DoD awards $18.2M food service contract to Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency for one year
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,242,527 ($18.2M)
Contractor: Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-07-23
End Date: 2026-07-22
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $50.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FULL FOOD SERVICE 23 JULY 2025 - 22 JULY 2026
Place of Performance
Location: AUGUSTA, RICHMOND County, GEORGIA, 30905
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $18.2 million to GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY for work described as: FULL FOOD SERVICE 23 JULY 2025 - 22 JULY 2026 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in essential support services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust market for food services. 3. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. Contract duration of one year allows for regular performance review. 5. Geographic concentration in Georgia may indicate regional service needs. 6. The award to a vocational rehabilitation agency highlights potential social impact.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $18.2 million for a one-year food service delivery order appears reasonable given the scope of services typically required by the Department of the Army. Benchmarking against similar large-scale food service contracts within the federal government would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the primary financial risk, which can be a positive indicator for cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely invited to bid. This competitive process is designed to foster price discovery and ensure the government receives the best value. The number of bidders, if available, would further clarify the intensity of the competition and its potential impact on pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: A fully competed contract generally leads to more competitive pricing, which is beneficial for taxpayers by ensuring funds are used efficiently.
Public Impact
Military personnel and potentially civilian staff at the Georgia-based facility will receive food services. The contract supports the operational readiness of the Department of the Army by ensuring essential life support. Services are geographically concentrated within Georgia. The award to the Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency may provide employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities, aligning with the agency's mission.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for service disruptions if contractor performance falters.
- Ensuring consistent quality and nutritional standards across all meals.
- Managing potential cost overruns if unforeseen circumstances arise, despite fixed-price.
Positive Signals
- Award to a vocational rehabilitation agency aligns with social responsibility goals.
- Fixed-price contract incentivizes contractor efficiency.
- Full and open competition suggests a healthy market and potential for good value.
Sector Analysis
The food service industry is a critical component of government operations, supporting personnel across various agencies and military branches. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on food preparation and catering. The market for federal food service contracts is substantial, with numerous companies, including large corporations and specialized providers, competing for these opportunities. The value of this specific contract is significant for a one-year duration, suggesting a substantial requirement.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency, may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill specific aspects of the contract, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting command. Performance will be monitored against the terms and conditions of the delivery order, including service level agreements and quality standards. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics are often internal.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Food Service Contracts
- Federal Food and Beverage Services
- Vocational Rehabilitation Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential performance risk due to contractor's primary mission focus.
- Ensuring consistent quality and safety standards in food preparation.
- Scalability of operations to meet military demand.
Tags
defense, department-of-the-army, food-service, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, georgia, vocational-rehabilitation, support-services, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $18.2 million to GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY. FULL FOOD SERVICE 23 JULY 2025 - 22 JULY 2026
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-07-23. End: 2026-07-22.
What is the track record of the Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency in performing similar federal contracts?
Information regarding the Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency's specific track record with federal contracts of this magnitude and type is not readily available in the provided data. As a state-level vocational rehabilitation agency, its primary mission is typically focused on employment services for individuals with disabilities. While it may have experience in managing large-scale operations, its history as a direct federal contractor for food services would need to be independently verified through federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS. Assessing past performance, including on-time delivery, quality of service, and adherence to budget, is crucial for understanding the risk associated with this award.
How does the awarded amount compare to historical spending on food services by the Department of the Army in Georgia?
To compare the awarded amount of $18.2 million to historical spending, one would need to access historical contract data for food services procured by the Department of the Army specifically within Georgia. This would involve querying federal procurement databases for contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (e.g., 722310) and geographic locations over previous fiscal years. Analyzing trends in spending, contract values, and the number of awarded contracts would reveal whether this award is consistent with past patterns, represents an increase or decrease, and if it aligns with inflation or changes in service requirements. Without this historical context, it is difficult to definitively assess if the current award is an outlier or within expected parameters.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this food service contract, and how will they be measured?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) for a federal food service contract typically revolve around food quality, nutritional standards, timeliness of service, sanitation and safety compliance, and customer satisfaction. Specific KPIs would be detailed within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS). For instance, KPIs might include adherence to specific dietary guidelines, a maximum wait time for meal service, a minimum score on health inspections, and a target percentage of positive feedback from service members. Measurement methods often involve regular inspections, audits, user surveys, and contractor self-reporting, with defined remedies or incentives tied to performance outcomes.
What is the potential impact of this contract on the small business food service providers in Georgia?
While this contract was awarded through full and open competition and not set aside for small businesses, its impact on small business food service providers in Georgia could be indirect. The prime contractor, Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency, may utilize small businesses for subcontracting opportunities, such as sourcing local ingredients or specialized catering services. However, the presence of a large federal contract awarded to a non-traditional entity like a vocational rehabilitation agency could also mean less direct opportunity for small businesses that typically compete for such prime contracts. The overall effect depends on the prime contractor's subcontracting strategy and the competitive landscape for food services in the region.
Are there any specific risks associated with awarding a food service contract to a vocational rehabilitation agency?
A primary consideration when awarding a food service contract to a vocational rehabilitation agency is ensuring the agency possesses the requisite operational capacity, management expertise, and robust quality control systems to meet the demanding standards of federal food service. While these agencies excel in their core mission, large-scale food service requires specialized logistics, supply chain management, and adherence to strict health and safety regulations. Potential risks include challenges in scaling operations, maintaining consistent service quality, and managing a large workforce effectively. Robust oversight and clear performance expectations are critical to mitigate these risks and ensure mission success.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Accommodation and Food Services › Special Food Services › Food Service Contractors
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5238 ROYAL WOODS, TUCKER, GA, 30084
Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business, U.S. Regional/State Government
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $25,076,776
Exercised Options: $25,076,776
Current Obligation: $18,242,527
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9124J20D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-07-23
Current End Date: 2026-07-22
Potential End Date: 2026-07-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-30
More Contracts from Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency
- 200312!000945!2100!BK03 !ACA, Fort Benning !dabk0303c0018 !A!N! !Y! !20030718!20130630!083957956!083957956!083957956!n!labor, Georgia Department of !5238 Royal Woods Pkwy STE !tucker !ga!30084!30760!215!13!fort Benning !muscogee !georgia !+000004805892!n!n!000278197304!s203!food Services !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !722310!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!006!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!Z!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! !dabk03!0001! ! — $496.1M (Department of Defense)
- Full Food Service FT Gordon GA Dining Facilities — $90.5M (Department of Defense)
- Full Food Services — $81.1M (Department of Defense)
- Food Services, Fletc Glynco Campus, GA: the Contractor Shall Provide ALL Labor, Supplies, Materials, Equipment and Supervision Necessary to Serve Three Meals in Bldg. 75 and Lunch in Bldg. 260 — $75.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Full Food Services - Fort Moore, GA — $65.9M (Department of Defense)
View all Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)