NIH awards $1.97M contract for acquisition transformation support to Jefferson Consulting Group
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $196,576 ($196.6K)
Contractor: Jefferson Consulting Group LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Start Date: 2026-04-03
End Date: 2027-04-02
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $540/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OALM ACQUISITION TRANSFORMATION AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT NIH ACQUISITION CENTRALIZATION INITIATIVE
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20006
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Health and Human Services obligated $196,576 to JEFFERSON CONSULTING GROUP LLC for work described as: OALM ACQUISITION TRANSFORMATION AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT NIH ACQUISITION CENTRALIZATION INITIATIVE Key points: 1. Contract aims to centralize NIH acquisition processes, potentially improving efficiency and standardization. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract structure incentivizes cost control by the contractor. 3. A single award for this duration suggests a focus on specialized expertise. 4. The contract's performance period aligns with ongoing federal efforts to modernize procurement. 5. This award falls within the broad professional, scientific, and technical services category.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $1.97 million over one year appears reasonable for specialized acquisition transformation support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting and acquisition support services indicates that this price point is within the expected range for a single-award, firm-fixed-price contract of this scope. The fixed-price nature helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government, provided the scope is well-defined.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of three bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specialized service. While not a large number, it is sufficient to provide a basis for price and technical evaluation, likely leading to a fair market price.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and encourage innovation from contractors.
Public Impact
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) will benefit from improved acquisition processes and potential cost savings. Services delivered will focus on transforming and centralizing acquisition functions. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where NIH headquarters are located. The contract supports federal workforce development in acquisition and procurement roles.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if initial requirements are not precisely defined.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical acquisition transformation could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust evaluation process.
- Contract duration allows for focused implementation of transformation initiatives.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically within management and acquisition consulting. The federal market for these services is substantial, with agencies continually seeking expertise to improve operational efficiency and compliance. This award aligns with broader government-wide initiatives to modernize procurement practices and achieve better value for taxpayer dollars.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will likely be managed by the contracting officer and program officials within the National Institutes of Health. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports may not be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- NIH Acquisition Centralization Initiative
- Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Compliance
- Government Management Consulting Services
- Procurement Modernization Initiatives
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep
- Contractor performance risk
- Dependence on single awardee
Tags
professional-scientific-technical-services, health-and-human-services, national-institutes-of-health, district-of-columbia, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, management-consulting, acquisition-support, transformation-initiative
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Health and Human Services awarded $196,576 to JEFFERSON CONSULTING GROUP LLC. OALM ACQUISITION TRANSFORMATION AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT NIH ACQUISITION CENTRALIZATION INITIATIVE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is JEFFERSON CONSULTING GROUP LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (National Institutes of Health).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $196,576.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2027-04-02.
What is the track record of Jefferson Consulting Group in supporting federal acquisition transformation initiatives?
Jefferson Consulting Group has a history of providing management consulting services to federal agencies. While specific details on their past acquisition transformation projects require deeper investigation into contract databases, their presence in this market suggests experience. It is important to review their past performance evaluations and any reported issues on contracts of similar scope and complexity to fully assess their capabilities and reliability for this NIH initiative. Their ability to deliver on complex change management and process improvement projects will be critical for the success of the NIH's centralization efforts.
How does the value of this contract compare to similar acquisition support contracts awarded by other agencies?
The $1.97 million value for a one-year contract for acquisition transformation support is within the typical range for specialized consulting services. Similar contracts for agencies undertaking significant procurement modernization or centralization efforts can range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars, depending on the scope, duration, and complexity. Factors such as the number of bids received and the specific deliverables outlined in the SOW (Statement of Work) are crucial for a precise comparison. Given it was awarded under full and open competition with three bidders, the price appears competitive for the services rendered.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks include potential scope creep, where the project's objectives expand beyond the initial agreement, and contractor underperformance. Mitigation strategies involve a well-defined Statement of Work (SOW), clear performance metrics, and regular progress reviews by NIH officials. The firm-fixed-price contract structure also incentivizes the contractor to manage costs effectively. Furthermore, the full and open competition process aims to select a contractor with a proven track record, reducing the risk of selecting an unqualified vendor. Continuous monitoring by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) is essential.
What is the expected impact of this contract on NIH's overall procurement effectiveness and efficiency?
The anticipated impact is a significant improvement in NIH's procurement effectiveness and efficiency through centralization. This initiative aims to standardize processes, reduce duplication of effort, enhance compliance with federal regulations, and potentially achieve better pricing through consolidated purchasing power. By transforming acquisition functions, NIH expects to streamline operations, shorten procurement cycles, and free up resources for its core scientific mission. The success of Jefferson Consulting Group's support will be directly measured by the tangible improvements in these areas.
What has been the historical spending by NIH on acquisition support services over the past five years?
Analyzing historical spending by NIH on acquisition support services over the past five years would provide valuable context. While specific figures are not provided here, trends in federal spending indicate a consistent need for such services as agencies strive for modernization and efficiency. Understanding NIH's previous investment levels in this area can help benchmark the current $1.97 million award and assess whether it represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in acquisition transformation. This historical data is crucial for evaluating the long-term strategic commitment to improving procurement.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 75N98026Q00091
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1666 K ST NW STE 1110, WASHINGTON, DC, 20006
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $989,580
Exercised Options: $196,576
Current Obligation: $196,576
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 75N98022D00036
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-03
Current End Date: 2027-04-02
Potential End Date: 2031-04-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-09
More Contracts from Jefferson Consulting Group LLC
- ,Ct::igf - PSA - Procurement Support Award Support Services Contracting Contract — $49.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Provide Procurement Support Services to Washington, DC Offices and Overseas Field Missions — $46.8M (Agency for International Development)
- NEW Rissa Award - AFR Bureau the Primary Focus of Rissa IS to Continue Crucial Research and Institutional Support to AFR, Ensuring That IT IS Able to Achieve the Goals of the Africa Joint Regional Strategy: 1) Advance Mutual Peace and Security INT — $31.6M (Agency for International Development)
- THE Purpose of the Gendev ISC IS to Engage Subject Matter Experts and Technical Expertise to Support Efforts Related to Gender Integration and Equality in the Design, Implementation, and Monitoring and Evaluation of Usaid Programming. Through This in — $22.6M (Agency for International Development)
- 505TH TRG Academic and Training Support Services Recompete — $13.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts
- Contact Center Operations (CCO) — $5.5B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Oper of Govt R&D Goco Facilities — $4.8B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide the Full Complement of Services Necessary to Care for UC in ORR Custody Including Facilities Set-Up, Maintenance, and Support Internal and Perimeter (IF Applicable) Security, Direct Care and Supervision Inc — $3.5B (Rapid Deployment Inc)
- Contact Center Operations — $2.6B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- Federal Contract — $2.4B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →