EMCOR Government Services awarded $131.8M for Facilities Support Services to the Department of the Navy

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $131,853,657 ($131.9M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-03-16

End Date: 2011-12-15

Contract Duration: 1,735 days

Daily Burn Rate: $76.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NCR BOS IDIQ

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20374, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $131.9 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: NCR BOS IDIQ Key points: 1. The contract represents a significant investment in maintaining critical facilities for the Department of the Navy. 2. EMCOR Government Services has a substantial contract history with the federal government, indicating established performance. 3. The duration of the contract (over 4 years) suggests a long-term need for these services. 4. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs and provide predictable spending. 5. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 6. Facilities support services are essential for the operational readiness of military installations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award of $131.8 million over its period of performance indicates a substantial commitment to facilities maintenance. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts is challenging without more granular service details. However, the firm-fixed-price nature of the contract suggests an effort to manage costs predictably. The number of bids received (5) in a full and open competition provides some basis for assessing value, though a direct per-unit cost comparison is not feasible with the provided data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Five bids were received, indicating a moderate level of competition for this significant facilities support services contract. A competitive process like this generally helps to ensure that the government receives fair market pricing and that the most capable contractor is selected.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition suggests that taxpayers benefited from a process designed to solicit the best possible price and performance, avoiding potential overpayment associated with less competitive solicitations.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from the reliable provision of essential facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. Personnel working at Navy facilities in the District of Columbia are impacted by the maintenance and upkeep of their work environment. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector, likely benefiting the local workforce in the Washington D.C. area. The services provided are critical for the day-to-day functioning and long-term integrity of Navy installations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs within the firm-fixed-price contract.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities maintenance could pose a risk if performance degrades.
Ensuring consistent quality across all serviced facilities over the contract's duration requires robust oversight.

Positive Signals

The firm-fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
Awarding through full and open competition suggests a thorough vetting of potential contractors.
The long contract duration indicates a stable and predictable service delivery model.

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services represent a broad category within the services sector, encompassing maintenance, repair, operations, and management of physical infrastructure. This contract falls within the broader government contracting market for professional, scientific, and technical services. The total federal spending on facilities maintenance and support services is substantial, with significant portions allocated to defense and civilian agencies to ensure the upkeep of vast real estate portfolios. This specific contract's value is considerable within its niche.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor, EMCOR Government Services, Inc., is a large business. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely limited unless significant subcontracting opportunities are pursued by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

The firm-fixed-price contract structure inherently includes accountability for delivering services within the agreed-upon cost. Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and technical representatives within the Department of the Navy, who monitor performance against contract requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Navy Base Operations Support
Federal Building Operations and Maintenance
Government Facilities Management Contracts
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Long-term contract duration may require careful performance monitoring to ensure sustained quality.
Firm-fixed-price contracts can be susceptible to scope creep if not managed tightly.
Dependence on a single large contractor for critical services warrants strong oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $131.9 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. NCR BOS IDIQ

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $131.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-03-16. End: 2011-12-15.

What is EMCOR Government Services, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a significant history of federal contracting, with this $131.8 million award being one of its larger contracts. The company frequently secures contracts for facilities operations, maintenance, and support services across various government agencies, including the Department of Defense and other civilian departments. Their extensive portfolio suggests a proven capability and experience in managing large-scale government service contracts. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, including any reported issues or successes, would provide further insight into their reliability and effectiveness in delivering these essential services.

How does the $131.8 million award compare to other federal facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy?

The $131.8 million award to EMCOR Government Services, Inc. for facilities support services is a substantial contract, placing it among the larger awards in this category for the Department of the Navy. While specific comparative data requires access to a comprehensive database of all Navy contracts, awards of this magnitude typically cover extensive facility portfolios or long-term, comprehensive service agreements. Contracts of this size often involve a wide range of services, from routine maintenance and repairs to complex system management and upgrades, reflecting a significant operational need and investment by the Navy.

What are the primary risks associated with a long-term, firm-fixed-price facilities support contract?

A primary risk with long-term, firm-fixed-price (FFP) facilities support contracts is the potential for the contractor to face unforeseen cost increases that erode profit margins, potentially leading to reduced service quality or a contractor seeking contract modifications. Conversely, if the contractor significantly underestimates costs, they may cut corners to maintain profitability. For the government, the risk lies in ensuring that the fixed price remains competitive throughout the contract's life and that the scope of work is clearly defined to prevent disputes or the need for costly change orders. Robust performance monitoring and clear contract administration are crucial to mitigate these risks.

What is the typical scope of 'Facilities Support Services' for a federal agency like the Department of the Navy?

Facilities Support Services for an agency like the Department of the Navy typically encompass a broad range of activities necessary for the operation, maintenance, and upkeep of physical infrastructure. This can include routine maintenance (HVAC, plumbing, electrical), janitorial services, groundskeeping, pest control, waste management, minor repairs and renovations, energy management, security system maintenance, and sometimes even space management and relocation services. The specific scope is defined by the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS), which details the exact services required, performance standards, and delivery timelines to ensure installations are safe, functional, and mission-ready.

How does the 'full and open competition' award mechanism impact cost-effectiveness for taxpayers?

The 'full and open competition' award mechanism is designed to maximize cost-effectiveness for taxpayers by encouraging a wide range of potential contractors to bid on a requirement. This broad competition typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the contract, offering their best terms. It also increases the likelihood that the government will select a contractor offering the best value, considering both price and technical approach. In contrast, sole-source or limited competition contracts often result in higher prices due to reduced market pressure, making full and open competition generally more advantageous for taxpayer dollars.

What are the implications of the contract's duration (1735 days) on service continuity and contractor investment?

A contract duration of 1735 days (approximately 4.75 years) provides significant service continuity for the Department of the Navy, ensuring that essential facilities support functions are consistently performed without frequent re-competition. For the contractor, EMCOR Government Services, Inc., this extended period allows for greater investment in specialized equipment, training, and personnel dedicated to the contract, potentially leading to improved efficiency and service quality over time. It also provides a stable revenue stream, enabling more strategic resource allocation and workforce planning. However, it also necessitates robust oversight to ensure performance remains high throughout the entire duration.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 2800 CRYSTAL DRIVE, STE 600, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $131,853,657

Exercised Options: $131,853,657

Current Obligation: $131,853,657

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008007D0374

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline