DOE/NNSA awards $4.1M contract for project management support to Vector Resource Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,103,126 ($4.1M)

Contractor: Vector Resource Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2023-04-19

End Date: 2026-04-18

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: INDEPENDENT PROJECT REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT SUPPORT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE PROJECT MANAGEMENT (NA-APM-20)

Place of Performance

Location: ENGLEWOOD, SARASOTA County, FLORIDA, 34223

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $4.1 million to VECTOR RESOURCE INC for work described as: INDEPENDENT PROJECT REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT SUPPORT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE PROJECT MANAGEMENT (NA-APM-20) Key points: 1. Contract focuses on administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Awarded via a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a pre-competed framework. 3. Time and Materials contract type carries inherent risk of cost overruns. 4. Performance period spans three years, from April 2023 to April 2026. 5. Contractor, Vector Resource Inc., is based in Florida. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $4.1 million over three years for administrative and management consulting services appears moderate for a federal agency like the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting is challenging without more specific service details. However, the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, while common, can lead to higher costs if not closely managed, as it doesn't cap labor hours. The award amount of $3,747 for the base period suggests a relatively small initial task order, with the total value representing the ceiling for the contract duration.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The use of a BPA Call indicates that the underlying framework agreement was previously competed, and this award is a call against that established agreement. The specific number of bidders for this particular call is not provided, but the full and open nature generally promotes a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition provides taxpayers with assurance that the government sought the best value from a wide range of potential providers, potentially leading to more cost-effective services.

Public Impact

The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) will benefit from enhanced project management support. Services delivered will likely include strategic planning, program oversight, and administrative support for enterprise projects. The geographic impact is primarily within the NNSA's operational areas, likely concentrated in Florida where the contractor is based. Workforce implications may involve the utilization of specialized consulting expertise to augment NNSA's internal capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in project management, strategic planning, and operational efficiency. The NNSA's need for such support is typical for large, complex organizations managing significant projects.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This means that both large and small businesses were eligible to compete. While there is no direct subcontracting requirement specified, the absence of a small business set-aside suggests that opportunities for small businesses may be limited unless they are prime contractors on other vehicles or are subcontracting to the prime awardee, Vector Resource Inc.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the DOE/NNSA. The Time and Materials nature of the contract necessitates close monitoring of labor hours and costs to ensure adherence to the contract ceiling and prevent overspending. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases and reporting requirements, although specific oversight mechanisms for this particular BPA call are not detailed in the provided data.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-energy, national-nuclear-security-administration, consulting-services, project-management, administrative-support, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, florida, bpa-call, management-consulting

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $4.1 million to VECTOR RESOURCE INC. INDEPENDENT PROJECT REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT SUPPORT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION'S (DOE/NNSA) OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE PROJECT MANAGEMENT (NA-APM-20)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VECTOR RESOURCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-04-19. End: 2026-04-18.

What is the track record of Vector Resource Inc. in performing similar federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Energy or NNSA?

Assessing the track record of Vector Resource Inc. requires accessing historical contract data beyond this single award. Federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS can provide insights into past performance, contract values, agencies served, and any reported performance issues or awards. Without this specific data, it's difficult to definitively evaluate their past performance. However, securing a contract with the NNSA suggests they have met certain baseline requirements for capability and responsibility. Further investigation into past performance reviews and any past performance questionnaires (PPQs) associated with their previous federal awards would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment.

How does the awarded amount compare to typical federal spending on similar project management consulting services?

The awarded ceiling of $4.1 million over three years for project management consulting services is within a common range for federal contracts of this nature. However, 'typical' spending can vary significantly based on the scope, complexity, and duration of services required. For specialized support within agencies like the NNSA, which deals with complex national security missions, such a value is not unusual. Benchmarking would ideally involve comparing this contract to others providing similar administrative and general management consulting to defense or energy sector agencies. The Time and Materials (T&M) nature means the actual spend could be less than the ceiling if fewer hours are utilized, or potentially more if the ceiling is increased via modification.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for project management support, and how might they be mitigated?

The primary risk with a T&M contract is the potential for cost overruns, as the contractor is reimbursed for direct labor hours at specified rates and for materials. Unlike fixed-price contracts, there is less incentive for the contractor to control costs or improve efficiency beyond what is necessary to fulfill the contract. For project management support, this could mean extended timelines or higher-than-expected labor hours billed. Mitigation strategies include robust government oversight, clearly defined task orders with estimated hours, regular reviews of timesheets and invoices, and strong communication channels to ensure alignment on project goals and scope. Setting a clear ceiling and exercising strict change control are also crucial.

What specific project management methodologies or frameworks is Vector Resource Inc. expected to employ under this contract?

The provided contract details do not specify the exact project management methodologies or frameworks that Vector Resource Inc. is expected to employ. Typically, such requirements would be detailed in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) attached to the contract. Federal agencies often utilize frameworks like the Project Management Institute's (PMI) Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), Agile methodologies, or specific government program management standards. The NNSA, dealing with complex and often sensitive projects, likely requires adherence to rigorous standards. The contractor's proposal and subsequent discussions during the procurement process would have outlined their approach.

How has federal spending on administrative and general management consulting services trended over the past five years, and does this contract align with that trend?

Federal spending on administrative and general management consulting services has generally remained robust over the past five years, driven by the government's need for specialized expertise to manage complex programs, improve efficiency, and adapt to evolving technological and policy landscapes. Agencies across various sectors, including defense, energy, and health, frequently contract for these services. This $4.1 million award to the NNSA aligns with this trend, reflecting the ongoing reliance on external consultants for strategic planning, program oversight, and operational support. The specific amount is moderate and consistent with many individual task orders or smaller contracts within this broad category of federal spending.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 89233123QNA000282

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 417 STATE ST, ERIE, PA, 16501

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,025,489

Exercised Options: $6,181,110

Current Obligation: $4,103,126

Actual Outlays: $2,373,939

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 89233122ANA000018

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-04-19

Current End Date: 2026-04-18

Potential End Date: 2026-04-18 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-19

More Contracts from Vector Resource Inc

View all Vector Resource Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending