NIH awards $3.1M for administrative management and general management consulting services to Teya Support Services LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,108,781 ($3.1M)

Contractor: Teya Support Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2024-09-13

End Date: 2027-09-12

Contract Duration: 1,094 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NIDDK PROGRAM SUPPORT AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99501

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $3.1 million to TEYA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC for work described as: NIDDK PROGRAM SUPPORT AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.1M over approximately 3 years. 2. Awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators include sole-source award and lack of detailed performance metrics. 4. Services fall under administrative management and general management consulting. 5. Contract is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price. 6. Geographic location of performance is Alaska.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $3.1 million for administrative management and general management consulting services appears to be within a reasonable range for a multi-year support contract. However, without a competitive bidding process, it is difficult to benchmark the pricing against market rates or similar contracts. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, but the absence of competition raises concerns about whether the government secured the best possible value. Further analysis of the specific services rendered and their necessity would be required for a more definitive value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach limits the opportunity for price discovery and potentially higher costs for the government. The justification for a sole-source award is not provided in the data, which is a significant factor in assessing the procurement's fairness and efficiency. Without competition, there is less pressure on the contractor to offer the most competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can lead to higher costs for taxpayers as the government may not benefit from the competitive pricing that typically results from an open bidding process.

Public Impact

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) benefits from these administrative and management consulting services. Services are delivered to support the operations of the NIDDK program. The geographic impact is concentrated in Alaska, where the contractor will perform the services. Workforce implications are related to the support staff provided by Teya Support Services LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits competition and potential cost savings.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor effectiveness.
Geographic concentration in Alaska may limit the pool of potential future contractors.
The specific nature of 'administrative management and general management consulting' is broad and could benefit from more defined deliverables.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Definitive contract structure allows for a defined period of performance.
Contract is with Teya Support Services LLC, a specific entity.

Sector Analysis

The administrative management and general management consulting services sector is broad, encompassing a wide range of support functions for government agencies. This contract, valued at $3.1 million over approximately three years, falls within the typical spending range for such services. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without knowing the specific tasks, but agencies frequently contract for these types of services to augment internal capabilities or provide specialized expertise. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a major federal agency that utilizes such support to manage its extensive research programs.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it indicate any subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, it does not directly contribute to the small business contracting goals. The absence of small business participation could mean missed opportunities for smaller firms to gain experience and revenue within this sector.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically involve contract officers and program managers within the NIH. Accountability measures are established through the firm fixed-price contract terms and the defined period of performance. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award and the lack of publicly available justification for this procurement approach. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

NIDDK Program Support
Administrative Management Services
General Management Consulting Services
Health and Human Services Contracts
National Institutes of Health Support

Risk Flags

Sole-source award without clear justification.
Lack of publicly available performance metrics.
Limited competition may lead to suboptimal pricing.
Geographic concentration in Alaska.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $3.1 million to TEYA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC. NIDDK PROGRAM SUPPORT AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TEYA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (National Institutes of Health).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-13. End: 2027-09-12.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The provided data does not include the specific justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are awarded when only one responsible source is available or capable of meeting the agency's needs. This could be due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent requirements where a competitive process would be impractical or detrimental to the government's interests. Without this justification, it is difficult to assess whether the sole-source decision was appropriate and if it resulted in fair pricing for the government. Further investigation into the contract file or agency procurement records would be necessary to understand the rationale behind this decision.

How does the $3.1 million contract value compare to similar administrative and management consulting contracts awarded by the NIH or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking the $3.1 million contract value requires a detailed comparison of the scope of work, duration, and specific services rendered. However, as a general observation, this value is within the expected range for multi-year support contracts for administrative and management consulting services, especially for a large agency like the NIH. Many federal agencies procure similar services, with contract values varying significantly based on the complexity and duration of the support. The sole-source nature of this award, however, prevents a direct comparison to competitively bid contracts, which would likely offer more insight into the value for money achieved.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract, and how will they be measured?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this contract. For administrative management and general management consulting services, KPIs could include metrics related to efficiency improvements, cost savings achieved, timeliness of support, accuracy of reports, or client satisfaction. The absence of this information makes it challenging to assess the contractor's performance and the overall effectiveness of the services provided. A comprehensive contract review would typically include an examination of the statement of work and performance standards to understand these expectations.

What is the track record of Teya Support Services LLC in performing similar government contracts?

Information regarding the track record of Teya Support Services LLC in performing similar government contracts is not provided in the data. To assess their past performance, one would typically look at contract history, past performance evaluations, and any reported issues or successes on previous awards. A contractor's history is a crucial factor in determining their capability to successfully execute a new contract. Without this background information, it is difficult to gauge the reliability and effectiveness of Teya Support Services LLC for this specific NIDDK program support requirement.

What is the historical spending pattern for NIDDK program support and management services, and how does this contract fit within that pattern?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award and does not offer historical spending patterns for NIDDK program support and management services. To analyze historical spending, one would need access to data on previous contracts for similar services, including their values, durations, and award types. This contract, valued at $3.1 million over approximately three years, represents a specific investment in these services. Understanding past spending would help determine if this award is consistent with previous levels of investment, an increase, or a decrease, and whether the shift towards a sole-source award is a deviation from historical procurement practices.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: 75N94024Q000125

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 101 E 9TH AVE STE 9B MS-05, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99501

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,226,901

Exercised Options: $3,108,781

Current Obligation: $3,108,781

Actual Outlays: $1,255,816

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $460,600

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline