NASA awards $146,650 contract for market research on potential new headquarters location

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $146,650 ($146.7K)

Contractor: Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.

Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-05-23

Contract Duration: 45 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM AND DELIVER A MARKET RESEARCH ANALYSIS REPORT TO IDENTIFY AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS PROPERTIES FOR LEASE AND/OR SALE FOR A POTENTIAL FUTURE NASA HEADQUARTERS LOCATION.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20006

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $146,650.11 to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM AND DELIVER A MARKET RESEARCH ANALYSIS REPORT TO IDENTIFY AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS PROPERTIES FOR LEASE AND/OR SALE FOR A POTENTIAL FUTURE NASA HEADQUARTERS LOCATION. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on identifying commercial properties for lease or sale. 2. Analysis aims to support future NASA Headquarters location decisions. 3. The contract duration is 45 days, indicating a focused research effort. 4. The award was made under full and open competition. 5. The contractor, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., is a recognized real estate services firm. 6. The contract value is relatively small for a strategic real estate analysis.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $146,650 for a market research analysis appears reasonable given the scope of identifying potential commercial properties for a major federal agency's headquarters. Benchmarking against similar real estate market studies for large organizations suggests this price point is within expected ranges for specialized consulting services. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract helps control costs for this defined scope of work.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This competitive process is expected to yield a fair price and ensure the selection of a capable contractor. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the method of competition suggests a robust selection process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and encourages innovation, leading to better value for public funds.

Public Impact

NASA benefits from expert analysis to inform a critical strategic decision regarding its headquarters. The public benefits from efficient government operations and potentially improved accessibility or functionality of NASA's future headquarters. The primary geographic impact is within the District of Columbia, where the current headquarters is located and potential new sites may be considered. The contract supports the administrative and strategic planning functions of a key federal agency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. The market for real estate advisory and market research services is substantial, with many firms offering specialized expertise. NASA's need for this analysis is driven by strategic planning for its physical infrastructure, a common requirement for large organizations, though the specific focus on headquarters location is unique to agency needs.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., a large business. There is no indication of a small business set-aside for this particular contract. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly detailed but could potentially arise if the prime contractor engages specialized local market research firms or data providers.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will be provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officer and potentially program managers responsible for strategic planning. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by limiting the total expenditure. Transparency is maintained through the federal procurement process, with contract awards generally being publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

professional-services, real-estate-advisory, market-research, nasa, district-of-columbia, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, administrative-management, consulting-services, strategic-planning, commercial-properties

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $146,650.11 to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM AND DELIVER A MARKET RESEARCH ANALYSIS REPORT TO IDENTIFY AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS PROPERTIES FOR LEASE AND/OR SALE FOR A POTENTIAL FUTURE NASA HEADQUARTERS LOCATION.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $146,650.11.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-05-23.

What is the track record of Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. in performing similar market research for federal agencies?

Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. (JLL) is a global real estate services firm with extensive experience in commercial real estate advisory, including market research, site selection, and transaction services. While specific details on past federal contracts for market research reports on headquarters locations are not immediately available in this context, JLL has a significant history of working with government entities on various real estate needs. Their broad expertise in commercial property markets, leasing, and sales across major metropolitan areas, including Washington D.C., positions them well to conduct such an analysis. Federal agencies often leverage large, established real estate service providers like JLL for their market intelligence and strategic planning due to their reach, data resources, and established methodologies. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases would likely reveal numerous past performance instances, though the exact nature of 'headquarters location market research' would need to be verified.

How does the $146,650 contract value compare to similar market research analyses for large organizational relocations or consolidations?

The contract value of $146,650 for a market research analysis report to identify available commercial properties for a potential NASA Headquarters location appears to be on the lower end for a comprehensive study of this magnitude, especially considering the strategic importance and potential scale of a headquarters relocation. Typical market studies for large corporate headquarters or major government facility consolidations can range from several hundred thousand to over a million dollars, depending on the geographic scope, depth of analysis required, and the complexity of the real estate market. This contract's relatively modest value, coupled with a short 45-day performance period, suggests a focused scope, perhaps concentrating on initial identification of broad market availability rather than in-depth site-specific due diligence or detailed financial modeling. It may represent an initial phase of a larger real estate strategy.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include the potential for the market research to be too narrow in scope given the short 45-day duration, leading to incomplete identification of suitable properties. Another risk is that the analysis might not fully capture the nuances of the specific requirements for a federal headquarters, such as security, accessibility, and long-term operational needs. Furthermore, the findings are advisory; the ultimate decision-making process for a new headquarters location involves many factors beyond market availability. Mitigation strategies likely include a clearly defined statement of work that specifies the expected deliverables and the depth of analysis required. The use of a reputable contractor like Jones Lang LaSalle, with proven expertise in commercial real estate, also mitigates performance risk. The firm fixed-price contract structure mitigates cost overrun risk for NASA.

What is the expected effectiveness of this market research in informing NASA's decision on a new headquarters location?

The effectiveness of this market research will largely depend on the clarity and specificity of the requirements provided to the contractor and the thoroughness of the analysis conducted within the 45-day timeframe. If the research successfully identifies a diverse range of viable commercial properties that meet NASA's preliminary criteria for lease or sale, it will serve as a valuable foundational step. It can help NASA understand the current market landscape, potential costs, and availability of suitable spaces in the target geographic areas. However, this report is likely just one component of a much larger decision-making process. Its effectiveness in *informing* the decision is high, assuming quality execution, but its effectiveness in *determining* the final location is limited, as it precedes detailed site evaluations, environmental reviews, and policy considerations.

How does this contract align with NASA's historical spending on facilities and administrative services?

This contract represents a small fraction of NASA's overall budget, which historically includes significant spending on research and development, space exploration missions, and aeronautics. Spending on facilities management, administrative services, and strategic planning, while essential, typically constitutes a smaller portion of the agency's total outlays. The $146,650 allocated for this specific market research is consistent with the scale of spending often seen for specialized consulting engagements aimed at informing strategic decisions rather than executing large-scale infrastructure projects. It aligns with the agency's need for expert advice to manage its physical footprint efficiently and plan for future operational needs, supporting its core mission objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2020 K ST NW STE 1100, WASHINGTON, DC, 20006

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $146,650

Exercised Options: $146,650

Current Obligation: $146,650

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 80HQTR22AA002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-08

Current End Date: 2026-05-23

Potential End Date: 2026-05-23 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-08

More Contracts from Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.

View all Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc. federal contracts →

Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts

View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending