DOE/NNSA's $87.5M IT Support Contract Awarded to INTEPROS FEDERAL INC. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $87,489,931 ($87.5M)
Contractor: Intepros Federal Incorporated
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2017-08-01
End Date: 2023-01-31
Contract Duration: 2,009 days
Daily Burn Rate: $43.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (DOE/NNSA) OFFICE OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $87.5 million to INTEPROS FEDERAL INCORPORATED for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (DOE/NNSA) OFFICE OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract provides essential IT support services to the NNSA's OCIO. 2. Awarded through a BPA Call under a full and open competition. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests predictable costs for the government. 4. Contract duration spans from August 2017 to January 2023. 5. The contract's value of $87.5M over its term indicates significant IT investment. 6. Geographic location is Washington D.C., a hub for federal IT services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of $87.5M over approximately 5.5 years for IT support services appears reasonable given the scope of supporting a major federal agency like the NNSA. Without specific performance metrics or detailed breakdowns of services rendered, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price structure generally aids in cost control. Benchmarking against similar IT support contracts for agencies of comparable size and complexity would provide further insight into whether the pricing is competitive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The fact that it was a BPA Call suggests it was likely a competitive task order against an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. The number of bidders (3) is on the lower side for a full and open competition, which could warrant further investigation into the solicitation process and market reach.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and service quality. However, with only three bidders, the potential for significant price discovery might have been limited compared to a more robustly contested procurement.
Public Impact
Federal employees within the DOE/NNSA OCIO benefit from reliable IT infrastructure and support. Services delivered include computer facilities management, ensuring operational continuity. The geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia. Workforce implications include the employment of IT professionals by INTEPROS FEDERAL INC.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited number of bidders (3) in a full and open competition may indicate potential barriers to entry or insufficient market outreach.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to fully assess the value delivered for the $87.5M spent.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition generally promotes a fair and competitive marketplace.
- The contract supports critical IT functions for a national security agency.
Sector Analysis
Information Technology (IT) support services are a critical component of federal agency operations. The market for these services is vast and competitive, encompassing a wide range of capabilities from infrastructure management to cybersecurity. This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on computer facilities management. Comparable spending benchmarks for IT support contracts within federal agencies of similar size and mission scope would be necessary for a more precise comparison.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary contractor, INTEPROS FEDERAL INC., is likely a mid-to-large sized business, and the contract's value suggests it is a significant award. Analysis of subcontracting plans, if any, would be needed to understand the broader impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Department of Energy's Inspector General (IG) and the contracting officers within the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS-NG, where award details are publicly available. Accountability rests with the contractor to deliver services as specified and with the agency to monitor performance and compliance.
Related Government Programs
- IT Support Services
- Computer Facilities Management Services
- Department of Energy IT Contracts
- National Nuclear Security Administration Contracts
- Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Risk Flags
- Limited Competition (3 bidders)
- Potential for cost growth if scope is not well-defined (despite FFP)
- Cybersecurity risks inherent in IT support contracts
Tags
it-services, computer-facilities-management, department-of-energy, national-nuclear-security-administration, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, bpa-call, district-of-columbia, large-contract, it-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $87.5 million to INTEPROS FEDERAL INCORPORATED. IGF::CL::IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (DOE/NNSA) OFFICE OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INTEPROS FEDERAL INCORPORATED.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $87.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-08-01. End: 2023-01-31.
What is the track record of INTEPROS FEDERAL INC. in performing similar IT support contracts for federal agencies?
Assessing INTEPROS FEDERAL INC.'s track record requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving IT support and computer facilities management. Information on contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any past issues or successes would be crucial. A history of successful, on-time, and within-budget performance on comparable contracts would indicate a lower risk for this current award. Conversely, a history of performance issues, disputes, or contract terminations would raise concerns. Without specific past performance data readily available in this summary, further investigation into the contractor's federal contract history is recommended.
How does the $87.5M contract value compare to similar IT support contracts awarded by the DOE/NNSA or other federal agencies of comparable size?
Benchmarking the $87.5M contract value requires comparing it against IT support contracts for agencies with similar missions, size, and complexity. For instance, comparing it to IT support contracts for other Department of Energy offices, or agencies like the Department of Defense or Department of Justice with large IT infrastructures, would provide context. The duration of the contract (approx. 5.5 years) is also a factor; an annual spend of roughly $16M ($87.5M / 5.5 years) needs to be evaluated. If similar agencies are awarding contracts in the $10M-$20M annual range for comparable services, then this contract appears to be within a reasonable market range. A higher or lower value could indicate either exceptional value or potential over/underpricing.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks for this IT support contract include potential performance failures (e.g., system downtime, inadequate user support), cost overruns (though mitigated by FFP), cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and contractor personnel issues (e.g., turnover, lack of qualified staff). Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by the agency, clearly defined performance standards and Service Level Agreements (SLAs), regular performance reviews, and adherence to cybersecurity protocols. The firm fixed-price structure inherently mitigates financial risk for the government regarding scope changes, assuming the scope is well-defined. The limited number of bidders (3) could also be a risk if it suggests a lack of market competition, potentially impacting future pricing or innovation.
How effective has INTEPROS FEDERAL INC. been in delivering Computer Facilities Management Services based on past performance?
Evaluating the effectiveness of INTEPROS FEDERAL INC. in delivering Computer Facilities Management Services requires access to their past performance records, such as CPARS reports. These reports provide agency assessments of contractor performance across various metrics like technical quality, cost control, schedule adherence, management, and customer satisfaction. If available, positive CPARS ratings would indicate effective service delivery. Conversely, negative ratings or documented issues would suggest potential effectiveness concerns. Without direct access to these performance evaluations, it's difficult to definitively assess their effectiveness. However, the renewal or continuation of contracts, as implied by the award, often suggests a baseline level of satisfactory performance.
What are the historical spending patterns for IT support services within the DOE/NNSA OCIO, and how does this contract fit within that trend?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for IT support services within the DOE/NNSA OCIO would involve examining contract awards over several fiscal years. This includes looking at the total amount spent annually on IT support, the types of services procured, and the primary contractors utilized. This $87.5M contract, spanning from 2017 to 2023, represents a significant investment over that period. Understanding if this level of spending is consistent with, higher than, or lower than previous years' spending on similar services would indicate whether this contract represents a stable, increasing, or decreasing trend in IT support investment for the OCIO. It also helps contextualize the contract's importance and scale within the agency's overall IT budget.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 475 SCHOOL ST SW STE 1200, WASHINGTON, DC, 20024
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $89,493,696
Exercised Options: $89,493,696
Current Obligation: $87,489,931
Actual Outlays: $42,637,076
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DENA0002611
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-08-01
Current End Date: 2023-01-31
Potential End Date: 2023-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-02-15
More Contracts from Intepros Federal Incorporated
- THE Mission of the Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (nnsa) Associate Administrator for Information Management and Chief Information Officer (ocio) IS to Effectively Execute and Govern the Complex, Dynamic Program O — $50.3M (Department of Energy)
- Eoir EA and PMO Services Base Period Incrementally Funded — $31.1M (Department of Justice)
- Enterprise Project Management, Engineering, Application Development and Operational Support — $11.4M (Department of Justice)
- Ustp FY24 Itss5 Legacy Operations — $6.3M (Department of Justice)
- Office of Water Information Technology Support Services the Services for This Task Order ARE in Accordance With the GSA MAS RFQ NO. 1665218, and the Intepros Federal Proposal Dated MAY 30, 2024 — $5.7M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)