Department of Transportation awards $630K task order to Pasha Hawaii Holdings for freight transportation support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $630,278 ($630.3K)
Contractor: Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation
Start Date: 2020-10-01
End Date: 2025-07-26
Contract Duration: 1,759 days
Daily Burn Rate: $358/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE
Sector: Transportation
Official Description: WAS FY25 TA 25-1 PSH-WAS25-2016A TASK ORDER TO SUPPORT TURBO ACTIVATION-25-1
Place of Performance
Location: BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY County, MARYLAND, 21230
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Transportation obligated $630,277.62 to PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC for work described as: WAS FY25 TA 25-1 PSH-WAS25-2016A TASK ORDER TO SUPPORT TURBO ACTIVATION-25-1 Key points: 1. The contract value of $630,277.62 appears reasonable for the duration and scope of supporting Turbo Activation. 2. This contract was not competed, raising questions about potential price discovery and value for money. 3. The duration of 1759 days (nearly 5 years) suggests a long-term need for these services. 4. The 'Cost No Fee' contract type indicates that the government reimburses the contractor for allowable costs without an additional profit margin. 5. The contractor, Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC, is involved in deep sea freight transportation, aligning with the contract's nature. 6. The contract is a delivery order under a larger award, suggesting it's part of a broader framework.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type 'Cost No Fee' means the government pays for the contractor's direct costs plus indirect costs, but no profit. This can be cost-effective for the government if costs are well-managed, but it reduces the contractor's incentive for efficiency. Benchmarking is difficult without knowing the specific services rendered and associated costs. However, the total value over nearly five years averages to approximately $130,000 annually, which seems moderate for specialized transportation support.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded as a delivery order under a previously established award, and the data indicates it was 'NOT COMPETED' at the task order level. This suggests that either the original award was sole-source, or this specific task order was awarded non-competitively to an existing contract holder. Without details on the original award's competition, it's difficult to assess the breadth of market engagement.
Taxpayer Impact: A sole-source award limits the opportunity for competitive bidding, potentially leading to higher prices than if multiple vendors had vied for the contract. Taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible value without a competitive process.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is likely the Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration, which receives support for its Turbo Activation program. The services delivered are crucial for the operational readiness and activation of specific transportation assets or initiatives. The geographic impact is not specified but is likely tied to the operational areas of the Maritime Administration. Workforce implications are minimal for the public, as the contract is with a private entity, though it supports government functions.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition for this task order limits price discovery and potentially increases costs for taxpayers.
- The 'Cost No Fee' structure, while reimbursing costs, may not incentivize maximum contractor efficiency.
- The long contract duration (nearly 5 years) could lock the government into a potentially suboptimal arrangement if market conditions or needs change.
Positive Signals
- The contract is with an established entity (Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC) likely possessing relevant expertise in freight transportation.
- The delivery order mechanism suggests it fits within a pre-existing contractual framework, potentially streamlining acquisition.
- The 'Cost No Fee' type ensures that the government only pays for actual, allowable costs incurred by the contractor.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the Transportation and Logistics sector, specifically related to deep sea freight. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 483111 covers Deep Sea Freight Transportation. This sector is critical for national supply chains and defense readiness. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more specific details on the services provided, but the contract value appears modest within the broader federal transportation spending landscape.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a factor in this specific award. There is no indication of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements associated with this delivery order. Therefore, the impact on the small business ecosystem is likely negligible for this particular contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Transportation's internal review processes and potentially the Government Accountability Office (GAO) if specific issues arise. As a 'Cost No Fee' contract, rigorous auditing of incurred costs would be a key accountability measure. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, making public scrutiny of the procurement process challenging.
Related Government Programs
- Maritime Administration Operations Support
- Federal Freight and Logistics Contracts
- Defense Transportation Services
- Deep Sea Shipping Contracts
Risk Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Cost Reimbursement Contract Type
- Long Contract Duration
Tags
transportation, maritime-administration, department-of-transportation, delivery-order, cost-plus-fixed-fee, not-competed, freight-transportation, deep-sea-freight-transportation, maryland, pasha-hawaii-holdings-llc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Transportation awarded $630,277.62 to PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC. WAS FY25 TA 25-1 PSH-WAS25-2016A TASK ORDER TO SUPPORT TURBO ACTIVATION-25-1
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Maritime Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $630,277.62.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-10-01. End: 2025-07-26.
What specific services does Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC provide under this task order to support 'Turbo Activation'?
The provided data indicates the task order is 'WAS FY25 TA 25-1 PSH-WAS25-2016A TASK ORDER TO SUPPORT TURBO ACTIVATION-25-1'. While the NAICS code 483111 points to Deep Sea Freight Transportation, the exact nature of the support for 'Turbo Activation' is not detailed. This could range from logistical planning, vessel chartering, cargo management, or operational support related to maritime assets. Understanding the specific deliverables is crucial for a comprehensive value assessment. Without this, it's difficult to determine if the $630,277.62 over 1759 days represents fair market value for the precise services rendered.
Why was this task order awarded on a non-competed basis?
The data explicitly states 'CT: NOT COMPETED'. This implies that the task order was awarded directly to Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC without soliciting bids from other vendors. Reasons for non-competition can include urgency, sole-source justification based on unique capabilities, or being a follow-on to a previously competed contract where only one vendor could fulfill the requirement. Without further documentation from the agency, the specific justification remains unknown, but it prevents competitive price discovery and potentially limits the government's ability to secure the best value.
How does the 'Cost No Fee' contract type impact contractor performance and government oversight?
A 'Cost No Fee' (CNF) contract means the government reimburses the contractor for all allowable costs incurred in performing the contract, but the contractor does not receive any profit. This structure is often used when the scope of work is uncertain or when the government is primarily concerned with ensuring the availability of a service rather than incentivizing profit maximization. For the government, it requires robust oversight to ensure costs are reasonable, allocable, and allowable. For the contractor, the primary motivation is cost recovery, not profit generation, which can sometimes lead to less focus on efficiency compared to fixed-price contracts.
What is the historical spending pattern with Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC for similar services?
The provided data is for a single task order valued at $630,277.62 with an end date in July 2025. To assess historical spending patterns, one would need to examine previous contracts awarded to Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC by the Department of Transportation or other federal agencies, particularly those related to maritime logistics or activation support. Analyzing the volume, value, and types of services rendered over time would provide context on the contractor's track record and the government's reliance on their services. Without this broader historical data, it's difficult to establish a trend or benchmark against past performance.
What are the risks associated with a nearly five-year 'Cost No Fee' contract awarded non-competitively?
Several risks are associated with this contract structure. Firstly, the non-competed nature means potential overpayment due to lack of market price discovery. Secondly, the 'Cost No Fee' structure might reduce the contractor's incentive to control costs efficiently, potentially leading to higher overall expenditures than anticipated. Thirdly, the long duration (1759 days) creates a risk of obsolescence if the technology or operational needs change significantly over the contract period. Finally, without clear performance metrics tied to profit (as there is no profit), ensuring optimal service delivery and contractor responsiveness can be more challenging for the government.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Deep Sea, Coastal, and Great Lakes Water Transportation › Deep Sea Freight Transportation
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 745 FORT ST STE 315, HONOLULU, HI, 96813
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $630,278
Exercised Options: $630,278
Current Obligation: $630,278
Actual Outlays: $630,134
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 693JF720G000003
IDV Type: BOA
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-10-01
Current End Date: 2025-07-26
Potential End Date: 2025-07-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-10
More Contracts from Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC
- Brittin FY 23 GAA M&R Cost Reimbursable Pah-Btn23-Gac a — $31.9M (Department of Transportation)
- Brittin FY25 GAA M&R Cost Reimbursable a Psh-Btn25-Gac a — $3.4M (Department of Transportation)
- WAS FY25 Repairs a Psh-Was25-1005a Task Order IS to Fund Cape Washington Repairs a — $655.6K (Department of Transportation)
- Cape Wrath Shoreside Support Wra-Fy25-100c Modification Issued to ADD Funding to Support Cape Wrath Shoreside Support Thru 10-31-2024 — $585.0K (Department of Transportation)
- Cape Washington FY24 ROS Crew Cost/Wages Psh-Was24-1002a Issued to Fund the Crew Cost/Wages Onboard the Cape Washington — $556.6K (Department of Transportation)
Other Department of Transportation Contracts
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $3.8B (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Delivery Order Award IS to ADD Funding for FTI Telecommunications Services — $1.9B (Harris Corporation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (THE Mitre Corporation)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $1.5B (Harris Corporation)