DoD awards $22M for facility maintenance at medical center, with J & J Maintenance Inc. securing the contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,078,978 ($22.1M)
Contractor: J & J Maintenance Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-12-26
End Date: 2026-05-26
Contract Duration: 882 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: O&M WITH REPAIR AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT ALEXANDER T. AUGUSTA MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER, FORT BELVOIR, VA (FORMERLY FORT BELVOIR COMMUNITY HOSPITAL)
Place of Performance
Location: FORT BELVOIR, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22060
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.1 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC for work described as: O&M WITH REPAIR AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT ALEXANDER T. AUGUSTA MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER, FORT BELVOIR, VA (FORMERLY FORT BELVOIR COMMUNITY HOSPITAL) Key points: 1. The contract value of $22.1 million over approximately 3 years suggests a moderate annual spend for facility operations and maintenance. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process that could lead to favorable pricing. 3. The contract is a firm-fixed-price type, which shifts cost risk to the contractor, providing budget certainty for the government. 4. The contractor, J & J Maintenance Inc., has secured this definitive contract, but their specific track record for similar large-scale medical facility maintenance requires further review. 5. The services encompass operations, maintenance, repair, and minor construction, indicating a comprehensive scope for the medical center's infrastructure. 6. The contract's duration of 882 days (approx. 2.4 years) allows for sustained service delivery and performance evaluation.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $22.1 million for nearly three years of operations and maintenance at a military medical center appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large healthcare facilities or military installations would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure offers predictable costs for the Department of Defense. However, without specific details on the scope of work and service levels, a definitive comparison to market rates for similar services is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, with five bids received. This level of competition is generally positive, suggesting that multiple capable contractors had the opportunity to bid, which can drive down prices and encourage innovation. The presence of five bidders indicates a healthy market interest in this type of federal contract.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition with multiple bidders is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of securing services at a competitive price, maximizing the value of federal funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the personnel and patients of the Alexander T. Augusta Military Medical Center, who will experience maintained and potentially improved facility conditions. The services delivered include essential operations, maintenance, repair, and minor construction, ensuring the functional integrity and safety of the medical facility. The geographic impact is localized to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, supporting the critical infrastructure of this military installation. The contract supports the workforce employed by J & J Maintenance Inc. and potentially its subcontractors, contributing to local employment in the Virginia area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The specific experience and past performance of J & J Maintenance Inc. on contracts of similar size and complexity, particularly within the healthcare or military facility management sector, needs thorough vetting.
- The definition and scope of 'minor construction' should be clearly delineated to prevent scope creep and ensure alignment with the intended maintenance and repair objectives.
- Ensuring robust quality assurance and performance monitoring mechanisms are in place will be crucial to guarantee the contractor meets all service level agreements.
Positive Signals
- The use of full and open competition with five bidders suggests a competitive environment that likely led to a fair market price.
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, mitigating the risk of budget overruns related to service delivery.
- The contract's duration allows for a sustained period of service, potentially leading to greater efficiency and familiarity with the facility's needs by the contractor.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on the operations and maintenance of a large-scale medical facility. The federal government is a significant consumer of such services, particularly for its extensive portfolio of military bases and healthcare facilities. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining operational readiness and the well-being of service members and their families. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing contracts for facilities management at other large government installations or major hospital complexes.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor is J & J Maintenance Inc., there is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans with small businesses. Further investigation into the contractor's subcontracting goals and actual performance would be necessary to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting office and the relevant facility management personnel at Fort Belvoir. Accountability measures will be tied to the firm-fixed-price contract terms and performance metrics. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed performance reports may not be publicly accessible. The Inspector General's office for the Department of Defense would have jurisdiction in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Military Base Operations and Maintenance
- Healthcare Facility Management
- Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
- Department of Defense Construction Projects
Risk Flags
- Contractor Performance Risk
- Scope Definition Risk
- Budgetary Risk (if unforeseen issues arise)
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, facility-maintenance, operations-and-maintenance, medical-center, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, definitive-contract, virginia, construction, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.1 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC. O&M WITH REPAIR AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT ALEXANDER T. AUGUSTA MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER, FORT BELVOIR, VA (FORMERLY FORT BELVOIR COMMUNITY HOSPITAL)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is J & J MAINTENANCE INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-12-26. End: 2026-05-26.
What is the track record of J & J Maintenance Inc. in managing similar-sized federal contracts, particularly for military medical facilities?
A comprehensive review of J & J Maintenance Inc.'s contract history is necessary to assess their capability in managing federal contracts of this magnitude, especially those involving complex military medical facilities. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any documented issues or disputes on previous contracts, and their experience with firm-fixed-price agreements. Understanding their success in delivering similar services (operations, maintenance, repair, minor construction) on time and within budget for comparable government entities would provide critical insight into their reliability and expertise for the Alexander T. Augusta Military Medical Center contract.
How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar facility maintenance services at large medical installations?
To benchmark the $22.1 million contract value, a detailed analysis of the specific scope of work is required. This includes the square footage of the facility, the types of maintenance required (preventive, corrective, predictive), the extent of repair and minor construction activities, and the required service levels. Comparing this to publicly available data on contracts for similar-sized hospitals or large institutional facilities, adjusted for geographic location and specific service inclusions, would reveal whether the price is competitive. Factors like the firm-fixed-price nature can influence the initial bid price compared to cost-plus contracts.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract, and how will performance be monitored?
The contract likely includes specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) designed to ensure the effective operation and maintenance of the Alexander T. Augusta Military Medical Center. These might include response times for emergency repairs, preventive maintenance completion rates, energy efficiency targets, and facility cleanliness standards. Performance monitoring is typically conducted by government representatives, such as contracting officers' representatives (CORs), who will track the contractor's adherence to these metrics through regular reporting, site inspections, and potentially automated systems. Failure to meet KPIs or SLAs could result in penalties or contract termination.
What is the historical spending pattern for facility maintenance at the Alexander T. Augusta Military Medical Center (or its predecessor)?
Analyzing historical spending for facility maintenance at the Alexander T. Augusta Military Medical Center, or its predecessor (Fort Belvoir Community Hospital), is crucial for understanding trends and assessing the current contract's value. This involves reviewing past contract awards for similar services, noting any significant increases or decreases in spending, and identifying the contractors involved. Understanding if this $22.1 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment compared to previous years can provide context on the government's commitment to facility upkeep and potential shifts in maintenance strategies or contractor performance.
Are there any identified risks associated with J & J Maintenance Inc. or the nature of the services being contracted?
Potential risks associated with this contract could include the contractor's capacity to manage a facility of this size and complexity, especially given it's a military medical center with unique operational demands. Risks might also stem from the firm-fixed-price structure if unforeseen issues arise that significantly increase costs for the contractor, potentially impacting service quality if not managed effectively. Furthermore, the scope of 'minor construction' needs clear definition to mitigate risks of scope creep. A thorough review of the contractor's past performance, financial stability, and any prior performance issues would help identify specific risks related to J & J Maintenance Inc.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W9127823R0053
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: J & J Maintenance, Inc.
Address: 7710 RIALTO BLVD, AUSTIN, TX, 78735
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $38,402,652
Exercised Options: $22,078,978
Current Obligation: $22,078,978
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-12-26
Current End Date: 2026-05-26
Potential End Date: 2028-05-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-14
More Contracts from J & J Maintenance Inc
- Repair/Renewal- Construction — $211.2M (Department of Defense)
- Healthcare Housekeeping Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort SAM Houston, TX — $174.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200206!000140!5700!BA05 !10 Abw/Lgc !F0561101C0001 !A!N! !Y! !20020304!20030228!055124077!055124077!055124077!N!J & J Maintenance, Inc !3755 S Capital of Texas H!austin !tx!78704!00870!041!08!air Force Academy !EL Paso !colorado !+000000505080!n!n!000000000000!m152!operation/Maintenance Buildings !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!m!2!002!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $144.1M (Department of Defense)
- Maintenance Contract - MG 2 — $77.0M (Department of Defense)
- NEW Task Order, O&M Services — $67.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)