DHS awards $25.6M for facilities support services to Ben Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,639,778 ($25.6M)

Contractor: BEN Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2020-09-01

End Date: 2026-02-28

Contract Duration: 2,006 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PREV. MAINT. TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: IMPERIAL, IMPERIAL County, CALIFORNIA, 92251

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $25.6 million to BEN FITZGERALD REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C. for work described as: PREV. MAINT. TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract value of $25.6M over its period of performance. 2. Services include facilities support, crucial for operational continuity. 3. Contract awarded through full and open competition. 4. Performance period spans from September 2020 to February 2026. 5. The contract is a firm-fixed-price type, indicating predictable costs. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 561210. 7. The contract is a delivery order under a larger contract. 8. The principal place of performance is California.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $25.6M for facilities support services appears reasonable given the extended performance period of over five years. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities management in large federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps manage cost uncertainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating a robust competitive process. While the exact number of bidders is not specified, this method generally ensures a wide range of potential offerors are considered, leading to better price discovery and potentially more innovative solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it is designed to solicit the best possible pricing and service offerings from a broad market, maximizing the value of federal dollars.

Public Impact

Federal agencies, specifically U.S. Customs and Border Protection, benefit from reliable facilities support services. Ensures the operational readiness and maintenance of government facilities. Services are geographically focused within California. Supports the facilities management and maintenance workforce in California.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if performance is not closely monitored.
Reliance on a single delivery order may limit future competition if not managed strategically.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Long-term contract allows for stable service provision.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This sector is characterized by a mix of large established firms and smaller specialized providers. The market size for federal facilities management is substantial, driven by the government's extensive real estate portfolio. This contract represents a portion of that spending, focusing on operational maintenance and support.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation and its impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is typically managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Performance standards and reporting requirements within the contract would dictate accountability. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics may not be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules
Facilities Maintenance and Operations Contracts

Risk Flags

Performance Risk
Cost Overrun Risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $25.6 million to BEN FITZGERALD REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C.. PREV. MAINT. TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BEN FITZGERALD REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Customs and Border Protection).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-09-01. End: 2026-02-28.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by U.S. Customs and Border Protection?

Analyzing historical spending for facilities support services by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requires examining contract awards over several fiscal years. While this specific contract is for $25.6 million, CBP's overall spending in this category can fluctuate based on agency needs, facility upgrades, and the number of active contracts. Previous awards might include similar services under different contract vehicles or for specific installations. A comprehensive review of CBP's contracting data, potentially including data from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or USASpending.gov, would reveal trends in spending, average contract values, and the types of services most frequently procured. This context is crucial for understanding if the current award is in line with historical investment in facilities management.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by other Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agencies?

To compare pricing, one would need to identify similar facilities support contracts awarded by other DHS components (e.g., FEMA, TSA, Coast Guard) around the same period. Key comparison points would include the scope of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, groundskeeping, security systems maintenance), the size and type of facilities managed, and the contract duration. Analyzing the per-square-foot cost or cost per facility managed, adjusted for geographic location and service complexity, would provide a benchmark. If this contract's pricing is significantly higher or lower than comparable contracts, it could indicate either exceptional value or potential issues with cost-effectiveness. Without access to detailed pricing breakdowns and comparable contract data, a definitive assessment is challenging.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is contractor performance being monitored?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) for facilities support services typically revolve around service availability, response times for maintenance requests, quality of work (e.g., cleanliness, functionality of systems), safety compliance, and cost control. The contract likely specifies these KPIs and the metrics used to measure them. Monitoring is usually conducted by a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) or a Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) within U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This involves regular site visits, review of performance reports submitted by the contractor, and feedback from facility users. The contract's performance clauses would outline the process for addressing deficiencies and potential remedies for non-performance, ensuring accountability.

What is the track record of Ben Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, LLC in performing federal contracts, particularly in facilities management?

Assessing the track record of Ben Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, LLC involves reviewing their past performance on federal contracts. This includes examining contract histories for on-time delivery, quality of services, adherence to budget, and any past performance issues or disputes. Databases like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) can provide insights into past performance evaluations, though access may be limited. Understanding their experience with similar-sized contracts and the specific types of facilities support services they have provided is crucial. A history of successful contract completion suggests a lower risk for this current award, while a pattern of issues might raise concerns about the contractor's capability to meet the requirements.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the small business industrial base in California?

The impact on the small business industrial base in California depends heavily on whether Ben Fitzgerald Real Estate Services, LLC is a small business itself or if it intends to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses. If the prime contractor is a large business, the contract's value for small businesses would be realized through subcontracting opportunities. The specific requirements of the facilities support services could lend themselves to specialized small business contractors (e.g., for janitorial, landscaping, or specific repair services). Without explicit subcontracting plans or set-aside provisions, the direct benefit to the small business ecosystem might be limited, but indirect benefits through the supply chain are possible. Further investigation into subcontracting goals would clarify this impact.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 INDEPENDENCE PLACE STE 222, TYLER, TX, 75703

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,639,778

Exercised Options: $25,639,778

Current Obligation: $25,639,778

Actual Outlays: $14,938,237

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS06Q17BQDS204

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline