Fort Moore food services contract awarded at $65.87M, highlighting significant investment in military base support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $65,867,741 ($65.9M)

Contractor: Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-07-01

End Date: 2025-06-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $181.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FULL FOOD SERVICES - FORT MOORE, GA

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BENNING, CHATTAHOOCHEE County, GEORGIA, 31905

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $65.9 million to GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY for work described as: FULL FOOD SERVICES - FORT MOORE, GA Key points: 1. The contract value represents a substantial commitment to maintaining essential services for military personnel. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process, which can drive better pricing. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost risk to the contractor, encouraging efficient service delivery. 4. This award is a key component of the Army's broader strategy for base operations and soldier welfare. 5. The duration of the contract (364 days) indicates a need for consistent, ongoing food service provision. 6. The contract's value is benchmarked against similar large-scale food service contracts for military installations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $65.87 million for one year of food services at Fort Moore appears within the expected range for large military installations. Benchmarking against similar contracts for base support reveals that costs for comprehensive food services can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the size of the installation and the scope of services. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the government has negotiated a set price, which is generally favorable for cost predictability, assuming the contractor's bid was competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach typically fosters a robust bidding environment, potentially leading to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the method of competition suggests that multiple companies vied for this significant contract, which is a positive sign for price discovery and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a marketplace where contractors are incentivized to offer their best pricing and service to win the contract. This reduces the likelihood of inflated costs that can occur with less competitive procurement methods.

Public Impact

Military personnel and their families stationed at Fort Moore, Georgia, will benefit from consistent and reliable food services. The contract ensures the delivery of essential catering and food preparation services, contributing to the morale and well-being of service members. The geographic impact is concentrated at Fort Moore, Georgia, supporting the local economy through contractor operations. This contract supports jobs within the food service industry, potentially including both skilled culinary professionals and support staff employed by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service disruptions if the contractor faces operational challenges.
Risk of price increases in future contract renewals if competition diminishes.
Dependence on contractor's ability to maintain food safety and quality standards.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost overruns for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for these services.
Contract duration provides stability for service delivery and planning.

Sector Analysis

The food service industry for government contracts is a significant sector, often characterized by large, multi-year agreements. This contract falls within the broader category of support services for government facilities, specifically catering to the needs of military personnel. Comparable spending benchmarks for large military bases often show annual food service contracts in the tens of millions of dollars, reflecting the scale of operations and the number of individuals served. The market includes specialized contractors adept at meeting the unique logistical and quality demands of military environments.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside. While the prime contractor is not identified as a small business, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors to the prime awardee. The extent of small business subcontracting will depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the specific requirements outlined in the contract, which could impact the small business ecosystem around Fort Moore.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and program management offices at Fort Moore. Performance standards and quality assurance will be monitored to ensure compliance with the contract terms. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational oversight specifics are typically internal. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Military Base Support Services
Food and Hospitality Services
Government Catering Contracts
Department of Defense Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for cost increases in future contract periods due to market fluctuations.
Risk of service quality degradation if contractor faces financial or operational difficulties.
Dependence on contractor's ability to manage supply chain and food safety effectively.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $65.9 million to GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY. FULL FOOD SERVICES - FORT MOORE, GA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $65.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-07-01. End: 2025-06-30.

What is the historical spending trend for food services at Fort Moore?

Analyzing historical spending for food services at Fort Moore requires access to past contract awards. Typically, large military installations have recurring needs for food services, leading to consistent annual expenditures. Without specific historical data for this installation, it's difficult to provide precise figures. However, based on the current $65.87 million award for a 364-day period, it suggests a significant and sustained investment in this area. Trends in military base operations, troop levels, and changes in service scope can influence year-over-year spending. Fluctuations might also occur due to shifts in contracting strategies, such as moving from multiple smaller contracts to a single large one, or vice versa.

How does the per-meal cost compare to other military bases or similar government facilities?

To accurately compare the per-meal cost, we would need the total number of meals served under this contract and the total contract value. The provided data includes the total contract value ($65.87 million) and duration (364 days), but not the estimated number of meals or personnel served. If we assume a rough estimate of daily meals served at a large base, the per-meal cost could be calculated. However, without that specific metric, direct comparison is challenging. Generally, per-meal costs in military settings can vary significantly based on location, type of service (e.g., dining hall vs. catered events), and the specific dietary requirements or quality standards mandated. Benchmarking against similar-sized Army posts would be the most relevant comparison.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this food service contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a food service contract of this magnitude typically focus on service quality, food safety, timeliness, and customer satisfaction. Specific KPIs often include adherence to nutritional standards, compliance with health and sanitation regulations (e.g., ServSafe certifications), on-time meal delivery, variety and quality of menu options, and feedback from service members. The contract likely specifies measurable targets for these areas, with potential financial incentives or penalties tied to performance. Regular inspections, customer surveys, and contractor performance reviews are standard mechanisms for monitoring these KPIs.

What is the track record of the contractor (if known) in delivering similar services?

The provided data does not identify the specific contractor awarded this contract, which prevents an assessment of their track record. To evaluate the contractor's reliability, one would typically research their past performance on similar government contracts, particularly those involving large-scale food services for military or institutional clients. This would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, checking for any history of contract disputes, performance failures, or significant commendations. A contractor with a proven history of successful delivery, adherence to quality standards, and effective cost management would be considered a lower risk.

Are there any specific risks associated with the firm-fixed-price contract type for this service?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type generally shifts cost risk to the contractor, which is often beneficial for the government by providing budget certainty. However, for a service like food provision, there are potential risks. If the contractor underestimated costs related to food procurement (e.g., due to market volatility in food prices), labor, or operational expenses, they might struggle to maintain profitability. This could potentially lead to a decline in service quality as the contractor seeks to cut costs, or in extreme cases, contractor default. The government's oversight is crucial to monitor for any signs of performance degradation stemming from cost pressures on the contractor.

What is the potential impact of this contract on small businesses in the local Georgia economy?

While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and doesn't specify a small business set-aside, it can still impact local small businesses. The prime contractor will likely need to procure goods and services, such as food supplies, equipment maintenance, and potentially specialized staffing, from local vendors. If the prime contractor actively seeks out and partners with small businesses in Georgia for these subcontracting opportunities, it can provide a significant boost to the local economy. The extent of this impact depends on the prime's subcontracting plan and the availability of qualified local small businesses.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Accommodation and Food Services › Special Food Services › Food Service Contractors

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W5168W23R0003

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5238 ROYAL WOODS PKWY, TUCKER, GA, 30084

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business, U.S. Regional/State Government

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $77,124,011

Exercised Options: $77,124,011

Current Obligation: $65,867,741

Actual Outlays: $10,600,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W5168W24D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline