DOE's $50.3M IT services contract awarded to Intepros Federal Inc. for custom computer programming
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $50,305,116 ($50.3M)
Contractor: Intepros Federal Incorporated
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2023-02-01
End Date: 2025-02-28
Contract Duration: 758 days
Daily Burn Rate: $66.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: THE MISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NNSA) ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) IS TO EFFECTIVELY EXECUTE AND GOVERN THE COMPLEX, DYNAMIC PROGRAM O
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $50.3 million to INTEPROS FEDERAL INCORPORATED for work described as: THE MISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NNSA) ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) IS TO EFFECTIVELY EXECUTE AND GOVERN THE COMPLEX, DYNAMIC PROGRAM O Key points: 1. The contract value of $50.3 million over its period of performance suggests a significant investment in IT services. 2. The 'Custom Computer Programming Services' NAICS code indicates a focus on specialized software development and IT solutions. 3. A single award for this amount warrants scrutiny regarding the competitive landscape and potential for cost efficiencies. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government, shifting performance risk to the contractor. 5. The contract duration of approximately 758 days (2 years) allows for sustained support but requires ongoing performance monitoring. 6. The award to Intepros Federal Inc. represents a substantial commitment to a single vendor for critical IT functions.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $50.3 million for custom computer programming services over two years appears substantial. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale IT development contracts within the federal government would be necessary to definitively assess value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to control costs, but the absence of detailed performance metrics or comparison data makes a precise value assessment challenging. Without more granular data on the specific services rendered and their impact, it's difficult to ascertain if this represents an optimal use of taxpayer funds compared to alternative solutions or contractors.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. However, the fact that only one award was made suggests that either Intepros Federal Inc. was the sole responsive and responsible bidder, or it significantly outperformed all other submissions. The level of competition, while initially broad, resulted in a single award, which can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing than a scenario with multiple strong contenders vying for the contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it theoretically drives down prices through market forces. However, a single award from such a competition might indicate that the market for these specific services is limited, or that the government's requirements were highly specialized, potentially limiting the number of capable bidders.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy (DOE) and its National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) are the primary beneficiaries, receiving essential IT services. The contract supports the effective execution and governance of complex, dynamic programs within the DOE/NNSA's Information Management and CIO offices. Services delivered likely include custom software development, system integration, and IT support crucial for national security missions. The contract's impact is concentrated within the District of Columbia, where the DOE/NNSA headquarters are located. The contract supports the federal IT workforce, potentially through direct employment by Intepros Federal Inc. or its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in given the significant investment and duration.
- Risk of cost overruns if the scope of 'custom programming' expands beyond initial estimates.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical IT functions could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a potentially competitive bidding process.
- Contract duration allows for sustained support and development of specialized IT capabilities.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically custom computer programming services. The federal IT services market is vast and highly competitive, with significant spending allocated annually to software development, system maintenance, and IT consulting. The DOE/NNSA's need for specialized programming aligns with a broader government trend of outsourcing complex IT functions to specialized firms. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found in IT services contracts awarded by other large federal agencies for similar custom development work.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits for the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award. The focus appears to be on securing the required custom programming services from the most capable vendor, regardless of size, through full and open competition.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers responsible for the OCIO. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to meet performance standards within the agreed-upon price. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy IT Modernization Programs
- National Nuclear Security Administration Cybersecurity Initiatives
- Federal Custom Software Development Contracts
- IT Services for National Security Agencies
- Custom Computer Programming Services (NAICS 541511) Federal Spending
Risk Flags
- Single award from full and open competition warrants further investigation into bidder pool.
- Contract value is substantial, requiring close monitoring of performance and cost.
- Firm-fixed-price contract shifts risk but requires clear definition of scope to avoid disputes.
Tags
it, department-of-energy, national-nuclear-security-administration, custom-computer-programming, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, intepros-federal-inc, district-of-columbia, it-services, software-development
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $50.3 million to INTEPROS FEDERAL INCORPORATED. THE MISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NNSA) ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) IS TO EFFECTIVELY EXECUTE AND GOVERN THE COMPLEX, DYNAMIC PROGRAM O
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INTEPROS FEDERAL INCORPORATED.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $50.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-02-01. End: 2025-02-28.
What is the specific nature of the 'complex, dynamic program' that Intepros Federal Inc. is supporting for the DOE/NNSA OCIO?
The provided data indicates the mission of the DOE/NNSA Associate Administrator for Information Management and Chief Information Officer (OCIO) is to 'effectively execute and govern the complex, dynamic program'. While the exact nature of this program is not detailed, it broadly refers to the overarching IT strategy, operations, and management responsibilities within the NNSA. This likely encompasses areas such as cybersecurity, data management, IT infrastructure, enterprise resource planning systems, and the development or maintenance of specialized software critical to the NNSA's national security mission. The 'dynamic' aspect suggests evolving technological landscapes and mission requirements that necessitate adaptable IT solutions.
How does the $50.3 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar custom computer programming services by the DOE/NNSA?
Without access to historical spending data specific to the DOE/NNSA for custom computer programming services (NAICS 541511), a direct comparison is not possible. However, $50.3 million over two years represents a significant investment, averaging over $25 million annually. This figure suggests a substantial need for specialized IT development. To provide a meaningful comparison, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded by the DOE/NNSA for similar services, looking at contract values, durations, and the scope of work. This would help determine if current spending is in line with historical trends, increasing, or decreasing.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this firm-fixed-price contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) for this contract. In a firm-fixed-price contract, the government typically outlines specific deliverables, quality standards, and timelines that the contractor must meet. While the contract type aims to fix the price, performance is still critical. KPIs and SLAs would likely cover aspects such as software functionality, bug resolution times, system uptime, project completion milestones, and adherence to security protocols. These would be detailed in the contract's statement of work and performance requirements documents.
What is Intepros Federal Inc.'s track record with the Department of Energy or similar federal agencies for custom programming services?
The provided data identifies Intepros Federal Inc. as the awardee but does not offer details on their specific track record with the Department of Energy (DOE) or other federal agencies. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes. Federal procurement systems often contain past performance information, which would be crucial for understanding Intepros Federal Inc.'s reliability, quality of work, and ability to manage complex IT projects within budget and schedule constraints for government clients.
Given the 'full and open competition' resulted in a single award, does this suggest a lack of market interest or a highly specialized requirement?
A single award resulting from 'full and open competition' can indicate several possibilities. It might suggest that the government's requirements were highly specialized, and only Intepros Federal Inc. possessed the unique capabilities, experience, or proposed solution that met all criteria. Alternatively, it could imply that while multiple entities were eligible to bid, only one submitted a proposal deemed technically acceptable and cost-effective by the government. It might also reflect a competitive landscape where only a few firms are capable of undertaking projects of this magnitude and complexity, and Intepros Federal Inc. was the strongest contender among them.
What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single vendor for critical IT services over a two-year period?
Relying on a single vendor for critical IT services over a two-year period carries several potential risks. These include vendor lock-in, where the government becomes heavily dependent on the contractor's proprietary systems or knowledge, making transitions difficult and costly. There's also the risk of performance degradation if the contractor faces internal challenges, resource constraints, or a decline in motivation once the competitive pressure is reduced. Furthermore, if the contractor fails to deliver or faces financial instability, it could significantly disrupt essential government operations. Ensuring robust contract management, clear performance expectations, and contingency planning are crucial mitigation strategies.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 400 5TH AVE STE 340, WALTHAM, MA, 02451
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $50,358,065
Exercised Options: $50,358,065
Current Obligation: $50,305,116
Actual Outlays: $50,305,116
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QTCA19D00H4
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-02-01
Current End Date: 2025-02-28
Potential End Date: 2025-09-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-17
More Contracts from Intepros Federal Incorporated
- U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (doe/Nnsa) Office of Information Management and Chief Information Officer (ocio) Information Technology Support Services — $87.5M (Department of Energy)
- Eoir EA and PMO Services Base Period Incrementally Funded — $31.1M (Department of Justice)
- Enterprise Project Management, Engineering, Application Development and Operational Support — $11.4M (Department of Justice)
- Ustp FY24 Itss5 Legacy Operations — $6.3M (Department of Justice)
- Office of Water Information Technology Support Services the Services for This Task Order ARE in Accordance With the GSA MAS RFQ NO. 1665218, and the Intepros Federal Proposal Dated MAY 30, 2024 — $5.7M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)