GSA awards $33.4M facilities maintenance contract in Georgia, highlighting competition and service scope

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,441,669 ($33.4M)

Contractor: Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2024-09-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $45.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROJECT AND LOCATION: COMPLETE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES, VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA NORTH. AWARD OF BASE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 9/1/2024 - 8/31/2025.

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30303

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $33.4 million to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. for work described as: PROJECT AND LOCATION: COMPLETE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES, VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA NORTH. AWARD OF BASE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 9/1/2024 - 8/31/2025. Key points: 1. The contract covers comprehensive facilities maintenance across multiple Georgia locations, indicating a broad service requirement. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust market response and potential for competitive pricing. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts performance risk to the contractor, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. 4. The duration of the base period is one year, with potential for extensions. 5. This award falls under the Facilities Support Services NAICS code, a common area for government contracting. 6. The contract value of $33.4 million for the base year represents a significant investment in maintaining federal properties.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $33.4 million for a one-year base period for facilities maintenance services across various locations in Georgia appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities maintenance contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price contract type is standard for services where requirements are well-defined, which helps control costs for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method of procurement generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality for the government. The agency likely sought to maximize the pool of potential offerors to ensure the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of service providers to compete, potentially driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

Federal agencies operating in Georgia will benefit from the continuity and quality of facilities maintenance services. The contract ensures the upkeep and operational readiness of federal buildings across the state. Geographic impact is statewide within Georgia, covering multiple unspecified locations. The contract supports jobs within the facilities maintenance sector, likely benefiting local workforces in Georgia.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, leading to cost overruns beyond the base period.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities maintenance could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Ensuring consistent service quality across all 'various locations' may present logistical challenges.

Positive Signals

Award through full and open competition suggests a competitive process that should yield good value.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contractor, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., is a large, established entity with significant experience in facilities management.

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services, encompassing building operations, maintenance, and repair, is a substantial segment of the government contracting market. This contract falls within the broader commercial real estate services industry. GSA's Public Buildings Service manages a vast portfolio of federal buildings, and contracts like this are essential for their upkeep. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be assessed based on square footage maintained, types of services provided, and geographic density.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would be a positive development for the small business ecosystem if such opportunities are pursued.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. Mechanisms would include contract performance monitoring, regular reporting requirements from the contractor, and potentially site inspections. Accountability is enforced through the firm-fixed-price contract terms, allowing for remedies in case of non-performance. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's public contract databases, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Buildings Fund
Public Buildings Operations
Facilities Management Services
Government Property Management

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues due to geographic dispersion
Contract value may require significant oversight to ensure value for money
Lack of specific bidder numbers limits assessment of competitive intensity

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $33.4 million to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.. PROJECT AND LOCATION: COMPLETE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES, VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA NORTH. AWARD OF BASE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 9/1/2024 - 8/31/2025.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the track record of Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. in performing similar federal facilities maintenance contracts?

Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. (JLL) is a major global real estate services firm with extensive experience in facilities management for both public and private sector clients. While specific details on their past federal facilities maintenance contracts are not provided in this data snippet, JLL has a well-established reputation and a broad portfolio of services that include building operations, maintenance, and integrated facility solutions. Government agencies often award contracts to large, experienced firms like JLL due to their capacity, resources, and established processes. A deeper dive into JLL's contract history with GSA and other federal agencies, including performance ratings and any past disputes or issues, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their track record for this specific type of work.

How does the awarded amount of $33.4 million compare to historical spending on facilities maintenance by GSA in Georgia?

Without historical spending data specific to GSA facilities maintenance in Georgia, a direct comparison is challenging. However, $33.4 million for a one-year base period for comprehensive facilities maintenance across various locations suggests a significant contract. GSA manages a large inventory of federal buildings, and maintenance costs can vary widely based on the age, size, and complexity of the facilities. To benchmark this award, one would need to analyze GSA's historical spending patterns for similar service contracts in the region, considering factors like the number of buildings covered, square footage, and the scope of services (e.g., HVAC, janitorial, groundskeeping, minor repairs). The 'br' value of 45873, potentially representing a benchmark or budget figure, might offer a clue, but its exact meaning requires further clarification.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to measure the success of this contract?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) for a facilities maintenance contract typically focus on service delivery, responsiveness, and cost control. For this contract, common KPIs would likely include response times for emergency and routine maintenance requests, completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance, adherence to safety standards, energy efficiency targets, and customer satisfaction scores from building occupants. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that meeting these KPIs is crucial for the contractor to achieve profitability. GSA's contract administration team would monitor these KPIs through regular reports, site visits, and potentially through a government-wide performance management system. Failure to meet critical KPIs could result in penalties or affect future contract renewals.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the local small business ecosystem in Georgia?

Since this contract was awarded under full and open competition and is not a small business set-aside, there is no direct mandate for the prime contractor, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., to subcontract a specific percentage of the work to small businesses. However, large prime contractors often utilize small businesses for specialized services or to fulfill geographic coverage needs. The extent of the impact on the local small business ecosystem will depend on JLL's subcontracting strategy. If JLL actively seeks out and partners with qualified local small businesses for services such as specialized repairs, landscaping, or cleaning, it could provide significant opportunities. Conversely, if JLL performs most services in-house or with larger, non-local subcontractors, the direct impact on Georgia's small business community might be limited.

Are there any specific risks associated with the 'various locations throughout the state of Georgia' aspect of this contract?

Managing facilities maintenance across 'various locations' presents several inherent risks. Firstly, logistical challenges in coordinating services, personnel, and equipment across a wide geographic area can increase operational complexity and costs. Ensuring consistent service quality and response times at remote or dispersed sites can be difficult. Secondly, understanding and complying with potentially different local regulations or site-specific requirements at each location adds another layer of complexity. Thirdly, the risk of unforeseen issues at any given location, such as emergencies or equipment failures, requires a robust and responsive support structure. The contractor must have a well-defined plan for site assessment, resource allocation, and communication to effectively mitigate these risks and ensure seamless service delivery statewide.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 200 E RANDOLPH ST, CHICAGO, IL, 60601

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $187,477,423

Exercised Options: $33,441,669

Current Obligation: $33,441,669

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PN0424A0002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline