DoD's $13.3M Commercial Building Construction Contract Awarded to David Boland Inc. in 2004

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,280,366 ($13.3M)

Contractor: David Boland Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-09-14

End Date: 2007-05-25

Contract Duration: 983 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Place of Performance

Location: FORT RILEY, GEARY County, KANSAS, 66442

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.3 million to DAVID BOLAND INC for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $13.3 million. 2. David Boland Inc. secured this contract. 3. The Department of the Army awarded this contract. 4. The contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. 5. It was awarded under full and open competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $13.3 million for commercial building construction appears reasonable given the duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects would provide a clearer picture of its value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best possible price for the construction services.

Public Impact

This contract supports infrastructure development within the Department of the Army. The construction project likely created jobs in the Kansas region. The successful completion of this project contributes to military readiness and operational capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration of 983 days is lengthy, potentially increasing risk of cost overruns or scope creep.
No indication of small business participation.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on government infrastructure needs and economic conditions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities were pursued.

Oversight & Accountability

The award under full and open competition suggests a degree of oversight in the procurement process. However, the long duration warrants monitoring for performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration (983 days).
No indication of small business participation.
Potential for cost overruns due to extended timeline.
Scope creep risk over the contract's duration.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.3 million to DAVID BOLAND INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAVID BOLAND INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-14. End: 2007-05-25.

What was the specific scope of work for this commercial building construction contract, and how did it align with the Army's needs?

The contract was for Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, awarded to David Boland Inc. by the Department of the Army. While the specific scope isn't detailed, such contracts typically involve the design and/or construction of facilities like barracks, administrative buildings, or training centers. Its alignment with Army needs would depend on the strategic infrastructure priorities at the time of award in 2004.

Given the 983-day duration, what were the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated?

The primary risks for a contract of this length include potential cost escalation due to material price fluctuations, unforeseen site conditions, and contractor performance issues. Mitigation strategies could involve robust contract clauses for change orders, regular progress reviews, and performance bonds. The firm-fixed-price nature also places cost risk on the contractor.

How effective was the full and open competition in ensuring the best value for the government on this $13.3 million contract?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for achieving best value by maximizing the number of potential bidders and fostering price competition. Without access to the bid data, it's difficult to definitively assess effectiveness, but the process itself is designed to yield competitive pricing and a suitable contractor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 509 SOUTH PALM AVENUE, TITUSVILLE, FL, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline