Department of the Army awards $13.6M contract for building envelope and interior restoration to J & J Maintenance Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,634,772 ($13.6M)

Contractor: J & J Maintenance Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-30

End Date: 2027-10-24

Contract Duration: 754 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN AND RESTORE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND GLAZED ASSEMBLIES OF THE BUILDING TO ACHIEVE A WATERTIGHT AND AIRTIGHT EXTERIOR. REPAIR AND RENEW INTERIOR OF BUILDING, INCLUDING LABORATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPACES.

Place of Performance

Location: FREDERICK, FREDERICK County, MARYLAND, 21702

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.6 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC for work described as: DESIGN AND RESTORE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND GLAZED ASSEMBLIES OF THE BUILDING TO ACHIEVE A WATERTIGHT AND AIRTIGHT EXTERIOR. REPAIR AND RENEW INTERIOR OF BUILDING, INCLUDING LABORATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPACES. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on critical building envelope and interior repairs, aiming to ensure a watertight and airtight exterior and renewed interior spaces. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The duration of the contract is 754 days, indicating a significant, multi-year project. 5. The project is located in Maryland, potentially impacting local construction workforce and material suppliers. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.6 million for building envelope and interior restoration appears reasonable given the scope of work, which includes both exterior envelope repairs and interior renovations for laboratory and administrative spaces. Benchmarking against similar large-scale building restoration projects would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract helps control costs, but the final expenditure will depend on the contractor's efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 3 bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this project. A higher number of bidders might have been expected for a contract of this size and scope, potentially leading to more aggressive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives the best value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army personnel who will utilize the improved laboratory and administrative spaces. The contract delivers essential services for maintaining and upgrading critical infrastructure, ensuring operational readiness. The geographic impact is localized to the specific facility in Maryland where the work will be performed. The project will likely create or sustain jobs within the construction sector in Maryland, including skilled trades and project management roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen structural issues are discovered during the renovation.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to manage complex interior renovations alongside exterior envelope work.
Risk of project delays due to weather or supply chain disruptions affecting materials.
Ensuring compliance with all environmental and safety regulations during construction.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract structure limits the government's exposure to cost increases.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process that should yield a fair price.
The project addresses critical infrastructure needs, enhancing the longevity and functionality of the facility.
The contractor, J & J Maintenance Inc., has experience in maintenance and repair services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the commercial and institutional building construction sector, a significant segment of the construction industry. This sector encompasses a wide range of projects, from office buildings to specialized facilities like laboratories. The total federal spending on construction services is substantial, and contracts like this contribute to maintaining and modernizing government-owned facilities. Benchmarking against similar projects would involve comparing the cost per square foot or cost per unit of work (e.g., per linear foot of facade repaired) with other government or private sector building restoration projects.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem may be limited unless J & J Maintenance Inc. actively engages small businesses as subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be necessary to fully assess the impact on small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army project management office. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to complete the work to specifications. Transparency can be assessed through contract award databases and any publicly available project status reports. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract performance.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Military Construction Projects
Government Building Renovations
Federal Infrastructure Modernization

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen conditions impacting cost and schedule.
Contractor performance history needs verification.
Scope creep risk if not managed tightly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.6 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC. DESIGN AND RESTORE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND GLAZED ASSEMBLIES OF THE BUILDING TO ACHIEVE A WATERTIGHT AND AIRTIGHT EXTERIOR. REPAIR AND RENEW INTERIOR OF BUILDING, INCLUDING LABORATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPACES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J & J MAINTENANCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-30. End: 2027-10-24.

What is the track record of J & J Maintenance Inc. with the Department of Defense and other federal agencies?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess J & J Maintenance Inc.'s track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of disputes or contract modifications. Understanding their experience with similar-sized projects, particularly those involving building envelope and interior restoration for government facilities, would provide insight into their capability and reliability. A history of successful project completion within budget and schedule for the Department of Defense would be a positive indicator.

How does the awarded price compare to similar building envelope and interior restoration projects?

To benchmark the value, we would need to compare the $13.6 million contract value against similar projects in terms of scope, size (square footage), complexity, and geographic location. Factors such as the extent of structural repairs, the type of interior spaces being renovated (e.g., specialized labs vs. standard offices), and the age and condition of the original building are crucial. Without specific comparable data points, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or fair value. However, the firm fixed-price nature and full and open competition suggest an effort to secure competitive pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract, beyond standard construction risks?

Beyond typical construction risks like weather delays or material shortages, specific risks for this contract could include the discovery of unforeseen hazardous materials (e.g., asbestos, lead paint) during demolition, which would necessitate additional remediation and potentially increase costs or timelines. The complexity of integrating modern building envelope systems (e.g., advanced insulation, waterproofing) with existing structures can also pose technical challenges. Furthermore, ensuring minimal disruption to ongoing laboratory and administrative functions during renovation requires careful phasing and coordination, presenting a logistical risk.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the operational effectiveness of the facility?

This contract is expected to significantly enhance the operational effectiveness of the facility. By achieving a watertight and airtight exterior, it will prevent water intrusion, which can cause structural damage, mold growth, and compromise sensitive equipment or materials within laboratories. Renewing interior spaces, including administrative areas, will improve the working environment for personnel, potentially boosting productivity and morale. Modernized facilities are also generally more energy-efficient and easier to maintain, contributing to long-term operational cost savings and reliability.

How has federal spending on building envelope and interior restoration projects trended in recent years?

Federal spending on building envelope and interior restoration projects has generally trended upwards in recent years, driven by an aging federal infrastructure portfolio requiring significant maintenance and modernization. Agencies like the Department of Defense, General Services Administration, and others consistently allocate substantial funds towards preserving and upgrading their facilities. Factors such as deferred maintenance, the need for energy efficiency upgrades, and adapting facilities to current operational requirements contribute to this sustained spending. Analyzing historical data for the specific agency and facility type would reveal more granular trends.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: J & J Maintenance, Inc.

Address: 8350 BROAD ST STE 1100, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,634,772

Exercised Options: $13,634,772

Current Obligation: $13,634,772

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DY25D0028

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline