Department of Transportation awards $244K task order to Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC for regulatory project

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $244,464 ($244.5K)

Contractor: Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2020-10-01

End Date: 2025-10-26

Contract Duration: 1,851 days

Daily Burn Rate: $132/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Transportation

Official Description: WRA FY25 REGULATORY PSH-WRA25-1003TASK ORDER IS TO INCREMENTALLY FUND WRATH'S REGULATORY PROJECT.

Place of Performance

Location: BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY County, MARYLAND, 21230

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $244,463.66 to PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC for work described as: WRA FY25 REGULATORY PSH-WRA25-1003TASK ORDER IS TO INCREMENTALLY FUND WRATH'S REGULATORY PROJECT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for incremental funding of a regulatory project. 2. The contract is a delivery order under a larger award. 3. The contractor, Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC, has a single award in this category. 4. The contract duration is 1851 days, spanning from October 2020 to October 2025. 5. The contract type is Cost No Fee, indicating payment is based on allowable costs. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 483111 for Deep Sea Freight Transportation.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $244,463.66. As this is a task order for incremental funding of a regulatory project, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging without understanding the project's scope and deliverables. Benchmarking against similar regulatory support contracts would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment. The Cost No Fee contract type suggests that the government will reimburse allowable costs, which can sometimes lead to less price certainty compared to fixed-price contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed and was awarded as a sole-source delivery order. The data indicates it is a 'NOT COMPETED' award. This means that only one contractor was solicited or considered for this specific task order. Without a competitive process, it is difficult to ascertain if the pricing reflects market rates or if alternative solutions were explored.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to drive down prices. Transparency in the justification for sole-source procurement is crucial for ensuring fair pricing.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Transportation, specifically the Maritime Administration, which receives support for its regulatory project. The services delivered are related to the incremental funding and execution of a regulatory project. The geographic impact is likely focused on the operational areas of the Maritime Administration. Workforce implications are primarily for the contractor's personnel involved in the regulatory project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and limited innovation.
The long duration of the contract (1851 days) could indicate a lack of flexibility or a need for sustained, specialized support.

Positive Signals

The award supports a specific regulatory project within the Department of Transportation, indicating a need for specialized expertise.
The contractor, Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC, is established in the transportation sector.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under the Deep Sea Freight Transportation sector (NAICS 483111). This sector is critical for national and international trade. The Maritime Administration plays a key role in regulating and supporting maritime activities. The contract's focus on a regulatory project suggests it supports the agency's oversight and compliance functions within this vital sector. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other contracts for regulatory support, policy development, or compliance services within the transportation and maritime industries.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor engages small businesses as subcontractors, which is not specified.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the delivery order and the overarching contract it falls under. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, with further details on oversight depending on the specific reporting requirements of the Maritime Administration.

Related Government Programs

Maritime Administration Regulatory Support
Department of Transportation Policy Development
Deep Sea Freight Transportation Oversight

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Lack of detailed scope information
Cost-reimbursement contract type

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $244,463.66 to PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC. WRA FY25 REGULATORY PSH-WRA25-1003TASK ORDER IS TO INCREMENTALLY FUND WRATH'S REGULATORY PROJECT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Maritime Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $244,463.66.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-10-01. End: 2025-10-26.

What is the specific nature and scope of the 'regulatory project' being funded by this task order?

The provided data does not detail the specific nature or scope of the 'regulatory project.' It only states that the task order is to incrementally fund 'WRATH's REGULATORY PROJECT.' To understand the project's objectives, deliverables, and expected outcomes, further information from the Department of Transportation or the Maritime Administration would be required. This could include project plans, statements of work, or agency justifications for the project's necessity and its alignment with departmental goals.

What is Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC's track record with the Department of Transportation and specifically the Maritime Administration?

Based on the provided data, Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC has at least one award with the Department of Transportation. However, the data does not offer a comprehensive history of their performance, past contracts, or specific experience with the Maritime Administration beyond this single delivery order. A deeper dive into contract databases and performance reviews would be necessary to assess their track record, including on-time delivery, quality of work, and adherence to budget on previous engagements.

How does the pricing structure of this Cost No Fee contract compare to similar regulatory support services in the transportation sector?

Assessing the pricing of a Cost No Fee (CNF) contract is complex as it is based on reimbursable costs rather than a pre-negotiated fixed price. Without detailed cost breakdowns from the contractor and benchmark data for comparable regulatory support services within the transportation sector, a direct comparison is difficult. Typically, CNF contracts are used when the scope of work is uncertain or when cost estimation is challenging. To evaluate value, one would need to analyze the allowable costs incurred against the project's progress and outcomes, and compare these to industry standards for similar services.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to measure the success of this regulatory project?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics for this regulatory project. For a Cost No Fee contract, success is often measured by the achievement of project milestones, adherence to regulatory requirements, and the effective utilization of awarded funds to meet the project's objectives. The Maritime Administration would be responsible for defining and monitoring these KPIs. Without this information, it is challenging to objectively assess the effectiveness and success of the services rendered under this task order.

What is the historical spending pattern for regulatory projects within the Maritime Administration, and how does this award fit into that pattern?

The provided data does not offer historical spending patterns for regulatory projects within the Maritime Administration. This specific award of $244,463.66 is for incremental funding over approximately five years. To understand its place in historical spending, one would need to analyze past budgets and expenditures for similar regulatory initiatives undertaken by the agency. This would involve examining trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured for regulatory support over several fiscal years.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Deep Sea, Coastal, and Great Lakes Water Transportation › Deep Sea Freight Transportation

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 745 FORT ST STE 315, HONOLULU, HI, 96813

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $244,464

Exercised Options: $244,464

Current Obligation: $244,464

Actual Outlays: $244,464

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 693JF720G000003

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline