.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific project scope makes it difficult to assess if the $29.3M is fully justified.
Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during the extended construction period, despite firm fixed-price.
Limited information on the contractor's past performance specifically on projects of this scale and type.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
Firm fixed-price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Long contract duration suggests a significant and potentially complex project, which DAVID BOLAND INC. may be well-equipped to handle.

Sector Analysis

Industrial building construction is a significant segment within the broader construction industry, often involving specialized requirements for government or commercial clients. Federal spending in this area supports infrastructure development and operational capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot or cost per unit of construction for similar industrial facilities built for federal agencies, considering factors like location, complexity, and materials.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false) and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem through this specific contract may be limited unless DAVID BOLAND INC. actively engages small businesses as subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and inspection divisions. The firm fixed-price nature provides a degree of accountability by capping the government's financial exposure. Transparency would be enhanced by public contract data, but detailed project progress and specific oversight reports are often internal or require specific Freedom of Information Act requests. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Federal Building and Facilities Construction
Department of Defense Procurement
Industrial Facility Development

Risk Flags

Potential for cost escalation over the long contract duration.
Lack of detailed project scope in available data.
Contractor performance history not readily available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.3 million to DAVID BOLAND INC. BASE BID AND OPTION ONE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAVID BOLAND INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-07-16. End: 2012-02-24.

What is the specific nature and scope of the industrial building construction project awarded to DAVID BOLAND INC.?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Industrial Building Construction' (nd: Industrial Building Construction) awarded by the Department of the Army (ag: Department of Defense, sa: Department of the Army). However, the specific details regarding the type of industrial building, its purpose (e.g., manufacturing, storage, maintenance), size, and location beyond the state of Missouri are not detailed in the provided data. The contract value of $29.3 million and a duration of 1318 days (approximately 3.6 years) suggest a substantial project. Without further documentation, such as the Statement of Work (SOW) or contract award details, the precise scope remains unspecified.

How does the awarded amount of $29.3 million compare to similar industrial building construction contracts by the Department of the Army?

Comparing the $29.3 million award to similar contracts requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurement. However, for a project spanning over three years, this amount is substantial but not necessarily outliers for major construction projects undertaken by the Department of the Army. The 'Industrial Building Construction' category can encompass a wide range of facilities, from warehouses to specialized manufacturing or maintenance depots. To provide a precise benchmark, one would need to analyze contracts with similar scopes, durations, and geographic locations, ideally looking at cost per square foot or cost per functional unit.

What is DAVID BOLAND INC.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly in industrial building construction?

The data shows DAVID BOLAND INC. as the awardee for this $29.3 million contract. To assess their track record, a review of their past federal contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of contract disputes or terminations would be necessary. Without this additional information, it's difficult to definitively gauge their experience and reliability for a project of this magnitude and duration. Their win on a full and open competition suggests they met the basic qualifications.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract of this duration?

While a firm fixed-price (pt: FIRM FIXED PRICE) contract generally shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor, a long duration (dur: 1318 days) introduces other potential risks. These include the risk of material price escalation beyond what was reasonably foreseeable, potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, and the possibility that the contractor's financial stability could be tested over such an extended period. Furthermore, if the initial price was set too low due to aggressive bidding, the contractor might be incentivized to cut corners on quality, although quality assurance measures should mitigate this. The government's risk is primarily in ensuring the contractor delivers the specified quality and performance within the agreed price.

How does the 'full and open competition' (ct: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION) impact the value for taxpayers in this specific contract?

The 'full and open competition' award method is generally beneficial for taxpayers. It ensures that multiple companies had the opportunity to bid on the contract, fostering a competitive environment that typically drives down prices and encourages innovation. With 6 bidders (no), the Department of the Army likely received a range of proposals, allowing them to select the offer that provided the best overall value, considering both price and technical factors. This method minimizes the risk of overpayment that can occur with sole-source or limited competition contracts.

What is the significance of the contract type being 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' (pt: FIRM FIXED PRICE) for this industrial building construction project?

A 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' contract type is significant because it establishes a ceiling price that the government will not exceed, regardless of the contractor's actual costs. This provides the government with cost certainty and predictability. For the contractor, it means they assume the primary risk for any cost overruns incurred during the project. This contract type is often preferred by the government for construction projects where the scope of work is well-defined, as it incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently to maximize their profit margin.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912NS08B0001

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: HZE

Contractor Details

Address: 509 S PALM AVE, TITUSVILLE, FL, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Emerging Small Business, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,348,809

Exercised Options: $29,348,809

Current Obligation: $29,348,809

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline