DoD awards $10.9M facilities support contract to Ben Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, L.L.C. for 3 years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,869,644 ($10.9M)
Contractor: BEN Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, L.L.C.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-09-20
End Date: 2026-09-27
Contract Duration: 1,103 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: BASE PERIOD FIS REGION 1 CONTRACT AWARD
Place of Performance
Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19103
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.9 million to BEN FITZGERALD REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C. for work described as: BASE PERIOD FIS REGION 1 CONTRACT AWARD Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and scope of facilities support services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract is a firm-fixed-price type, which transfers some risk to the contractor. 4. Performance is in Pennsylvania, impacting the local workforce and economy. 5. The contractor has a track record with the Department of the Army. 6. This contract falls under facilities support services, a common government need.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $10.9 million over three years for facilities support services appears to be within a reasonable range when compared to similar government contracts for comparable services. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has priced the services to cover all anticipated costs and profit, and the government is protected from cost overruns. Benchmarking against market rates for facilities management in Pennsylvania would provide further insight, but initial assessment indicates fair value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple potential bidders were solicited and allowed to submit proposals. The presence of two bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, the full and open nature is a positive sign for price discovery and ensuring a fair market approach.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a wider pool of contractors to bid, potentially leading to more competitive pricing and better value for the government's investment.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Army, which will receive essential facilities support services. Services include maintenance, repair, and operational support for government facilities. The geographic impact is localized to Pennsylvania, where the facilities are located. This contract will likely support local jobs within the facilities management sector in Pennsylvania.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not clearly defined in the delivery order.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities operations.
- Ensuring consistent service quality throughout the contract duration.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost uncertainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
- Contract awarded to a known entity within the Department of the Army.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of federal buildings and infrastructure. The market size is substantial, with agencies consistently requiring these services across numerous locations. This contract fits within the broader category of base operations support and real property maintenance, aligning with typical government spending patterns for facility upkeep.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates no explicit subcontracting requirements for small businesses were mandated in this specific award. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for support. Further review of the contract details would be needed to ascertain any indirect effects or subcontracting plans.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics and oversight reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support Services
- Real Property Maintenance
- Facilities Management Contracts
- Department of Defense Contracts
- Army Facilities Maintenance
Risk Flags
- Potential for service quality degradation if not closely monitored.
- Risk of unforeseen maintenance needs exceeding fixed-price budget.
- Dependence on contractor personnel for critical operations.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, facilities-support-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, pennsylvania, delivery-order, services-contract, real-estate-services, base-period
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.9 million to BEN FITZGERALD REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C.. BASE PERIOD FIS REGION 1 CONTRACT AWARD
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BEN FITZGERALD REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-09-20. End: 2026-09-27.
What is the track record of Ben Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, L.L.C. with the Department of Defense?
Ben Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, L.L.C. has a history of contracting with the Department of the Army, as indicated by this award. Further analysis of federal procurement data would reveal the extent and nature of their past performance, including the types of services rendered, contract values, and any performance evaluations or disputes. Understanding their prior experience with similar facilities support contracts is crucial for assessing their capability to meet the requirements of this new award effectively and efficiently.
How does the $10.9 million contract value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the DoD?
The $10.9 million contract value over approximately three years for facilities support services appears to be within a reasonable range for a contract of this scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar contracts awarded by the Department of Defense for facilities management in the same geographic region or for comparable facility types would provide a more precise comparison. Factors such as the specific services included (e.g., janitorial, groundskeeping, minor repairs, security) and the size/complexity of the facilities managed would influence the overall cost. Without more granular data on comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents exceptional value, but it does not immediately appear to be an outlier.
What are the primary risks associated with this facilities support contract?
Key risks associated with this facilities support contract include potential service quality issues if performance standards are not rigorously monitored, contractor underperformance leading to disruptions in facility operations, and the possibility of unforeseen maintenance needs or emergencies that could strain the fixed-price budget. There's also a risk related to contractor personnel, such as turnover or security clearances, which could impact service continuity. Furthermore, if the scope of work is not precisely defined, scope creep could lead to cost increases or disputes. The government's ability to effectively manage and oversee the contract is paramount to mitigating these risks.
How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in managing costs for facilities support?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in managing costs for services where the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. For facilities support, FFP transfers the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, incentivizing them to control expenses and operate efficiently. This provides cost certainty for the government. However, if unforeseen issues arise that are outside the contractor's control or were not anticipated in the scope, the FFP structure can lead to disputes or requests for contract modifications. Robust initial scope definition and clear performance standards are crucial for the success of FFP in this context.
What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services within the Department of the Army?
The Department of the Army consistently allocates significant funding towards facilities support services, reflecting the vast real estate portfolio and operational needs across its installations. Historical spending trends typically show a steady demand for these services, driven by the maintenance and upkeep of buildings, grounds, and infrastructure. While specific annual figures fluctuate based on budget allocations, modernization efforts, and operational tempo, facilities support remains a core and substantial expenditure category. Analyzing multi-year spending data would reveal patterns in contract values, types of services procured, and the distribution of awards across different regions and contractors.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912BU23R0042
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 100 INDEPENDENCE PLACE STE 222, TYLER, TX, 75703
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,695,040
Exercised Options: $10,869,644
Current Obligation: $10,869,644
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS06Q17BQDS204
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-09-20
Current End Date: 2026-09-27
Potential End Date: 2029-03-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-29
More Contracts from BEN Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, L.L.C.
- Prev. Maint. Task Order — $25.6M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Facilties Investment Services — $11.8M (Department of Defense)
- Installation of Fire Annunciator, Chilled Water Pump, Roof Fall Recert Virginia Smith Federal Building, 300 East 3RD ST., North Platte, NE 69101.(general Services Administration) — $38.5K (General Services Administration)
- TX Bolinas Emergency Hvac Repairs — $8.2K (Department of Homeland Security)
View all BEN Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, L.L.C. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)