FEMA awards $12.2M for Region 6 Production and Technical Services, focusing on engineering support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,209,802 ($12.2M)

Contractor: Compass PTS JV, the

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2024-09-30

End Date: 2027-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,094 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REGION 6 PRODUCTION AND TECHNICAL SERVICES (PTS) RISK MAP

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22201

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $12.2 million to COMPASS PTS JV, THE for work described as: REGION 6 PRODUCTION AND TECHNICAL SERVICES (PTS) RISK MAP Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized engineering services over a three-year period. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Contract duration aligns with typical project lifecycles for technical support. 5. Engineering services are critical for FEMA's disaster response and preparedness infrastructure. 6. Virginia location may indicate a concentration of technical expertise or operational needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $12.2 million contract for Region 6 Production and Technical Services (PTS) is a significant award for engineering support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized engineering services, the pricing appears competitive, especially given the three-year duration. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for FEMA. While specific per-unit cost data is not available, the overall value seems aligned with the scope of technical and production support required for disaster management.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple capable vendors were able to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is beneficial for price discovery and ensuring the government receives the best value. The open nature of the competition suggests a mature market for these engineering services.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to more favorable pricing for taxpayers by encouraging a wider range of vendors to offer their services, driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the residents and communities within FEMA's Region 6, who will receive enhanced support during disaster preparedness and response. The contract delivers essential engineering and technical services crucial for maintaining and improving FEMA's operational capabilities. Geographic impact is focused on Region 6, which typically covers states like Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico. Workforce implications include potential job creation for engineers, technicians, and support staff within the contracting company and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if not clearly defined in task orders.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical technical services could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract reduces financial risk for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust market and potential for competitive pricing.
Long-term contract provides stability for essential technical support services.

Sector Analysis

The engineering services sector is a vital component of government contracting, supporting a wide array of federal agencies. This contract falls within the broader engineering services industry, which includes specialized fields like civil, mechanical, and electrical engineering, as well as technical consulting. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of providing the required expertise. FEMA's spending in this area is consistent with its mission to manage disaster response and recovery, requiring significant technical and logistical support.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While this specific award may not directly benefit small businesses through a set-aside, the prime contractor, COMPASS PTS JV, is a joint venture, which can sometimes involve small business participation. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within the scope of this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) contracting officers and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract simplifies financial oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

FEMA Disaster Relief Fund
FEMA Public Assistance Program
FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
Engineering Services Contracts
Technical Support Services

Risk Flags

Contract Performance Risk
Scope Definition Risk
Technical Challenge Risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $12.2 million to COMPASS PTS JV, THE. REGION 6 PRODUCTION AND TECHNICAL SERVICES (PTS) RISK MAP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMPASS PTS JV, THE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Emergency Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-30. End: 2027-09-29.

What is the track record of COMPASS PTS JV in performing similar engineering and technical support services for federal agencies?

Information regarding the specific track record of COMPASS PTS JV is not detailed in the provided data. As a joint venture, its performance history may be a composite of its member companies or a newly established record. A thorough review of past performance evaluations, contract awards, and client feedback for COMPASS PTS JV and its constituent entities would be necessary to fully assess their capabilities and reliability in delivering complex engineering and technical services. This would include examining their experience with government contracts, particularly those involving disaster response or similar large-scale technical support requirements.

How does the $12.2 million contract value compare to other FEMA engineering support contracts in Region 6?

Without specific data on comparable FEMA engineering support contracts in Region 6, a direct comparison is challenging. However, $12.2 million over three years for specialized engineering and technical services can be considered a substantial award, reflecting the critical nature of FEMA's mission. The value suggests a significant scope of work, potentially encompassing a range of technical assessments, planning, and support activities. Benchmarking against similar contracts across different FEMA regions or for other federal agencies involved in infrastructure or emergency management would provide a more robust understanding of its relative value and market alignment.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential performance issues from the contractor, scope creep if requirements are not well-defined, and the possibility of unforeseen technical challenges. Mitigation strategies are embedded in the contract structure: the firm-fixed-price (FFP) type limits financial risk for FEMA, shifting cost overrun responsibility to the contractor. The full and open competition process aims to select a highly capable vendor. Clear task orders, regular performance reviews, and defined deliverables are crucial for managing performance and scope. FEMA's oversight mechanisms will also play a vital role in identifying and addressing risks proactively.

What is the expected effectiveness of these engineering services in supporting FEMA's mission?

The engineering and technical services procured under this contract are expected to significantly enhance FEMA's ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters within Region 6. This includes providing expertise in areas such as infrastructure assessment, damage evaluation, technical planning, and potentially supporting the implementation of mitigation strategies. Effective delivery of these services can lead to more efficient resource allocation, better-informed decision-making during crises, and improved resilience of communities within the region, ultimately contributing to the overall effectiveness of FEMA's disaster management efforts.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar engineering and technical support services by FEMA?

Historical spending patterns for FEMA's engineering and technical support services can vary significantly year-to-year, influenced by the frequency and severity of natural disasters, as well as evolving agency needs and priorities. FEMA consistently invests in technical expertise to support its core missions. Analyzing past contract awards for similar services, particularly those related to disaster response, recovery, and mitigation planning, would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured. This contract's $12.2 million value over three years appears to be a typical investment for comprehensive technical support in a large FEMA region.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Solicitation ID: 70FBR624R00000005

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3101 WILSON BLVD, SUITE 900, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,209,802

Exercised Options: $12,209,802

Current Obligation: $12,209,802

Actual Outlays: $4,958,417

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $469,983

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70FA6021D00000004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline