GSA awards $38.3M for facilities maintenance, with EMCOR Government Services securing the contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $38,293,555 ($38.3M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2011-10-01

End Date: 2015-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,368 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DECA WHOLE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: LACKLAND AFB, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78236

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $38.3 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: DECA WHOLE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining federal facilities. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 4. Contract duration of over three years indicates a long-term need for services. 5. The award falls within the facilities support services sector, a critical area for government operations. 6. Geographic focus on Texas highlights regional infrastructure support.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award of $38.3 million over approximately 3.75 years for facilities maintenance and support services appears reasonable given the scope. While specific per-unit cost benchmarks are not provided, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the expected costs. Comparing this to similar large-scale facilities maintenance contracts across federal agencies would provide further context on value for money, but the duration and comprehensive nature of the services indicate a substantial undertaking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of three bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this significant facilities maintenance contract. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, three offers generally provide a reasonable basis for price discovery and selection.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by encouraging contractors to offer their best pricing and service levels.

Public Impact

Federal facilities in Texas will benefit from consistent and reliable maintenance operations. The contract ensures the continued functionality and upkeep of critical government infrastructure. Support services include a range of maintenance activities essential for building operations. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector in Texas.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen maintenance issues arise beyond the scope of the fixed-price agreement.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facility operations could pose a risk if performance issues emerge.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Award to an established entity like EMCOR Government Services implies experience in handling large-scale contracts.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210, Facilities Support Services, covers establishments primarily engaged in operating and maintaining buildings and other facilities on a contract or fee basis. Spending in this sector is substantial across the federal government, as agencies rely on these services to ensure the safety, functionality, and efficiency of their physical assets. This specific award represents a portion of the overall federal investment in maintaining its real property portfolio.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited, although the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors at their discretion. Further analysis of the contract's detailed terms would be needed to ascertain any specific small business utilization goals or performance.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. As a large federal agency, GSA has established procurement and contract management processes. Oversight would typically involve regular performance reviews, financial monitoring, and adherence to contract terms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases and reporting requirements. The Inspector General of the GSA would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
Public Buildings Service
General Services Administration Operations and Maintenance Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if maintenance needs exceed initial estimates.
Contractor performance risk if service quality degrades over the contract period.
Budgetary risk if unforeseen facility issues require additional, unbudgeted funds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $38.3 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. DECA WHOLE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $38.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-10-01. End: 2015-06-30.

What is EMCOR Government Services' track record with similar federal contracts?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a significant history of performing federal contracts, particularly in the areas of facilities maintenance, operations, and support services. They have been awarded numerous contracts across various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and other civilian agencies. Their experience often involves large-scale, complex projects requiring a broad range of technical and management expertise. Analyzing their past performance ratings, any past performance issues or awards, and the value and duration of previous similar contracts would provide a comprehensive view of their capabilities and reliability in executing federal mandates. This specific contract with GSA builds upon their established presence in serving government clients.

How does the awarded amount compare to historical spending on facilities maintenance by the GSA in Texas?

To assess how the $38.3 million award compares to historical spending, one would need to examine GSA's expenditure data for facilities maintenance services specifically within Texas over previous fiscal years. This would involve querying contract databases for similar services (NAICS 561210) awarded by GSA in that geographic region. A comparison would look at the total dollar value of contracts awarded annually, the number of contracts, and the average contract size. If this $38.3 million award represents a significant increase or decrease compared to historical averages, it could indicate a change in GSA's maintenance strategy, an increase in facility needs, or a more competitive bidding environment. Without access to that granular historical data, a direct comparison is not possible from the provided information.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this facilities maintenance contract?

While the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are not detailed in the summary data, federal facilities maintenance contracts typically include metrics focused on service availability, response times for maintenance requests, preventative maintenance completion rates, energy efficiency targets, safety compliance, and overall facility condition assessments. Performance is often evaluated against established service level agreements (SLAs). For this contract, GSA would likely monitor KPIs related to the timely and effective execution of maintenance tasks, adherence to safety protocols, and the overall operational readiness of the facilities managed by EMCOR Government Services. Regular performance reviews would assess the contractor's ability to meet these defined objectives.

What is the potential risk associated with the fixed-price contract type for this scope of work?

The primary risk associated with a fixed-price contract type for facilities maintenance is the potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise that are not adequately covered by the contract's scope or contingencies. While fixed-price contracts offer budget certainty to the government, they place the risk of cost escalation on the contractor. If the contractor underestimates the complexity, labor, or material costs required to perform the services, they may incur losses. Conversely, if the contractor is highly efficient and manages costs effectively, they can achieve higher profit margins. For the government, the risk is that the contractor may cut corners on service quality to maintain profitability if the fixed price proves insufficient for the actual work required, necessitating close oversight.

How does the competition level (3 bidders) impact the value for money achieved in this contract?

A competition level with three bidders generally suggests a moderate degree of market interest and a reasonable opportunity for price discovery. While more bidders could potentially lead to lower prices due to increased competitive pressure, three offers typically provide enough choice to avoid a situation where the government is forced to accept a non-competitive price. The value for money is influenced by whether these three bidders were highly qualified and submitted competitive proposals. If the proposals were well-defined and the pricing reflected market rates for the services offered, then good value for money can be achieved. However, a deeper analysis of the bid prices relative to independent cost estimates or market benchmarks would be necessary to definitively assess the value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 12RT0030

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 2800 CRYSTAL DRIVE, STE 600, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,634,975

Exercised Options: $38,293,555

Current Obligation: $38,293,555

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS08T10BPC0174

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline