Fort Campbell O&M contract awarded to J & J Maintenance Inc. for over $14.8 million
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,893,536 ($14.9M)
Contractor: J & J Maintenance Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-09-30
End Date: 2026-09-14
Contract Duration: 1,080 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: O&M WITH REPAIRS AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT FORT CAMPBELL, KY
Place of Performance
Location: FORT CAMPBELL, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42223
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.9 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC for work described as: O&M WITH REPAIRS AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT FORT CAMPBELL, KY Key points: 1. Contract focuses on operations, maintenance, repairs, and minor construction at Fort Campbell. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is a firm-fixed-price definitive contract, providing cost certainty. 4. Duration of over 3 years indicates a significant, ongoing need for these services. 5. The base award amount is substantial, reflecting the scale of facility management required. 6. Geographic focus on Kentucky highlights regional economic impact.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The base award of $13,790,000 for O&M services at Fort Campbell appears reasonable given the contract's duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facility maintenance contracts for military installations suggests this pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure helps mitigate cost overruns for the government. Further analysis would require detailed breakdowns of the services included and comparison to specific line-item costs in similar contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 4 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive environment is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives a fair market price for the services rendered.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to better pricing for taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment among potential contractors.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Army, ensuring the operational readiness and upkeep of facilities at Fort Campbell. Services include essential operations, maintenance, and repairs to buildings and infrastructure. The contract has a direct impact on the Fort Campbell installation located in Kentucky. Potential workforce implications include job creation for maintenance, repair, and construction personnel in the local Kentucky area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if minor construction requirements are not clearly defined.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical facility maintenance could pose risks if performance issues arise.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
- Longer contract duration allows for stable service provision and potential for contractor investment in efficiency.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on facility operations and maintenance. The market for such services supporting large government installations is significant, often involving specialized firms capable of handling extensive infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale O&M contracts awarded to support military bases or similar government facilities across the country.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that larger, established firms were likely the primary bidders and awardees. The absence of specific small business provisions may limit direct opportunities for smaller entities within this particular contract's execution, though they may participate in the broader construction market.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and relevant Army facilities management personnel at Fort Campbell. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available, though detailed performance metrics and oversight reports may not be readily accessible to the public.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support (BOS)
- Facility Maintenance and Repair Contracts
- Military Construction Projects
- Government Real Property Management
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost growth beyond base award if not managed.
- Performance risk associated with ensuring consistent quality of maintenance and repair services.
Tags
construction, operations-and-maintenance, facility-management, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, fort-campbell, kentucky, full-and-open-competition, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.9 million to J & J MAINTENANCE INC. O&M WITH REPAIRS AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT FORT CAMPBELL, KY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is J & J MAINTENANCE INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-09-30. End: 2026-09-14.
What is the historical spending pattern for O&M services at Fort Campbell?
Analyzing historical spending for O&M at Fort Campbell requires access to past contract data. Typically, such facilities require consistent funding for maintenance and repairs. Previous contracts might have varied in scope, duration, and awardee. A trend of increasing or decreasing spending could indicate changes in facility condition, investment priorities, or the efficiency of service providers. Without specific historical data for Fort Campbell, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but large military installations generally have multi-million dollar annual budgets dedicated to facility upkeep.
How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or ceiling of the contract?
The provided data shows a base award of $13,790,000 and a total obligation of $14,893,536.14. This suggests that the initial award was for the base amount, and the additional obligation represents task orders or modifications that have been exercised or are anticipated within the contract's potential value. The contract's ceiling, if different from the total obligation, would represent the maximum amount the government could spend. The difference between the base award and the total obligation indicates that some scope beyond the initial baseline has been funded, which is common for indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity or definitive contracts with potential for growth.
What specific types of repairs and minor construction are covered under this contract?
The contract description mentions 'O&M WITH REPAIRS AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION'. Specific details on the types of repairs and minor construction would typically be found in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). Generally, this could include routine maintenance (HVAC, plumbing, electrical), structural repairs, interior/exterior building upkeep, minor renovations, and potentially small-scale construction projects that do not meet the threshold for major military construction. The scope is defined to ensure the operational readiness and safety of facilities at Fort Campbell.
What is the track record of J & J Maintenance Inc. with government contracts?
To assess J & J Maintenance Inc.'s track record, one would need to examine their past performance on federal contracts. This includes reviewing contract history for similar services, past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. A positive track record typically involves successful completion of previous contracts, adherence to schedules and budgets, and positive feedback from government agencies. Without access to a comprehensive database of their past performance, a definitive assessment cannot be made based solely on this award.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract?
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for an O&M contract like this are crucial for ensuring service quality and contractor performance. While not explicitly provided in the summary data, typical KPIs would likely include response times for service requests, completion rates for scheduled maintenance, quality of repairs (e.g., defect rates), adherence to safety standards, and overall facility condition assessments. The government would monitor these KPIs to ensure the contractor meets the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
Are there any specific environmental or sustainability requirements included in the contract?
Government contracts, especially those involving facility maintenance and construction, often incorporate environmental and sustainability requirements. These could include mandates for using eco-friendly materials, proper waste disposal and recycling, energy efficiency standards in repairs and minor construction, and compliance with environmental regulations. The specific inclusion and stringency of these requirements would be detailed in the contract's SOW or PWS, reflecting current federal environmental policies.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W9127823R0049
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: J & J Maintenance, Inc.
Address: 7710 RIALTO BLVD STE 200, AUSTIN, TX, 78735
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,074,785
Exercised Options: $14,893,536
Current Obligation: $14,893,536
Actual Outlays: $1,162,244
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-09-30
Current End Date: 2026-09-14
Potential End Date: 2028-09-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-09
More Contracts from J & J Maintenance Inc
- Repair/Renewal- Construction — $211.2M (Department of Defense)
- Healthcare Housekeeping Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort SAM Houston, TX — $174.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200206!000140!5700!BA05 !10 Abw/Lgc !F0561101C0001 !A!N! !Y! !20020304!20030228!055124077!055124077!055124077!N!J & J Maintenance, Inc !3755 S Capital of Texas H!austin !tx!78704!00870!041!08!air Force Academy !EL Paso !colorado !+000000505080!n!n!000000000000!m152!operation/Maintenance Buildings !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!m!2!002!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $144.1M (Department of Defense)
- Maintenance Contract - MG 2 — $77.0M (Department of Defense)
- NEW Task Order, O&M Services — $67.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)