EMCOR Government Services awarded $29M for facilities support, highlighting operational efficiency in Virginia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,034,338 ($29.0M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2015-09-30

End Date: 2018-10-31

Contract Duration: 1,127 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES IGF::CT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $29.0 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES IGF::CT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract value indicates a significant investment in maintaining federal facilities. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs and ensure predictable spending. 3. Performance period of over three years suggests a need for sustained operational support. 4. The award to a single contractor implies a focus on specialized capabilities. 5. Geographic concentration in Virginia points to specific facility needs within that region. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 categorizes this as Facilities Support Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $29 million over three years for facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope of maintaining federal facilities. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large-scale facilities management would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests an effort to manage cost predictability for the government. Without specific performance metrics or detailed service breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the duration and scale suggest a substantial operational requirement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of full and open competition generally fosters a more competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The specific number of bidders and the evaluation process details are not provided, but the chosen procurement method suggests a robust selection process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of service providers to participate, ultimately aiming for the best value.

Public Impact

Federal facilities in Virginia benefit from consistent and reliable maintenance and operational support. The services delivered ensure the functionality and safety of government buildings. The geographic impact is concentrated within Virginia, supporting federal operations in that state. The contract supports a workforce involved in facilities management and maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for over-reliance on a single contractor for critical facilities operations.
Scope creep could lead to cost increases if not managed tightly.
Ensuring consistent service quality across the entire performance period requires diligent oversight.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract helps control costs and budget predictability.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
Longer performance period allows for stable operational planning and execution.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, represents a significant segment of the government contracting market. This sector encompasses a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. Federal spending in this area is crucial for ensuring the functionality and security of government assets. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by various federal agencies to understand typical investment levels and pricing structures.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific contract, as the 'ss' (small business set-aside) and 'sb' (small business) flags are false. This suggests the contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses. However, the prime contractor, EMCOR Government Services, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill portions of the contract requirements, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program officials within the Department of State. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Facilities Management Contracts
Department of Defense (DoD) Base Operations Support (BOS)
Public Buildings Service (PBS) Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not clearly defined.
Risk of contractor underperformance impacting facility operations.
Dependency on a single contractor for critical services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $29.0 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES IGF::CT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-09-30. End: 2018-10-31.

What is EMCOR Government Services, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a substantial history of performing federal contracts, with a significant portion focused on facilities operations and maintenance. Their portfolio often includes large-scale contracts for government agencies, demonstrating experience in managing complex requirements. Analyzing their past performance ratings, any contract modifications, and the types of services previously rendered would provide a clearer picture of their capabilities and reliability in this domain. Their consistent award of such contracts suggests a strong performance history, though specific details would require deeper data analysis beyond the provided summary.

How does the $29 million contract value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of State or other agencies?

The $29 million contract value for facilities support services over approximately three years is a substantial award, indicative of a significant operational scope. To benchmark this value, one would compare it against similar contracts for facilities management, maintenance, and operations awarded by the Department of State or other agencies of comparable size and mission. Factors such as the square footage of facilities managed, the range of services provided (e.g., HVAC, electrical, plumbing, janitorial, security), and the geographic locations are critical for a fair comparison. Without these specific details, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a high, low, or average investment, but it signifies a considerable commitment to maintaining federal infrastructure.

What are the primary risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support services?

The primary risks associated with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract for facilities support services revolve around potential scope definition issues and contractor performance. If the scope of work is not precisely defined, the contractor may face unforeseen costs, potentially leading to requests for modifications or a decline in service quality to maintain profitability. Conversely, the government bears the risk if the contractor underperforms or fails to deliver services as specified, as remedies might be limited or costly to enforce. Contractor financial stability and their ability to manage a large, complex operation over the contract's duration are also key risk factors. Diligent government oversight is crucial to mitigate these risks.

What does the 'Facilities Support Services' (NAICS 561210) category typically entail in federal contracting?

The 'Facilities Support Services' category, under NAICS code 561210, encompasses a broad array of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and other physical structures. This typically includes services such as building operation, maintenance, repair, and custodial services. It can also extend to specialized services like grounds maintenance, pest control, and security systems maintenance. Federal agencies utilize these services to ensure their facilities are safe, functional, and well-maintained, supporting their core missions. The scope can vary significantly, from routine upkeep to comprehensive management of complex infrastructure.

What is the significance of the contract being awarded as a 'Delivery Order' (aw: DELIVERY ORDER)?

The designation 'Delivery Order' (aw: DELIVERY ORDER) typically implies that this contract is part of a larger Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar multiple-award contract vehicle. This means that the overarching contract was previously awarded, and this specific delivery order represents a task or order placed against that existing contract. This approach allows agencies to procure services or supplies as needed over a period, often with pre-negotiated terms and pricing. For taxpayers, it can streamline procurement and potentially leverage pre-competed pricing, but it also means the initial competition occurred at the IDIQ level, not for this specific order.

How does the performance period (dur: 1127 days) impact the overall value and risk of this contract?

A performance period of 1127 days, approximately 3.1 years, provides a substantial duration for the contractor to deliver facilities support services. This extended period allows for greater operational stability and the potential for economies of scale, which can contribute to better value over time. It also enables the government to establish a consistent relationship with the contractor, fostering efficiency. However, a longer period also increases the risk of unforeseen changes in requirements, economic fluctuations, or contractor performance degradation. Robust oversight mechanisms are essential to manage these risks throughout the contract's life and ensure continued value delivery.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 2800 CRYSTAL DRIVE, STE 600, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,034,338

Exercised Options: $29,034,338

Current Obligation: $29,034,338

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SAQMMA11D0079

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline