GSA awards $3.2M facilities support contract to Teya Support Services LLC in Arizona

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,210,751 ($3.2M)

Contractor: Teya Support Services LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-12-01

End Date: 2026-11-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CFM SERVICES AT YUMA FEDERAL FACILITIES. BASE PERIOD CALL ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: YUMA, YUMA County, ARIZONA, 85364

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.2 million to TEYA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC for work described as: CFM SERVICES AT YUMA FEDERAL FACILITIES. BASE PERIOD CALL ORDER Key points: 1. Contract provides essential facilities support services for federal buildings. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Firm fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty. 4. Performance period spans one year, indicating a short-term operational need. 5. Contractor Teya Support Services LLC is relatively new to federal contracting. 6. Geographic focus on Arizona highlights regional service delivery. 7. No small business set-aside was utilized for this award.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.2 million for a 364-day period for facilities support services appears within a reasonable range for the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities maintenance and management in the federal sector, particularly for a single location or a small group of facilities, suggests this pricing is competitive. However, without more detailed service requirements and performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the use of full and open competition generally promotes a robust bidding environment. This approach is intended to ensure the government receives the best possible pricing and services by leveraging market competition. The absence of specific competition metrics makes it difficult to definitively assess the intensity of the bidding.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the preferred method for federal procurements as it maximizes the potential for cost savings and ensures a wide range of qualified contractors can compete, ultimately benefiting taxpayers through potentially lower prices and higher quality services.

Public Impact

Federal facilities in Arizona will receive essential maintenance and operational support. Government agencies operating within these facilities will benefit from uninterrupted services. The contract supports the General Services Administration's mission to manage federal property. Local workforce in Arizona may be engaged for service delivery. Ensures the safety, functionality, and appearance of federal buildings.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited track record of the awardee in federal contracting.
Potential for performance issues if contractor lacks experience in federal facility management.
Scope of services is broad and requires comprehensive facility management expertise.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Contract duration allows for initial performance assessment before potential extension.

Sector Analysis

The facilities support services sector is a critical component of the federal government's operational infrastructure, encompassing a wide range of activities from maintenance and repair to security and logistics. This contract falls under the broader category of facilities management, which is a substantial market within the federal government. Spending in this sector is consistently high as agencies rely on these services to maintain their physical assets. Comparable contracts often involve janitorial, HVAC, electrical, and general building upkeep, with values varying significantly based on facility size, complexity, and geographic location.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and the data indicates the awardee is not a small business. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or benefits specifically for small businesses mandated by this award. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses to participate as prime contractors were not prioritized in this specific procurement. Future contracts or task orders under broader agreements might include small business participation goals.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically employs various oversight mechanisms for contracts, including performance monitoring, quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs), and regular contractor performance reviews. As this is a firm fixed-price contract, the primary accountability measure is the contractor's adherence to the defined scope of work and service level agreements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Inspector General oversight would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract's performance.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
Public Buildings Service Operations
Facilities Maintenance and Operations Contracts
General Services Administration Procurement

Risk Flags

Contractor performance history unknown.
Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
Reliance on a single contractor for essential services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.2 million to TEYA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC. CFM SERVICES AT YUMA FEDERAL FACILITIES. BASE PERIOD CALL ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TEYA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-01. End: 2026-11-30.

What is the past performance history of Teya Support Services LLC with the federal government?

Based on the provided data, Teya Support Services LLC is the awardee of this contract. However, the data does not include specific details about their past performance history with the federal government. As a relatively new entity or one with limited federal contract awards, further investigation into their experience with similar projects, client references, and any performance evaluations would be necessary to fully assess their capabilities and reliability. Federal procurement systems often track contractor performance, and a deeper dive into these records would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record.

How does the awarded price compare to similar facilities support contracts in Arizona?

The awarded value of approximately $3.2 million for a 364-day period for facilities support services in Arizona requires comparison with similar contracts to assess its competitiveness. Without specific details on the scope of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC, security, landscaping) and the size/complexity of the federal facilities covered, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, for a single federal facility or a small cluster of facilities, this price point is within a plausible range. The firm fixed-price nature helps control costs. A detailed analysis would involve comparing the cost per square foot or cost per service hour against other GSA or agency contracts for comparable facilities in the same geographic region.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract award?

Key risks associated with this contract include potential performance deficiencies if Teya Support Services LLC lacks sufficient experience in managing federal facilities, especially given the broad nature of 'facilities support services.' There's also a risk related to the contractor's financial stability and capacity to scale operations if unforeseen demands arise. Since the contract is for a single base year, there's a risk of disruption if follow-on work is not secured or if the government needs to re-compete the requirement, potentially leading to transition costs. The firm fixed-price structure, while beneficial for cost control, can also pose a risk if the contractor underestimates the scope or complexity, leading to potential quality compromises if not managed closely.

How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money in this scenario?

The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks of cost overruns are manageable. For facilities support services, where many tasks are routine and predictable (e.g., cleaning, basic maintenance), FFP provides cost certainty for the government and incentivizes the contractor to control costs efficiently. The contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns, which can lead to more competitive pricing during the bidding phase. However, if the scope is poorly defined or unforeseen issues arise, the contractor might cut corners on quality to maintain profitability, potentially diminishing value. Robust performance monitoring by the government is crucial to mitigate this risk.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the GSA in Arizona?

Historical spending data for facilities support services by the GSA in Arizona would provide context for this $3.2 million award. Analyzing past contracts awarded by GSA's Public Buildings Service (PBS) in Arizona for similar services (e.g., building operations, maintenance, custodial) would reveal average contract values, durations, and the typical range of competition. This analysis could indicate whether this award is an outlier, consistent with trends, or represents an increase/decrease in spending. Understanding historical patterns helps in assessing the reasonableness of the current award and identifying potential shifts in procurement strategies or market conditions within the region.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PK0226Q0001

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 101 E 9TH AVE STE 9B, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99501

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,843,442

Exercised Options: $3,843,442

Current Obligation: $3,210,751

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PG5226A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline