Transportation contract for shoreside support awarded to Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC for over $543K

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $543,318 ($543.3K)

Contractor: Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2024-10-01

End Date: 2026-02-12

Contract Duration: 499 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Transportation

Official Description: CAPE WASHINGTON SHORESIDE SUPPORT WAS-FY25-100C MODIFICATION ISSUED TO ADD FUNDING TO SHORESIDE SUPPORT THRU 11-30-2024

Place of Performance

Location: BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY County, MARYLAND, 21230

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $543,317.85 to PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC for work described as: CAPE WASHINGTON SHORESIDE SUPPORT WAS-FY25-100C MODIFICATION ISSUED TO ADD FUNDING TO SHORESIDE SUPPORT THRU 11-30-2024 Key points: 1. Contract provides essential shoreside support services, crucial for maritime operations. 2. Awarded as a modification, indicating an extension or addition to existing services. 3. The contract duration extends through February 2026, ensuring continuity. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 483111 points to Deep Sea Freight Transportation. 5. The contract type is Cost No Fee, which requires detailed cost reporting and justification. 6. The base contract was not competed, raising questions about potential cost efficiencies.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $543,317.85 for shoreside support over its period of performance needs further benchmarking against similar services. As a modification to an existing contract, the pricing structure is likely based on previously negotiated rates. Without access to the base contract details or comparable market data for specialized shoreside support, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Cost No Fee (CNF) contract type necessitates rigorous oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and directly related to the services provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract modification was not competed, suggesting it may be a sole-source award or a modification to an existing contract that was previously competed under different circumstances. The lack of competition for this specific modification limits the government's ability to solicit and evaluate alternative pricing and service offerings, potentially impacting cost savings. Further investigation into the justification for not competing this modification is warranted.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for this contract modification means taxpayers may not be benefiting from the most cost-effective pricing that a competitive bidding process could have yielded.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the operations supported by Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC, ensuring seamless maritime logistics. Services delivered include essential shoreside support, vital for the functioning of deep-sea freight transportation. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the operational ports where Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC provides services. Workforce implications include the continued employment of personnel involved in shoreside support operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition for this modification limits price discovery and potential savings for taxpayers.
Cost No Fee contract type requires diligent oversight to prevent cost overruns and ensure reasonableness.
The base contract's original competition status is unknown, impacting the overall value assessment.
Limited public information on the specific services rendered under this modification.

Positive Signals

Ensures continuity of critical shoreside support services for maritime operations.
Awarded to a known entity, Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC, potentially leveraging established working relationships.
Contract duration extends to February 2026, providing stability for supported operations.

Sector Analysis

The maritime transportation sector is a critical component of global and national logistics, involving significant infrastructure and operational spending. This contract falls under deep-sea freight transportation, a sub-sector characterized by large vessels, complex port operations, and substantial supply chain management. Spending in this area often involves specialized equipment, skilled labor, and extensive regulatory compliance. Benchmarking this contract's value would ideally involve comparing it to other shoreside support contracts for similar vessel types and port operations, considering factors like service scope, duration, and location.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not competed and does not appear to have a small business set-aside. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from this specific modification. The absence of a set-aside suggests that the primary contractor, Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC, is likely a large business, and the contract's value does not appear to be structured to specifically benefit the small business ecosystem through set-aside goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this Cost No Fee contract would primarily fall under the Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration. Accountability measures would involve rigorous review of the contractor's incurred costs to ensure they are reasonable, allocable, and allowable. Transparency is facilitated through contract reporting mechanisms, though specific details of the services and costs may be subject to proprietary considerations. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any potential fraud, waste, or abuse is identified.

Related Government Programs

Maritime Administration Operations
Deep Sea Freight Transportation Services
Port Operations Support
Vessel Support Services

Risk Flags

Lack of Competition
Cost No Fee Contract Type
Potential for Cost Overruns
Limited Transparency on Justification

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $543,317.85 to PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC. CAPE WASHINGTON SHORESIDE SUPPORT WAS-FY25-100C MODIFICATION ISSUED TO ADD FUNDING TO SHORESIDE SUPPORT THRU 11-30-2024

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Maritime Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $543,317.85.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2026-02-12.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract modification on a sole-source basis?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. Typically, sole-source awards are justified under specific circumstances outlined in federal acquisition regulations, such as when only one responsible source can provide the required services, there is a compelling urgency, or the acquisition is for a follow-on effort to a previously competed contract where competition is no longer feasible or economical. Without further documentation from the agency (e.g., a Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition - JOFOC), the precise reason remains unclear. Understanding this justification is crucial for assessing whether the government adequately explored competitive options and obtained the best possible value for taxpayer dollars.

How does the cost structure of this Cost No Fee (CNF) contract compare to other similar shoreside support contracts?

Cost No Fee (CNF) contracts are less common than fixed-price or cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts. In a CNF arrangement, the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs but does not receive a fee or profit. This structure is typically used for non-profit organizations or when the government has a strong interest in the contractor performing the work without profit, often in situations where the contractor's primary motivation is not financial gain. To compare its cost structure, one would need to analyze the allowable costs incurred by Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC against the scope of services provided. Benchmarking would involve comparing these incurred costs to the total contract values of similar shoreside support services procured through competitive, fixed-price, or cost-plus contracts, adjusting for differences in service scope, duration, and geographic location. The absence of a fee means the government avoids paying profit, but the focus shifts entirely to the reasonableness and allowability of the costs.

What is the historical spending pattern for shoreside support services by the Maritime Administration?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for shoreside support services by the Maritime Administration (MARAD) would provide context for the current contract's value and duration. This involves examining past contract awards for similar services, noting the number of competitors, contract types, award amounts, and performance periods. Significant year-over-year increases or decreases in spending, or a trend towards sole-source awards, could indicate shifts in agency priorities, market conditions, or procurement strategies. For instance, if MARAD has consistently competed these services and awarded them to multiple vendors, a recent sole-source modification might warrant closer scrutiny. Conversely, if this is a continuation of a long-standing, non-competed arrangement, it might reflect a stable, albeit potentially less cost-effective, procurement approach. Access to MARAD's contract database or historical solicitations would be necessary for a comprehensive analysis.

What are the specific services included under 'shoreside support' for deep-sea freight transportation?

Shoreside support for deep-sea freight transportation encompasses a range of services essential for the efficient operation of vessels and cargo handling at port facilities. These services can include, but are not limited to: vessel berthing and mooring assistance, pilotage coordination, tugboat services, line handling, provision of utilities (water, electricity, waste disposal), security services, maintenance and repair coordination, communication services, and potentially administrative support related to vessel calls. For this specific contract, the exact scope would be detailed in the contract statement of work (SOW). Understanding these specifics is crucial for evaluating the contract's value and ensuring that the costs incurred are directly tied to necessary operational functions that facilitate the movement of deep-sea freight.

What is the track record of Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC in performing government contracts, particularly with the Department of Transportation?

Pasha Hawaii Holdings LLC is a known entity in the maritime industry, operating as a shipping and logistics company. Assessing their track record with government contracts, especially with the Department of Transportation (DOT) and its Maritime Administration (MARAD), would involve reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), any past performance issues or disputes, and the types and values of contracts previously awarded to them. A history of successful contract performance, timely delivery, and adherence to quality standards would indicate reliability. Conversely, any documented performance deficiencies, contract terminations, or significant disputes could raise concerns about their ability to meet the requirements of this current contract modification. Information on their past performance is critical for a comprehensive risk assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Deep Sea, Coastal, and Great Lakes Water Transportation › Deep Sea Freight Transportation

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 745 FORT ST STE 315, HONOLULU, HI, 96813

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $543,318

Exercised Options: $543,318

Current Obligation: $543,318

Actual Outlays: $516,972

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 693JF720G000003

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline